Originally posted by: Slickone
Originally posted by: bunnyfubbles
Unless you have some sort of extremely unique/ridiculous setup, cordless should never be considered for gaming.
Xbox 360, PS3, and Wii all come with cordless controllers. They work well (esp. the 360).
Yes, they work well, but they also have significant input latency, however this generally doesn't matter as much given the far more causal nature of consoles (however most console pros will choose wired over wireless if the option exists). Wireless was introduced into game controllers for the same reason as it was for PC peripherals - comfort of freedom
despite the penalty to performance. When most people talk about "gaming oriented" PC peripherals, the most important aspect separating the types is going to be performance.
I don't like how what I said earlier came out as I'm not advocating wireless setups as something that should never be used for gaming, I'm saying they should not be considered for
gaming specific setups without special circumstances. Its perfectly fine to choose a wireless setup that you
also game on, but if your priority is gaming, and you're buying the part specifically to game, I'm always going to think you're crazy unless you have a legit reason
Originally posted by: heymrdj
No normal human being can see the "lag" of wireless. I frag just as many of you "elitist" gamers with my DiNove Edge and Logitech MX mouse as the wired folk do with their high DPI lazer mice.
Most wireless mice incur a 25-50ms latency. While that may not be huge it is pretty significant and it is something that can be seen, even by "normal humans".