Cop rear ends a person arrest them for DUI...

[Quiksilver]

Oops...

 

[theflyingpig]

Typical police behavior. These kinds of things occur all the time. Everyone knows this.

 

[p2daall]

I hope every single one of them lose their badges and does jail time.

 

[GodlessAstronomer]

The girl was drunk. The cop should be charged with whatever is the appropriate charge for recklessly rear-ending someone AND falsifying a police report, and the bitch should be done for drunk driving.

 

[Modular]

Awesome

 

[Freshgeardude]

Originally posted by: p2daall
I hope every single one of them lose their badges and does jail time.

that and I hope the girl gets the charges dropped. I wonder if they did the breathalizer test on her or just said "oh she is drunk, arrest her"

this is even more sickening to me than you guys, because I live literally 3 exits down from the Hollywood city in this vid.

 

[venkman]

Originally posted by: GodlessAstronomer
The girl was drunk. The cop should be charged with whatever is the appropriate charge for recklessly rear-ending someone AND falsifying a police report, and the bitch should be done for drunk driving.

Was she drunk though, or was it part of the fake report? Doesn't matter now, there is pretty much no way that she can be charged with anything now this story is out. I imagine the defense attorneys of those 27 other cases that these cops are material witness for are doing jumping jacks. A lot of guilty criminals are going to go back to the street because of these dumbass cops.

 

[jlee]

Originally posted by: Freshgeardude

Originally posted by: p2daall
I hope every single one of them lose their badges and does jail time.

that and I hope the girl gets the charges dropped. I wonder if they did the breathalizer test on her or just said "oh she is drunk, arrest her"

If she is guilty, why should she get off?

 

[p2daall]

Originally posted by: GodlessAstronomer
The girl was drunk. The cop should be charged with whatever is the appropriate charge for recklessly rear-ending someone AND falsifying a police report, and the bitch should be done for drunk driving.

She is innocent until proven guilty. Anything that has those officers names attached to it has no credibility. Its her word against the corrupt officers.

 

[jlee]

Originally posted by: p2daall

Originally posted by: GodlessAstronomer
The girl was drunk. The cop should be charged with whatever is the appropriate charge for recklessly rear-ending someone AND falsifying a police report, and the bitch should be done for drunk driving.

She is innocent until proven guilty. Anything that has those officers names attached to it has no credibility. Its her word against the corrupt officers.

The article lacks detail. If other officers administered field sobriety tests - or if these officers administered field sobriety tests on camera, if she submitted to breath or blood testing, etc. Nothing is stated.

Good job assuming, though.

 

[zerocool84]

Originally posted by: JLee

Originally posted by: p2daall

Originally posted by: GodlessAstronomer
The girl was drunk. The cop should be charged with whatever is the appropriate charge for recklessly rear-ending someone AND falsifying a police report, and the bitch should be done for drunk driving.

She is innocent until proven guilty. Anything that has those officers names attached to it has no credibility. Its her word against the corrupt officers.

The article lacks detail. If other officers administered field sobriety tests - or if these officers administered field sobriety tests on camera, if she submitted to breath or blood testing, etc. Nothing is stated.

Good job assuming, though.

But now she can lawyer up and say they just made that up as well and get the case thrown out depending on how they tested her but like you said we don't know all the details on this case but she'll try very hard to get out of this and I don't blame her.

 

[jlee]

Originally posted by: zerocool84

Originally posted by: JLee

Originally posted by: p2daall

Originally posted by: GodlessAstronomer
The girl was drunk. The cop should be charged with whatever is the appropriate charge for recklessly rear-ending someone AND falsifying a police report, and the bitch should be done for drunk driving.

She is innocent until proven guilty. Anything that has those officers names attached to it has no credibility. Its her word against the corrupt officers.

The article lacks detail. If other officers administered field sobriety tests - or if these officers administered field sobriety tests on camera, if she submitted to breath or blood testing, etc. Nothing is stated.

