Human memory is event-based storage...it's kinda like encoding data to reduce its size -- as you know, when encoded data is played back the quality is below that of the original. In terms of the brain, the problem with this setup is its lack of reliability. You can memorize something exactly as it is, if you repeat it to yourself, but say something unusual or even traumatic happens to you...your brain will only recall certain key events and fill in the blanks with whatever seems sensible to the person. That's why 10 people can see one thing, yet each person will provide you with 10 unique accounts of what happened. Of course, there are exceptions.
So far, my answer to my quesion is that the brain is an analog device, not digital...therefore it can store a lot of information, but not reliably. If our brains were digital in nature, then we'd be able to remember thinks instantly and perfectly...but with a digital brain, I doubt that people would be capable of analog responses...such as feelings and emotions. If the brain does have some kind of tangible limit, it'd be interesting to see what happens if that limit is reached. I think our brains do have limits, and these limits can be expanded almost infinitely by 'exercising' the brain. Any data that is not used frequently gets deleted, or forgotten.
-= SsZERO =-