Copper-based thermal paste

AmberClad

Diamond Member
Jul 23, 2005
4,914
0
0
Why are copper-based thermal pastes much less commonly used than silver/aluminum-based ones? I'm only seen one type made by GeIL, and even that is hard to actually find in the retail market.

Doesn't copper have superior thermal conductivity? Is it a cost issue? Something about the molecular structure that causes it to fill in the microscopic gap between the proc and the heatsink less effectively?
 

Steve

Lifer
May 2, 2004
15,945
11
81
I thought silver was more conductive. It's definitely more marketable, it's got more bling.
 

AmberClad

Diamond Member
Jul 23, 2005
4,914
0
0
I think pure silver is more conductive, but the "silver" thermal compounds on the market have very little silver content compared to the other materials in them.
 

PottedMeat

Lifer
Apr 17, 2002
12,363
475
126
reactivity maybe? maybe it's hard to find a material to suspend pure copper in without losing the benefits of high thermal conductivity?
 

CycloWizard

Lifer
Sep 10, 2001
12,348
1
81
Originally posted by: PottedMeat
reactivity maybe? maybe it's hard to find a material to suspend pure copper in without losing the benefits of high thermal conductivity?
This is my guess as well. Copper oxides are very good insulators (as I found out when my car battery connections corroded a while back :p). Aluminum and especially silver are more resistant to oxidation and have similar or better conductivity.
 

aka1nas

Diamond Member
Aug 30, 2001
4,335
1
0
Before Arctic Silver was readily available online, they used to have Copper Ice, which was cheaper and for whatever reason, less effective.
 

Cogman

Lifer
Sep 19, 2000
10,284
138
106
Silver is a better thermal conducture the Copper is. It is fairly close but still better. Maybe I have not been looking hard enough, but I have not seen aluminum based compounds (especially ones that are ranked at any level)

A lot of people confuse electrical conductivity with thermal conductivity, They are NOT the same, As I recall, Diamonds have the highest thermal conductivity of any material, but they are electrical insulators.

The wiki has a small list of thermal conductivity of materials. Copper is 401, Silver is 429, Aluminum is 237, and Diamond is 900-2320 W/(m*K)
 

Veramocor

Senior member
Mar 2, 2004
389
1
0
Originally posted by: CycloWizard
Originally posted by: PottedMeat
reactivity maybe? maybe it's hard to find a material to suspend pure copper in without losing the benefits of high thermal conductivity?
This is my guess as well. Copper oxides are very good insulators (as I found out when my car battery connections corroded a while back :p). Aluminum and especially silver are more resistant to oxidation and have similar or better conductivity.


-5 chemical engineering points CycloWizard.

Aluminum oxidizes far more easy than copper. The kinetics are very quick. The only reason aluminum doesn't fully oxidize is that a barrier of corrosion product prevents any oxygen from diffusing to fresh metal.

If you were to make an aluminum powder I would suspect small particles of aluminum would be almost all aluminum oxide (high surface are to react with oxygen.

Tony
 

CycloWizard

Lifer
Sep 10, 2001
12,348
1
81
Originally posted by: Veramocor
-5 chemical engineering points CycloWizard.

Aluminum oxidizes far more easy than copper. The kinetics are very quick. The only reason aluminum doesn't fully oxidize is that a barrier of corrosion product prevents any oxygen from diffusing to fresh metal.

If you were to make an aluminum powder I would suspect small particles of aluminum would be almost all aluminum oxide (high surface are to react with oxygen.

Tony
P'shaw - that's chemistry! I hate chemistry. No, chemical engineers are not chemists. (Just anticipating the usual flow of questions that I get when I tell people I know just about zero chemistry. :p)
 

highwire

Senior member
Nov 5, 2000
363
0
76
Agreed, oxides of silver are probably more conductive thermally than copper oxides. I know that is the case electrically. And silver is also less likely to react with the carrier or surfaces to produce nuisance products. But, copper is in the running thermally.

Re: Aluminum's secret, its invisible oxide film.
If you were to make an aluminum powder I would suspect small particles of aluminum would be almost all aluminum oxide (high surface are to react with oxygen.

Tony
The rapidly formed oxide formed on aluminum is very thin. Even in the form of common aluminum pigment (microscopic flakes), the oxide is only a small percentage of the metal.
As you may know, aluminum is used in propellants and explosives. In this application, usually, the finer, the better. Only the metallic aluminum is useful in the reaction. So, again, I suspect, not much oxide form even with very small particle sizes.