Good job assuming, though.

But now she can lawyer up and say they just made that up as well and get the case thrown out depending on how they tested her but like you said we don't know all the details on this case but she'll try very hard to get out of this and I don't blame her.

Her and thousands of other people...that's no surprise.

 

[GodlessAstronomer]

Originally posted by: zerocool84
But now she can lawyer up and say they just made that up as well and get the case thrown out depending on how they tested her but like you said we don't know all the details on this case but she'll try very hard to get out of this and I don't blame her.

Good point, this seems like the kind of case even the dumbest of lawyers could argue, unless she had a blood test back at the station where more witnesses were present. As it is anything that happened that was witnessed by only those who agreed to lie on the report can't be verified.

 

[rise]

rotten pigs.

 

[GodlessAstronomer]

Originally posted by: JLee


Her and thousands of other people...that's no surprise.

Well she has a damn good chance of getting off. The officers involved (note the plural) have already colluded to falsify the report, anything else that transpired that night is under question.

 

[jlee]

Originally posted by: GodlessAstronomer

Originally posted by: zerocool84
But now she can lawyer up and say they just made that up as well and get the case thrown out depending on how they tested her but like you said we don't know all the details on this case but she'll try very hard to get out of this and I don't blame her.

Good point, this seems like the kind of case even the dumbest of lawyers could argue, unless she had a blood test back at the station where more witnesses were present. As it is anything that happened that was witnessed by only those who agreed to lie on the report can't be verified.

You mean a blood test conducted at a medical facility by trained medical personnel? Kinda hard to fake that.

As I said, the article lacks detail.

 

[GodlessAstronomer]

Originally posted by: JLee

Originally posted by: GodlessAstronomer

Originally posted by: zerocool84
But now she can lawyer up and say they just made that up as well and get the case thrown out depending on how they tested her but like you said we don't know all the details on this case but she'll try very hard to get out of this and I don't blame her.

Good point, this seems like the kind of case even the dumbest of lawyers could argue, unless she had a blood test back at the station where more witnesses were present. As it is anything that happened that was witnessed by only those who agreed to lie on the report can't be verified.

You mean a blood test conducted at a medical facility by trained medical personnel? Kinda hard to fake that.

As I said, the article lacks detail.

Right, I'm not familiar with how these are conducted. But like I said, short of a blood test everything that these asswipe cops say is under question.

 

[tk149]

Originally posted by: p2daall
I hope every single one of them lose their badges and does jail time.

:thumbsup: They should also investigate the culture at the police station and find out if this sort of behavior is normal for this precinct.

 

[p2daall]

Originally posted by: GodlessAstronomer

Originally posted by: JLee


Her and thousands of other people...that's no surprise.

Well she has a damn good chance of getting off. The officers involved (note the plural) have already colluded to falsify the report, anything else that transpired that night is under question.

Anything those officers ever put their names on should be investigated. It shows that these officers do not follow standard ethics codes and their testimonies cannot be trusted.

 

[zerocool84]

Originally posted by: JLee

Originally posted by: zerocool84

Originally posted by: JLee

Originally posted by: p2daall

Originally posted by: GodlessAstronomer
The girl was drunk. The cop should be charged with whatever is the appropriate charge for recklessly rear-ending someone AND falsifying a police report, and the bitch should be done for drunk driving.

She is innocent until proven guilty. Anything that has those officers names attached to it has no credibility. Its her word against the corrupt officers.

The article lacks detail. If other officers administered field sobriety tests - or if these officers administered field sobriety tests on camera, if she submitted to breath or blood testing, etc. Nothing is stated.

Good job assuming, though.

But now she can lawyer up and say they just made that up as well and get the case thrown out depending on how they tested her but like you said we don't know all the details on this case but she'll try very hard to get out of this and I don't blame her.

Her and thousands of other people...that's no surprise.

