Corrected: Toys R Us to shutdown all stores

K1052

Elite Member
Aug 21, 2003
52,539
46,107
136
Probable start of a large waive of retailers and landlords going tits up over the next couple years.
 

Svnla

Lifer
Nov 10, 2003
17,986
1,388
126
Today's WSJ says TRU could declare that it would close all stores in NA as early as this coming Monday.

I better use up the $20 GC from TRU soon.
 

UNCjigga

Lifer
Dec 12, 2000
25,553
10,232
136
Saw this and that Claire's (i.e. the place where every girl gets their ears pierced) are filing for bankruptcy. I can imagine that in only a few more years, most malls will be empty save for the tumbleweeds.
 

dullard

Elite Member
May 21, 2001
25,993
4,605
126
Amazon adds another kill stripe to the side of it's HQ.
Partly. It would be more accurate to say it adds another stripe to the side of leveraged buyouts.

What a great idea, have a company borrow infinite amounts of money, pocket a billion of that loan money for myself, then see if the company can survive. If not, no real harm done as I have my billion. Rinse and repeat.
 

vi edit

Elite Member
Super Moderator
Oct 28, 1999
62,484
8,345
126
Partly. It would be more accurate to say it adds another stripe to the side of leveraged buyouts.

What a great idea, have a company borrow infinite amounts of money, pocket a billion of that loan money for myself, then see if the company can survive. If not, no real harm done as I have my billion. Rinse and repeat.

Isn't that the Trump business model?
 

K1052

Elite Member
Aug 21, 2003
52,539
46,107
136
Partly. It would be more accurate to say it adds another stripe to the side of leveraged buyouts.

What a great idea, have a company borrow infinite amounts of money, pocket a billion of that loan money for myself, then see if the company can survive. If not, no real harm done as I have my billion. Rinse and repeat.

Lots of these deals are basically the scene in Goodfellas where they take a stake in the bar and wring it out for all it's worth before burning it down for the insurance money.
 
  • Like
Reactions: SteveGrabowski

fskimospy

Elite Member
Mar 10, 2006
87,916
55,234
136
Partly. It would be more accurate to say it adds another stripe to the side of leveraged buyouts.

What a great idea, have a company borrow infinite amounts of money, pocket a billion of that loan money for myself, then see if the company can survive. If not, no real harm done as I have my billion. Rinse and repeat.

It's amazing to me that it's legal for a company to go millions in debt to buy themselves.
 
  • Like
Reactions: SteveGrabowski

brycejones

Lifer
Oct 18, 2005
29,816
30,583
136
Partly. It would be more accurate to say it adds another stripe to the side of leveraged buyouts.

What a great idea, have a company borrow infinite amounts of money, pocket a billion of that loan money for myself, then see if the company can survive. If not, no real harm done as I have my billion. Rinse and repeat.

So much this. The business was loaded down with massive amounts of debt to the new owners and on the hook for $400M a year in interest payments. This basically took all the positive cash flow for the company and left very little to invest in the underlying business.

TLDR:

Wall street got their cut, the business was run into the ground.
 

dullard

Elite Member
May 21, 2001
25,993
4,605
126
Wall street got their cut, the business was run into the ground.
Which is perfectly fine as long as we ignore the shoppers, employees, lenders, and businesses that sold to Toys R Us. But, I can't see them through the wads of cash that I'm holding, so they don't exist.
 

Sonikku

Lifer
Jun 23, 2005
15,900
4,922
136
Anyone watch The Toy Box? They're always harping about how a successful toy at the end of the season with get this big grand EXCLUSIVE deal to sell their new toy idea solely in Toys R Us. Not looking like such a good deal now...
 

brycejones

Lifer
Oct 18, 2005
29,816
30,583
136
Which is perfectly fine as long as we ignore the shoppers, employees, lenders, and businesses that sold to Toys R Us. But, I can't see them through the wads of cash that I'm holding, so they don't exist.

In Wall Street you eat what you kill.
 

