Core Temp 0.97

NoobyDoo

Senior member
Nov 13, 2006
463
0
71
Core Temp

Version 0.97 - 5th March, 2008

- Add: Vista x64 support - All drivers are now digitally signed!
- Add: Logitech G15 keyboard support - see ReadMe!.txt for details.
- Add: Support 45nm LGA775 Xeon series.

- Fix: Opaque background in system tray wasn't 16x16 pixels.
- Fix: Yonah based CPUs incorrectly detected.
- Fix: 1333FSB Dual Core Conroe based Xeon incorrectly detected.
- Fix: Dreaded cycle of "Driver can't load" messages if driver failed to load.
- Fix: Socket AM2 Athlon-FX was not recognized.

- Change: Core Temp layout on a Phenom.
 

Dadofamunky

Platinum Member
Jan 4, 2005
2,184
0
0
Yeah, thanks for bringing this up. I'll grab it right away. I just hope it's reasonably accurate.
 

AmberClad

Diamond Member
Jul 23, 2005
4,914
0
0
Awesome, no more using the hacked drivers versions of CoreTemp :D. Thanks OP.

Everything looks fine, numbers jive with SpeedFan and are pretty much what I'd expect (same as the XP version).
 

LOUISSSSS

Diamond Member
Dec 5, 2005
8,771
58
91
Originally posted by: Imported
Woo.. can finally check the VID of my Q6600.. and wow, it's 1.2000v!

wow thats wicked low!! i thought mine was low @ 1.212v
 

n7

Elite Member
Jan 4, 2004
21,281
4
81
Yay, finally signed x64 drivers.

Of course it doesn't really matter to me anymore, since i discovered Everest Ultimate to be quite awesome a long time ago.

But still, w00t.
 

LOUISSSSS

Diamond Member
Dec 5, 2005
8,771
58
91
or REALTEMP!!!

i stopped using my coretemp 0.96 for the past few days for the change and i'm liking it! partially bc RT reports lower core temps for me =]
 

TraumaRN

Diamond Member
Jun 5, 2005
6,893
63
91
Originally posted by: LOUISSSSS
Originally posted by: Imported
Woo.. can finally check the VID of my Q6600.. and wow, it's 1.2000v!

wow thats wicked low!! i thought mine was low @ 1.212v

Lucky....my VID is 1.2875(OUCH) which is why I need 1.36v just to be stable at basically the same speed as you
 

nerp

Diamond Member
Dec 31, 2005
9,867
105
106
Excellent. I like this program and feel it's much less resource intensive than speedfan -- not like it really matters on my system, but still.

It's also good to see people rallying around to help the author get signed drivers. Worthwhile investment.
 

Cheex

Diamond Member
Jul 18, 2006
3,123
0
0
Works great thanks.

Core Temp 0.96 would normally crash and reboot my system when I open it. This one works fine.
 

Estrella

Senior member
Jan 29, 2006
900
0
76
bump for those having a hard time finding this. I just got now got around to installing it even though it only takes a few seconds.
 

NoWhereM

Senior member
Oct 15, 2007
543
0
0
Sorry to bring up an old topic but I'd like to know how this version of Core Temp is working for others?

I was using Core Temp .95 and just upgraded my computer. I installed a Coolit Eliminator, an X-fi card, and replaced my 500w Seasonic with a 700w Seasonic. After the upgrade I wanted to keep a close eye on my cpu temps so I was running Core Temp usually every time I booted. The problem was my computer kept shutting down.

I tried everything but finally figured out that it was Core Temp itself that was shutting my computer down. I stopped using it last night and since I haven't had a single shut down.

Will .97 work for me? I have an Opteron 165 on an nForce 4 chipset motherboard if that helps. If not what other programs will show the temps on both cores of an AMD dual core cpu?