I know this is a gray area, but I was wondering what thoughts people had on this.
Here's the scenario I thought about
I buy a CD, I own it physically. I cannot duplicate it, except for use as a personal backup copy or for use on a PC/portable player (and this is just a "fair use" assumption of mine). Now say I back it up (MP3, FLAC, another CD - doesn't matter) and I lend the original CD to a friend. And I mean lend, not sell, so I am still unequiovocally the owner. Would the law restrict me from listening to my backup copy while the original is not in my possesion? Think about it, in the normal scenario, the only way 2 people could listen to the CD at the same time is if 2 copies existed. Now what if I lent this CD for a long time, or perhaps the CD was never returned to me? Would that limit my right to listen to my copy of the music?
Thoughts?
Here's the scenario I thought about
I buy a CD, I own it physically. I cannot duplicate it, except for use as a personal backup copy or for use on a PC/portable player (and this is just a "fair use" assumption of mine). Now say I back it up (MP3, FLAC, another CD - doesn't matter) and I lend the original CD to a friend. And I mean lend, not sell, so I am still unequiovocally the owner. Would the law restrict me from listening to my backup copy while the original is not in my possesion? Think about it, in the normal scenario, the only way 2 people could listen to the CD at the same time is if 2 copies existed. Now what if I lent this CD for a long time, or perhaps the CD was never returned to me? Would that limit my right to listen to my copy of the music?
Thoughts?