So because you don't like her tone, it's okay to wring her arm around, drop her forcefully to the ground on her front (she was pregnant) and arrest her. Despite the fact that she does not have to provide an ID. Despite the fact that the COP said there was no crime.
Instead of giving her the couple of minutes to make her call and trying to de-escalate the situation, the cop made it into a big f'ing deal. The guy could have said, look I'm just going to take both of your names to document this incident or whatever and let you both go because there's no evidence of a crime. Maybe you end up spending a bit more time waiting for both parties to cool off, but at least then you don't have to make it on the news for your douchebaggery.
Alas, cop sympathizers will sympathize.
Once again since several of you can't seem to grasp the simple concept that I did not say the cops did right, or wrong. But like always resort to personal attacks. What I said was true, the only person to play the race card, was the black woman. The news made it out to be a much bigger deal that it was, there was no "slamming down". But that is what the media does, shines cops in the worst possible light. To me it was pretty obvious who the instigator was, the black woman. You can tell by the way both women talk, and she was in the wrong. She didn't like being told to move. She got very heated and argumentative. That being said, the cops could have, and should have handled it better. It never should have ended up in an arrest.
You claim the cop should have just taken down their names, well the black woman was argumentative and didn't want to give her name, so how do you think he could have done that? Should have just ran her tag, got her name and made a report no matter if she wanted one or not. You think a cop should just wait while she makes a phone call? I don't, that's idiotic. He did say there was no crime and that seems clear to me as well. Should have just been a warning, talking to, whatever and been on the way.
Now, let what I said actually since in. Take off your blinders and put away your agenda. And the law is not the same in every state, in some you must produce a form of ID when requested. If the cop wanted to be a real ass, he could have let her drive off, then pulled her over. Then by CA law she would have had to given him her ID. But as it was, there was no crime. No vandalism, no assault, no anything, so she didn't have to give the ID. It would have made things so much easier, but she didn't want that.
Bullsh*t! The cop clearly treated the blonde woman differently than the black lady. Why didn't he ask for the blonde lady's name? Why didn't he ask for her identification?
The problem with most cops is they have this chip on their shoulders. They absolutely hate people that know the laws, because they can't force them to do what they want them to do. This black lady didn't have to tell the cop her name. She hadn't committed a crime. What's the offense? Being black? That's the offense.
I hope she sues and becomes a millionaire.
You're so disillusion it's pretty sad. Not even worth explaining. I'll leave you cop haters to enjoy this thread. I'm done. Like I said, must be slow because the usual suspects aren't out creating threads about cop abuse. And they sure aren't creating threads about cops being killed by thugs every day. No, that would go against all cops are bad.
Facebook
Twitter