• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Cop Tases Bound Black Man - man later dies of blunt force trauma - 1 mo in jail wknds

Indus

Lifer
http://www.theguardian.com/us-news/...georgia-student-taser-officer-prison-weekends

A former Georgia sheriff’s deputy, convicted for using a stun gun on a restrained detainee who later died alone in his cell, was sentenced on Friday to one month in jail and three years’ probation.

His conviction for cruelty of an inmate carried jail time of up to three years. But significantly shorter jail time was not the only way Chatham County superior court judge James Bass issued a more lenient sentence: he also allowed the former deputy to serve his time on the weekends.


While experts say weekend-only jail sentences are not unheard of, they are not common, either. In fact, some say they would like to see those sentences used more often – for defendants who aren’t members of law enforcement.

“It is the type of creative sentence that in one sense seems a great reform move because it allows people to serve time while keeping their jobs, thus promoting re-entry and life stability,” said Andrea Roth, an assistant professor at the UC Berkeley school of law. A similar remedy sees inmates allowed to serve time in a halfway house and attend work during the day, she said.

Roth, who is an expert in criminal law, said the weekend sentence is typically used for defendants who hold down a job that a judge finds “socially valuable” or when the individual is the “breadwinner for the family”.

“One would hope, however, that all defendants, and not just sheriff’s deputies, would get the benefit of such creative sentencing practices,” she said.

Last month, former Chatham County sheriff’s deputies Jason Kenny and Maxine Evans were found not guilty of involuntary manslaughter in the January death of 21-year-old Matthew Ajibade, a former Savannah College of Art and Design student. Though the manslaughter charge was dismissed, Kenny was found guilty of cruelty to an inmate, a felony.

Ajibade was taken into custody on domestic violence charges the evening of 1 January following an altercation with his girlfriend. His family has said Ajibade was having a manic bipolar disorder episode.

As deputies attempted to book him, Ajibade became “combative” and started a fight, according to the sheriff’s office. A video later released showed Kenny shocked Ajibade four times with a Taser, while the Nigerian man’s hands and feet were shackled. A local coroner ruled the student’s death a homicide by blunt force trauma. Kenny and eight other deputies were fired after the incident.


Another ex-deputy, Maxine Evans, received six years’ probation for providing false grand jury testimony, along with a $1,000 fine and 350 hours’ community service. A jail nurse, Gregory Brown, was found guilty of making false statements to investigators and received three years’ probation.

Kenny’s sentence to serve successive weekends is known as “intermittent sentencing”. Proponents of criminal justice reform point to the punishment as a way to offer courts “greater flexibility” to devise a punishment that matches a particular crime, said Paul Heaton, senior fellow and academic director at the Quattrone Center for the Fair Administration of Justice at the University of Pennsylvania’s law school.

Most states have statutes that allow for convicts to receive that type of punishment under certain circumstances, he added.

“Moreover, structuring a sentence this way can, in some cases, allow an offender to avoid negative collateral consequences (e.g., loss of employment, disrupted family relationships) that are not necessarily the intent of a particular sentence, but which might otherwise occur following a traditional sentence,” Heaton said in an email.

Heaton said he hasn’t seen “great” statistics on intermittent sentencing in the US, and that it is more common outside the US. It has, for example, been used in cases related to financial fraud and sexual abuse by Catholic priests.

“It happens now and again, especially to preserve employment,” said Stephanos Bibas, a professor of law and criminologyalso at Penn Law. “Maybe it should be more widespread. Cops sometimes get favored treatment, but the remedy might not be to abolish their deal, but to give it to others.”

In a statement provided to reporters through the family’s attorney, Ajibade’s cousin, Chris Oladapo, said: “Whatever sentence is handed here today makes no difference. These three people are just pawns, and those in leadership most culpable will be left unpunished.”

The office of Mark O’Mara, the family’s attorney, told the Guardian it is still considering a civil suit in the case.
So at least they tried and convicted the guy but only 1 month?