Once-upon-a-time I had a Government contract to modify several large aircraft. One of the tasks dealt with some 0000 gauge(big) aluminum cables. The oxide is a problem for connections especially when many 100's of amps are involved. I was concerned. But, the answer was at the local industrial electric distributor - a big swagging tool, special terminals and this zinc metal goop to butter the connections with prior to swagging on the terminals. Oh yeah, wire brush to clean, bright metal first. Problem solved in style. All for an oxide film no one can see.
 

JRich

Platinum Member
Jun 7, 2005
2,714
1
71
Originally posted by: Veramocor
Originally posted by: CycloWizard
Originally posted by: PottedMeat
reactivity maybe? maybe it's hard to find a material to suspend pure copper in without losing the benefits of high thermal conductivity?
This is my guess as well. Copper oxides are very good insulators (as I found out when my car battery connections corroded a while back :p). Aluminum and especially silver are more resistant to oxidation and have similar or better conductivity.


-5 chemical engineering points CycloWizard.

Aluminum oxidizes far more easy than copper. The kinetics are very quick. The only reason aluminum doesn't fully oxidize is that a barrier of corrosion product prevents any oxygen from diffusing to fresh metal.

If you were to make an aluminum powder I would suspect small particles of aluminum would be almost all aluminum oxide (high surface are to react with oxygen.

Tony

That's why we use BCl3 when we plasma etch aluminum to scavenge the AlO2 of the Al before we hit it with Cl2 :)
 

highwire

Senior member
Nov 5, 2000
363
0
76
Well, Cl2 is going to make the Al disappear, so this must be some kind of chem milling, right?
 

JRich

Platinum Member
Jun 7, 2005
2,714
1
71
Originally posted by: highwire
That's why we use BCl3 when we plasma etch aluminum to scavenge the AlO2 of the Al before we hit it with Cl2 :)

I give up, what are we making here?

The Al interconnects for chips :) I work in a fab.
 

mmonnin03

Senior member
Nov 7, 2006
289
258
136
JRich, you must work for Intel?

I work for Micron and we use Copper interconnects, at least at our Fab in Manassas.

For one thing, copper migrates. Copper Will Not stay where you put it. Put it in some solution for thermal paste and heat it up....it is probably useless at transfering heat.

And besides just because a metal is good at transfering electricity doesnt mean it is the best at transfering heat. Properties somewhat go hand in hand but they are different.
 

JRich

Platinum Member
Jun 7, 2005
2,714
1
71
I work for Freescale. They use Al for the interconnects with W vias.
 

silverpig

Lifer
Jul 29, 2001
27,703
12
81
Originally posted by: JRich
That's why we use BCl3 when we plasma etch aluminum to scavenge the AlO2 of the Al before we hit it with Cl2 :)

ECR?

We use Cl2 to anisotropically etch silicon, and BCl3 for GaAs I believe.

Or is your process isotropic?
 

mmonnin03

Senior member
Nov 7, 2006
289
258
136
Freescale, a section of motorola...occording to Wiki on Oct 6, '06.

Ahh I wish I knew more about the Etch areas to know about what chemicals they use during.....oh I might get my arse fired if I keep talking. :D I may not be an expert in Dry/Wet etch but I may know enough to cause some trouble. :)
 

JRich

Platinum Member
Jun 7, 2005
2,714
1
71
Freescale is it's own company now. :) It just recently went from a publicly traded company to a private one.
 

chusteczka

Diamond Member
Apr 12, 2006
3,399
3
71
Originally posted by: AmberClad
Why are copper-based thermal pastes much less commonly used than silver/aluminum-based ones? I'm only seen one type made by GeIL, and even that is hard to actually find in the retail market. ...

The development of x-ray and photographic films produces a by-product comprising a silver slurry.
See: Silver Recovery

I have always assumed this is where the thermal paste manufacturers obtain their materials from, which is most likely more readily available than a similar substance with copper.
 

mmonnin03

Senior member
Nov 7, 2006
289
258
136
Hmmm I dont work in the photolithograhy department but I doubt we would be using something as conductive as silver in our resist films. I cant think anywhere that we use silver in the fab nor have even heard of that metal even mentioned once.
 

Necrotech

Junior Member
Jun 7, 2007
1
0
0
Ummmm You could use a suspended synthetic graphite

The average thermal conductivity is 470