Originally posted by: Amused
Then I take it you will never accept a donated organ if you need it?
Correct. I will not. You may be able to live knowing you stole life from another person, I could not.
Originally posted by: dullard
When I read this earlier, I took it to mean the coroner has a job which is made secure by laws that say only a coroner can pronounce a person dead. When the coroner was bypassed, he worried about not getting paid to to the job and thus complained.
You can replace the word coroner with just about any of the relatively unskilled jobs that states require permits to do legally - and my thoughts apply to those situations as well.
If two separate hospitals do tests and conclude a person is dead, I'm confident they are telling the truth. And anyways, it sounds like a suicide, so the donor got what he wanted, lets let him rest knowing he got what he wanted.
Your argument is based on a fallacy. Any doctor can pronounce an individual as dead, provided the appropriate circumstances.
What you seem to not understand is that organ harvesting can ONLY take place while the heart is still beating and the blood is still flowing. In order to determine death in these cases, where the heart is still beating (albeit often still beating under mechanical or chemical stimulus), it must be absolutely established that brain death has occurred.
The difficulty here is that organ transplants are an extremely profitable and in-demand business for doctors and hospitals, and when a young otherwise-healthy-except-for-severe-head-trauma individual is brought in at the point of death, it has been found that the hospitals are often more eager to harvest organs than to save the life. In the case here, it seems that the coroner believes that, in the hospitals rush to harvest, the appropriate tests to determines brain death were not performed.
Talking out my ass? Not only have several major national publications exposed this in recent years, but I'm sure the major internet search engines, like Google, still work.