And to the police, do lives really matter? I mean they shot the guy who didn't want his bull to suffer and they shot him dead and they tased this guy to death.

As pointed out in the thread, your thread title, Cop Tases Bound Black Man To Death, Gets One Month Jail on Weekends, is absolutely false according to the article you posted. Thread title changed to reality. -Admin DrPizza
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Does 1 month jail on weekends mean 15 weekends of jail or 4-5? Because weekends are the best part of the week. That's more like 4 months of jail when you still have to work. Inhumane.
 
Funny how cops get all these special privileges, and the rest of us don't.

so anyone want to admit there is a systemic problem yet, or is everyone still in the "few bad apples" mode to excuse all these instances?
 
How dare we hold police accountable! That man shouldn't even have been charged, why do people hate cops! Just want to get this in until the usual people show up to tell us why this poor cop shouldn't be judged.
 
Thread topic:
Cop Tases Bound Black Man To Death

Article's description:
convicted for using a stun gun on a restrained detainee who later died alone in his cell
 
How dare we hold police accountable! That man shouldn't even have been charged, why do people hate cops! Just want to get this in until the usual people show up to tell us why this poor cop shouldn't be judged.

It's also important to hold article writers, thread creators, and miscellaneous forum respondents accountable to facts and truth. If you willingly choose to not care about them, why should anyone else care about them?

You're outraged. No matter how right you may be in the overall subject, you have to be the person you want other people to be. Details are what it's all about. Details must matter, they must be important. If you declare details to be irrelevant, so too will other people.
 
Last edited:
OP, don't you think your thread title is just a little dishonest?

Yeah dishonest OP, they BEAT him to death, not TAZED him to death. Cause of death: blunt force trauma. Get your shit right.

What exactly does the above change about the story? Multiple cops beat and tazed a hogtied man to the point where he eventually died. Then a bunch of cops lied about what happened. ONE cop then got weekend jail for a few weeks. Cops can literally beat a hogtied defenseless man to death and not incur any meaningful penalty.

Story after story shows that we are increasingly living in a police state and there are no shortage of assholes who come on this forum to express how much they like it that way.
 
What exactly does the above change about the story?

Nothing. What happened are facts. It doesn't matter how anyone chooses to describe the events, the facts of what happened always remain unchanged.

The difference is, if you want other people to re-devote themselves to honesty & truth, it's kind of hard to accomplish that goal when someone like Indus, and many others around this forum, flagrantly throws it out the window.

Anger is not the solution to anger. In my opinion.
 
Last edited:
Nothing. What happened are facts. It doesn't matter how anyone chooses to describe the events, the facts of what happened always remain unchanged.

The difference is, if you want other people to re-devote themselves to honesty & truth, it's kind of hard to accomplish that goal when someone like Indus, and many others around this forum, flagrantly throws it out the window.

Anger is not the solution to anger.

OK Indus has been tried and found guilty of using the word Tases instead of Beats. He has belligerently, wrongfully, dishonestly, and evilly used the wrong word. He has to "re-devote himself to honesty and truth". How much more melodramatic do you want to get about this?

Now what? Will you be resuming your defense of the police state or has this little deflection been your attempt at that?
 
OK Indus has been tried and found guilty of using the word Tases instead of Beats. He has belligerently, wrongfully, dishonestly, and evilly used the wrong word. He has to "re-devote himself to honesty and truth". How much more melodramatic do you want to get about this?

Now what? Will you be resuming your defense of the police state or has this little deflection been your attempt at that?

Refer to what I have stated earlier in the thread for the answer to your question. It's all there. If I just come out and tell you the answer to your question, (1) you'd never believe it, & (2) you'd never learn for future situations.
 
Last edited:
When you embellish a story for attention, what you are actually doing is informing the readers that your opinion is the original story as it factually stands is not important enough for other people to bother caring about.

That's in part why you have to be responsible to the facts.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top