Sonikku

Lifer
Jun 23, 2005
15,900
4,922
136
Which is perfectly fine as long as we ignore the shoppers, employees, lenders, and businesses that sold to Toys R Us. But, I can't see them through the wads of cash that I'm holding, so they don't exist.
I think my chief problem with the GoP is that they complain it isn't sustainable to have too many takers and not enough makers, yet the focus exclusively on poor people getting a hundred or so odd foodstamps a month to feed their families. They do nothing about the big takers that have made multi million if not billion dollar business models built off of enriching the few at the expense of the many. They at best ignore said behavior and at worse reinforce it, to the detriment of us all.
 

Meghan54

Lifer
Oct 18, 2009
11,684
5,228
136
What I find rather distasteful is the current regime's instance on "saving coal", and industry that currently employs 52,000 people, yet be completely oblivious to the current retail struggles, which will impact many more people.

Toys R Us employs 65,000 in the U.S. Sears, another looming fatality, employs 140,000. JCPenney employs 106,000---another very ripe for BK. TRU by itself dumps more employees as the entire coal industry employs.

The coal industry shutting down today would impact small areas of the country while the stores above will impact almost every city in the U.S. Guess spreading the hurt is good? And the types of jobs being lost....basically unskilled but decent pay, esp. for women....won't be regained any time soon.
 

Bitek

Lifer
Aug 2, 2001
10,676
5,239
136
Isn't that the Trump business model?

Yeah, he's trying it out now on the US Treasury.
---


So when will Trump announce tariffs (on ???) to protect honest retail workers in the heartland who are losing jobs in magnitudes over coal workers?

Oh yeah, he doesn't give a shit about them.
But f it, never liked shopping @ TRU anyway.
 

sandorski

No Lifer
Oct 10, 1999
70,763
6,333
126
The Internet is the main reason for these Retailer bankruptcies. Many will fail, but eventually it should level out.
 

Pipeline 1010

Golden Member
Dec 2, 2005
1,974
794
136
It's amazing to me that it's legal for a company to go millions in debt to buy themselves.

Why? The people lending the money do so willingly and calculatedly. These guys are killers and they know what they are doing when they lend this money. They wouldn't have money to lend if they didn't usually get it right. They got it wrong this time.
 

Puffnstuff

Lifer
Mar 9, 2005
16,188
4,872
136
Toys R Us employs 65,000 in the U.S.
I'm looking at Bloomberg and they state 64k employees which is irrelevant to each one of them when they stand to lose their livelihood. If you look at the Feb 23rd latest developments paragraph they expect to close 182 stores by April 16th, however, a lot can change in two weeks which is where we are today.

Their official website is creepy crawling right now but I did find their most current 8k filing.
https://www.toysrusinc.com/investor...9MCZTUURFU0M9U0VDVElPTl9FTlRJUkUmc3Vic2lkPTU3

In that statement they acknowledge losing funding from Deutsche Bank AG.
 

FeuerFrei

Diamond Member
Mar 30, 2005
9,144
929
126
I imagine once the news gets out your company is "struggling" customers / lenders tend to stay away. Sucks.
 

ch33zw1z

Lifer
Nov 4, 2004
39,744
20,315
146
Right. As long as we avoid federal bailouts, I won't complain. Private sector can finance what they want.
Avoid federal bailouts lol....sure sure, and pigs can fly. TRU won't get one, they're not a financial institute that's too big to fail after fucking over citizens for a while. But dont you worry, the next one is in the works, just like every single one before it. You didn't think '08 was the first time, right?
 

FeuerFrei

Diamond Member
Mar 30, 2005
9,144
929
126
Avoid federal bailouts lol....sure sure, and pigs can fly. TRU won't get one, they're not a financial institute that's too big to fail after fucking over citizens for a while. But dont you worry, the next one is in the works, just like every single one before it. You didn't think '08 was the first time, right?
I just like a hands off policy. The likelihood of such a policy, is another matter.
I think most would find the very idea of a federal TrUs bailout laughable. I'm not suggesting it was ever in the cards.