SpatiallyAware
Lifer
- Sep 7, 2009
- 12,960
- 3
- 0
Am I the only one that is not excited about this? I'm even in a very 'technical' field, and I just feel like 'things' have gotten to where they're taking away from our lives rather than adding to it.
I only watched the first half of the video, but I can say with a pretty high level of confidence that just about everything I saw is achievable now. Cost is a different matter but like everything else, I imagine that it would drop relatively rapidly once introduced and widespread adoption begins.
Microsoft is in big trouble IMO. Windows 8 being available for ARM is a step in the right direction but like previous MS efforts in the mobile and tablet market, I'm going to guess that it won't be adequate or see widespread adoption. Look at the embarrassing pummeling they've been taking in the smartphone market for years.
They've been taking that beating because truly never had a focused direction in that market. And if Microsoft's mobile arm fails entirely, well, so what? In the market, it's just another competitor, and for Microsoft themselves, it's only small product lineup, and dropping that market would barely hurt them.
Windows Mobile used to basically be all about trying to make a mobile experience that felt like you were using Windows. And so that in of itself kind of took off, with it's own class of mobile devices (UPMCs anyone?) as users looked for the Windows experience on the go.
And then we all realized what a terrible idea that really is. Windows is great... on a computer. Handheld computer? Make it perform differently, thanks.
Windows Mobile 6 was fun to tinker with, but overall was ugh. That and it wasn't developed for capacitive touch, though some tweaks with 6.5 tried to correct that.
Windows Phone 7 is a nice and different approach, a whole new direction. Will it ultimately get them the marketshare they are fighting for? Not sure.
wow way too many displays in the future.
How much stuff that we have now was once "not ever cost effective"?i liked the video, thanks OP.
among all the neat glass fixtures, did anyone notice all the interdevice and network communication going on? moving files between mobile and rigid devices, quick/fast updates between the displays in the mall and the personal devices? being able to have a video conversation on your phone and then moving it on the fly to a fixed device would be a neat feature, but onto the countertop would require camera technology that would be interspersed throughout the display (different from how we implement it in cell phones now). it probably would not ever be cost effective to do this, and if they could, it would be a security nightmare. nonetheless, i always appreciate visionary type of videos like these because it can get your own creative juices flowing.
edit: very suggestive of the exponential power demands in the future, imo
shrug, i would be happy if they implemented it. i'm just pointing out engineering/technical opportunities that you or some other entrepreneur can take advantage ofHow much stuff that we have now was once "not ever cost effective"?
"You want 700 million transistors put on a single chip so that you can play games???? As if that'll ever happen!"
shrug, i would be happy if they implemented it. i'm just pointing out engineering/technical opportunities that you or some other entrepreneur can take advantage of
in regards to security, i mean that each of these things could wreak havoc if a virus could easily pass from a hacked bus stop machine to your personal device to your house to your car, all seamlessly -- another opportunity for a company to address.
to be honest, i think our field needs to explore more and shoot ourselves down less, even if it seems wasteful or cost inefficient now. unfortunately, our economy is not conducive to that environment.
well most of this will be closed platforms so a virus wouldn't run...more possible would be DoS type of attacks.
Let me explain this. There is no way in hell they will put touchscreen on top of heating element. That is called class action lawsuit waiting to happen.
Fridge, sure. Stove top? Are you nuts?
It's probably an induction stovetop. The surface does not get hot, and the lighting up of the "element" is just so you can see the setting.
I wish that all flat panel displays (portable and desktop) would be made of Gorilla Glass. T
Are you saying that a fucking 1200-3600W coil produces no heat on its own?
Are you saying that a fucking 1200-3600W coil produces no heat on its own?
An induction cooktop heats the pot or pan only. The "lighting up" would be just an effect to give you a visual indication of the burner setting you otherwise would not have. There's nothing to see with an induction stove.
![]()
Note the chocolate only melting in the pot, not on the stovetop.
