corporate greed

kamiam

Banned
Dec 12, 1999
2,638
0
0
major corporations are making money on the deaths of FORMER employees deaths bt taking out insurance policies on their RANK AND FILE employees even if the employee left thier employment ...corporate greed
 

HOWITIS

Platinum Member
Apr 26, 2001
2,165
0
76
when coperations stop being greddy there will be no corperations. their not in the game to bake cookies.
 

kamiam

Banned
Dec 12, 1999
2,638
0
0


<< when coperations stop being greddy there will be no corperations. their not in the game to bake cookies. >>

to try and make money off a dead FORMER employee is just plain sick...

<< . their not in the game to bake cookies >>

and they shouldn't be in a game of making money off the dead...unless thier business is a MORTURARY:disgust::|
 

NuclearFusi0n

Diamond Member
Jul 2, 2001
7,028
0
0
There's nothing wrong with them taking out insurance policies on their employees....It's their money, let them spend it how they like (unless they kill their employees :Q)
 

ChrisIsBored

Diamond Member
Nov 30, 2000
3,400
1
71


<< There's nothing wrong with them taking out insurance policies on their employees.... >>



If you read the article though... apparently they took out the life insurance policy two weeks after he stopped working there.
 

NuclearFusi0n

Diamond Member
Jul 2, 2001
7,028
0
0


<<

<< There's nothing wrong with them taking out insurance policies on their employees.... >>



If you read the article though... apparently they took out the life insurance policy two weeks after he stopped working there.
>>


nothing wrong with that either.
 

Moonbeam

Elite Member
Nov 24, 1999
74,803
6,775
126
Dying without an insurance policy is like environmental waste. Why waste a perfectly good death by not collecting on it.
 

Mister T

Diamond Member
Feb 25, 2000
3,439
0
0
its not corporate greed... its risk management.
Most of the outcry stems from pissed off family members because they or their loved one that died were ill prepared to deal with such an event. So, they blame the corporation - which realizes the risk and hedges it - for collecting insurance (who paid for it).

Next your going to tell me that the corporation has enslaved the poor man right?
 

ScottyB

Diamond Member
Jan 28, 2002
6,677
1
0
I don't think anyone but the person in question should be able to take out life insurance on said person.
 

XZeroII

Lifer
Jun 30, 2001
12,572
0
0
What if the person lives to 100? That would be a real waste of money, wouldn't it? They are taking a risk. Now if they started driving a van around running people over, that would be a different story. Anyway, what do you care? They could have an insurance policy on you, but what harm is that causing you? None. If they want to take out an insurance policy on me, fine. I plan to live forever, and it will be a waste of money.
 

Linflas

Lifer
Jan 30, 2001
15,395
78
91
The thing I cannot figure out in all this is why insurance companies allow it. I thought you had to have an insurable interest before you could take out a life insurance policy on an individual? It would seem to me that once the employee leaves the company any insurable interest they might have had ceases to exist. Then again I am not in the insurance business so really have no idea of what all the requirements and legalities are.
 

Hammer

Lifer
Oct 19, 2001
13,217
1
81
If anyone should be upset it should be the insurance companies, they're the ones who are losing on this.
 

cavingjan

Golden Member
Nov 15, 1999
1,719
0
0
My company has insurance policies on us. Makes sense to me. If one of our travelling inspectors dies, we are going to have to spend 6 months training someone else to do the job. That's a lot of time effort and money to do so. The insurance policy covers that. BTW the the employees also have their own policy for their families, etc paid by the company.
 

vi edit

Elite Member
Super Moderator
Oct 28, 1999
62,484
8,345
126


<< My company has insurance policies on us. Makes sense to me. If one of our travelling inspectors dies, we are going to have to spend 6 months training someone else to do the job. That's a lot of time effort and money to do so. The insurance policy covers that. BTW the the employees also have their own policy for their families, etc paid by the company. >>



Yeh, that's pretty much what I have to say about it. I've been in one job in particular that takes WELL over a year to get fully trained for the position. It's a very difficult position to fill, and requires a very special type of person to do it. The company spent a lot of time and money training me for that job and if I had kicked the bucket a couple months after training, then my employer would be out several thousand dollars on me.

If spouces/family members aren't responsible enough to pay $5-$20 a month for a life insurance policy, it's their problem.