• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Core i7 2700K info

I really don't expect the 2700K to put any sort of significant distance in consistent OC potential between itself and the 2500K and 2600K. Basically going to be just another 980X -> 990X

The only way the 2700K would be a truly better option than the 2600K is if Intel included a respectable tower cooler or AIO water cooler like they plan to do with some of the SB-E chips. Currently SB are beast overclockers but the included coolers are laughable.
 
bunnyfubbles said:
I really don't expect the 2700K to put any sort of significant distance in consistent OC potential between itself and the 2500K and 2600K. Basically going to be just another 980X -> 990X

The only way the 2700K would be a truly better option than the 2600K is if Intel included a respectable tower cooler or AIO water cooler like they plan to do with some of the SB-E chips. Currently SB are beast overclockers but the included coolers are laughable.
Click to expand...

Wouldn't the quad channel memory also be a positive feature (or perhaps overkill)?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

Back
Top