Originally posted by: AmberClad
Edit: Er, speaking of skinnee...
Welcome to AT 😀, looking to forward to the T3 review (I thought it was going to be posted today?).
Originally posted by: zagood
Originally posted by: aigomorla
Originally posted by: Zap
But could your design have a street price of $70 and still be profitable for the manufacturer as well as the reseller?
yes its called a lapped true with Sflex fan. :X
I hate to jump in on this point, but for an "off the shelf" solution, stores are charging around $20 to lap a TRUE. So, going off the cheapest prices, let's say $50 for the cooler, $20 for the lapping service, and $13 for the fan. Plus lapping the CPU to get full benefit.
For people who would build their own WC, lap their heatsink, use oversized fans, sleeve cables, etc. you can probably do better for the price, just like building your own computer from the ground up you can get better performance for the same you would spend on, say, a dell. But for non-enthusiasts the H-50 looks like a great price/performance solution.
My issue would be what maintenance will be like for a unit running for a year+ 24/7. If these are meant for the non-enthusiast (or lazy pseudo-enthusiast) then that may be an issue.
-z
They warranty it for 2 years, so read into that what you will 😉. I wonder what the first point of failure would be though, evaporation or the integrated pump failing.Originally posted by: Rubycon
What's the life expectancy of the unit? Since one cannot open it up and inspect wetted parts, perform eddie current testing (just kidding!), etc...
1 year before time to replace it? What about the pump noise?
Originally posted by: aigomorla
However, i think a specialized water tester should get a sample. At least so we can see where entry level kits like this stand amongst the enthusiast setups.
Originally posted by: videogames101
Dude, a lapping service? Last time I checked, lapping a CPU takes an afternoon, not a $20 payment.
Originally posted by: Zap
It's like trying to market TV dinners to chefs. They (chefs/enthusiasts) just don't get it.
Originally posted by: skinnee
First thing I want to comment on is the mud slinging about review sites. I've been following the threads and reviews from XS, Hexus and MadShrimps. What you're seeing with mixed results depending on the site is not because someone received a unit for free then juiced the numbers in order to keep a sponsorship or connection, but the variance in test benches. Cross comparing benches is a bad, bad thing to do. I can't speak for other sites, but the amount of time and money I have invested in my site is mind boggling. Yes, I receive product samples and prototypes to test...I then spend a ton of time testing and reviewing those products, my payment for time is the sample/prototype...which turns out to be a lot less per hour than working at McDonalds. So please, if you're going to sling mud at a review site just understand the amount of work and effort that goes on behind the scenes.
Originally posted by: VirtualLarry
Well, I watched the video, and to me, it seemed rigged. I've run C2D dual-cores and quad-cores at up to TJMax (100C, usually), and they don't blue-screen.
So something else was up with the rig.
The AMD results may seem like a bit on the high side but we tested, and retested, and remounted, and checked and changed the pump and fan connectors, but the results were entirely consistent. The problem is that the Cosmos 1000 lacks any intake fans, it only has teo 120mm exhaust fans in the roof and a 120mm exhaust fan in the above the I/O shield. As a result, even when we set the Corsair H50 to draw air in from outside the case the system ran very hot.
It's a worrying trend that pairing a case without positive pressure or a ready route for air to escape through a mesh means performance suffers massively. After the CPU had been under load for an hour the motherboard around the CPU socket was to hot it wasn't comfortable to touch, while the CPU block was also very hot. Worse still, the air temperature inside the case was in excess of 45C. Relatively this makes it worse than the stock AMD cooler - i.e. clearly very, very poor.
Clearly with a normal heatsink the two roof fans draw off the heat right out the case, leading to better performance, but with the radiator on the H50 limiting airflow, it really makes the whole setup struggle. Evidently the H50 isn't suitable for use in every case.
Originally posted by: theprodigalrebel
bit-tech has it beating the CoolIT Domino, Titan Fenrir and TRUE on a Core i7-965 EE (3.6GHz @ 1.3V) by 4/6/7 degrees respectively (Domino and Fenrir both running at full speed).
Originally posted by: AmberClad
They warranty it for 2 years, so read into that what you will 😉. I wonder what the first point of failure would be though, evaporation or the integrated pump failing.Originally posted by: Rubycon
What's the life expectancy of the unit? Since one cannot open it up and inspect wetted parts, perform eddie current testing (just kidding!), etc...
1 year before time to replace it? What about the pump noise?
By contrast:
RAM = lifetime warranty
PSUs = 5 year warranty (maybe just the two I have? it might not apply to their budget line)
Not that Swiftech is all that impressive either. I think theirs is 1 year.