Well duh, they legally have the right to use the law/courtsystem legally to it's fullest extent to disprove what they allegedly did. Nothing wrong with that. If I ever got into trouble legally I'd do the same.

 

[jlee]

Originally posted by: zerocool84

Originally posted by: JLee


Her and thousands of other people...that's no surprise.

Well duh, they legally have the right to use the law/courtsystem legally to it's fullest extent to disprove what they allegedly did. Nothing wrong with that. If I ever got into trouble legally I'd do the same.

That was kinda my point.

 

[zerocool84]

Originally posted by: JLee

Originally posted by: zerocool84

Originally posted by: JLee


Her and thousands of other people...that's no surprise.

Well duh, they legally have the right to use the law/courtsystem legally to it's fullest extent to disprove what they allegedly did. Nothing wrong with that. If I ever got into trouble legally I'd do the same.

That was kinda my point.

lol well duh to me

 

[DayLaPaul]

Originally posted by: JLee

Originally posted by: Freshgeardude

Originally posted by: p2daall
I hope every single one of them lose their badges and does jail time.

that and I hope the girl gets the charges dropped. I wonder if they did the breathalizer test on her or just said "oh she is drunk, arrest her"

If she is guilty, why should she get off?

It could be argued that the stop was illegal, since it was initiated because of the officer's own incompetence. Thus, everything that happened after the illegal stop should be thrown out.

I remember a case a while back involving Steve McNair (yes, same guy that just died) being pulled over on suspicion of DUI. During the stop, they found an illegal handgun in the car. Even though McNair was legally drunk and the gun was clearly in his car, this case was thrown out by the judge because the stop was deemed illegal.

Apparently the police dash cam revealed that, although he was swerving, he still remained in his lane the whole time, which is completely legal in that jurisdiction. Therefore, everything that happened after the stop was immaterial.

Of course, your everyday public defender isn't going to be able to pull off that defense, but the precedent is there and I'm sure it didn't start with the McNair case either.

 

[arkcom]

Originally posted by: DayLaPaul

Originally posted by: JLee

Originally posted by: Freshgeardude

Originally posted by: p2daall
I hope every single one of them lose their badges and does jail time.

that and I hope the girl gets the charges dropped. I wonder if they did the breathalizer test on her or just said "oh she is drunk, arrest her"

If she is guilty, why should she get off?

It could be argued that the stop was illegal, since it was initiated because of the officer's own incompetence. Thus, everything that happened after the illegal stop should be thrown out.

I remember a case a while back involving Steve McNair (yes, same guy that just died) being pulled over on suspicion of DUI. During the stop, they found an illegal handgun in the car. Even though McNair was legally drunk and the gun was clearly in his car, this case was thrown out by the judge because the stop was deemed illegal.

Apparently the police dash cam revealed that, although he was swerving, he still remained in his lane the whole time, which is completely legal in that jurisdiction. Therefore, everything that happened after the stop was immaterial.

Of course, your everyday public defender isn't going to be able to pull off that defense, but the precedent is there and I'm sure it didn't start with the McNair case either.

Here in Arkansas, police can pull you over if it looks like someone in the car is not wearing a seatbelt. There really are no illegal stops here.

 

[smack Down]

Originally posted by: JLee

Originally posted by: p2daall

Originally posted by: GodlessAstronomer
The girl was drunk. The cop should be charged with whatever is the appropriate charge for recklessly rear-ending someone AND falsifying a police report, and the bitch should be done for drunk driving.

She is innocent until proven guilty. Anything that has those officers names attached to it has no credibility. Its her word against the corrupt officers.

The article lacks detail. If other officers administered field sobriety tests - or if these officers administered field sobriety tests on camera, if she submitted to breath or blood testing, etc. Nothing is stated.

Good job assuming, though.

Doesn't matter much, even if they have blood test they are still not going to get conviction.

What are they going to do call the lying pigs to testify? Just having the blood test is useless if you can't have the police testify that she was driving.