Today, I went in to court for a speeding ticket. The cop showed up and the Judge proceeded to ask him the details of the case. The only thing that guy said for sure in the whole hearing were generic questions or what he wrote down about the traffic stop.
He could not have seen me until his radar alarm went off because there was a semi in the road blocking his lane and the only point where we had visual contact with each other was 1-2 seconds after he passed the semi and until I passed it. Of course, the guy denied the semi was in the road and claimed that he observed my vehicle approaching the vehicle ahead of me and pulling away from the vehicle behind me, then turned on the radar and clocked me. The whole ticket was riddled with holes and the guy was very rude during the hearing.
When I asked him a question about one of his screwups in writing the ticket, he raised his voice at me and retorted with a rude question and was about to yell at me but the Judge knew better and cut him off unfortunately.
I guess it was my mistake for thinking that the court system would be fair and my mistake for thinking that I could expect honesty from a police officer under oath. How can you say someone is guilty of a charge when the sole witness and accuser has nothing more to say than "he committed the crime"? I almost feel it is a shame I did not hire an attorney to rip this guy a new one because I do not have the training or talent to do so myself.
He could not have seen me until his radar alarm went off because there was a semi in the road blocking his lane and the only point where we had visual contact with each other was 1-2 seconds after he passed the semi and until I passed it. Of course, the guy denied the semi was in the road and claimed that he observed my vehicle approaching the vehicle ahead of me and pulling away from the vehicle behind me, then turned on the radar and clocked me. The whole ticket was riddled with holes and the guy was very rude during the hearing.
When I asked him a question about one of his screwups in writing the ticket, he raised his voice at me and retorted with a rude question and was about to yell at me but the Judge knew better and cut him off unfortunately.
I guess it was my mistake for thinking that the court system would be fair and my mistake for thinking that I could expect honesty from a police officer under oath. How can you say someone is guilty of a charge when the sole witness and accuser has nothing more to say than "he committed the crime"? I almost feel it is a shame I did not hire an attorney to rip this guy a new one because I do not have the training or talent to do so myself.