oldhoss, I can reach 3.6GHZ, but not stable. 3.2GHZ is rock solid
Originally posted by: BigShroom
I'm looking for a no frills c2d motherboard also, right now I'm leaning towards the biostar tforce 965PT. It's $110 shipped at newegg. Seems to be getting some good reviews. First I was thinking of getting a gigabyte ds3 but I was scared off by the cold boot issues I've heard about.
Originally posted by: moosey
Price difference between the DS3 and the Biostar is at least $30 IIRC. The Biostar is down to $105. It's the S3 that's $110. Biostar should be great for your system as Anandtech rated it highly in the roundup, great price to performance....plus no Jmicron IDE controller.
Originally posted by: derail
From all that I have read it seems that most of the newer MB's seem to have Problems, I hope we see a more stabel chip set on MB's that works from the get go and suports Nivida SLI and quad core CPU's , and another that suports ATI crossfire and Quad Core CPU's.
When they charge $200-450 for there MB it should be rock stabel from the release date.
No kidding. Isn't it ironic that we find A64 platform to be more stable after all those years we're led to believe "stability = Intel"?Originally posted by: quest55720
I agree I almost gave up on getting a core 2 duo because every time I went to reseach a motherboard there were lots of issues. The only motherboard I could find with out issues was the bad axe 2 but that is out of my price range. I settled for the biostar p965pt it seemed to have very few problems and the price was right. I always assumed that intel had the most stable platforms I guess not. I don't have high expectations right now if the platform is half as stable and issue free as my old nforce 2 I will take it. It is a shame that intel could not come up with a better platform for such a killer CPU.