I was waiting for that argument...it didnt' take long...Originally posted by: kage69
While I certainly don't condone that kind of barbarism, Christianity itself is no stranger to similar practices. Let us not forget the warm and friendly fires of the Inquisition, or the pain and suffering wrought by multiple Crusades.
It's all just one big pissing contest amoung the cults, move along, nothing to see here.
Originally posted by: alchemize
I was waiting for that argument...it didnt' take long...Originally posted by: kage69
While I certainly don't condone that kind of barbarism, Christianity itself is no stranger to similar practices. Let us not forget the warm and friendly fires of the Inquisition, or the pain and suffering wrought by multiple Crusades.
It's all just one big pissing contest amoung the cults, move along, nothing to see here.
It's been 100's of years since Christianity was barbaric on any kind of organized scale.
This is TODAY.
Plenty to see, certainly nothing to move along about. Your argument has no merit (or possibly merit as a footnote of "hey you guys did it 100's of years ago". Poor attempt at moral equivalence.
Arguing that the german actions against the Jews was based on religious motiviations is a joke. There was no attempt to convert, only exterminate. Why also gypsies? Why also intellectuals and Poles? Why Russians?Originally posted by: lozina
Originally posted by: alchemize
I was waiting for that argument...it didnt' take long...Originally posted by: kage69
While I certainly don't condone that kind of barbarism, Christianity itself is no stranger to similar practices. Let us not forget the warm and friendly fires of the Inquisition, or the pain and suffering wrought by multiple Crusades.
It's all just one big pissing contest amoung the cults, move along, nothing to see here.
It's been 100's of years since Christianity was barbaric on any kind of organized scale.
This is TODAY.
Plenty to see, certainly nothing to move along about. Your argument has no merit (or possibly merit as a footnote of "hey you guys did it 100's of years ago". Poor attempt at moral equivalence.
so in 2050, when the holocaust has aged by over 100 years, will it cease to be a significant event?
Originally posted by: alchemize
I was waiting for that argument...it didnt' take long... It's been 100's of years since Christianity was barbaric on any kind of organized scale. This is TODAY. Plenty to see, certainly nothing to move along about. Your argument has no merit (or possibly merit as a footnote of "hey you guys did it 100's of years ago". Poor attempt at moral equivalence.Originally posted by: kage69 While I certainly don't condone that kind of barbarism, Christianity itself is no stranger to similar practices. Let us not forget the warm and friendly fires of the Inquisition, or the pain and suffering wrought by multiple Crusades. It's all just one big pissing contest amoung the cults, move along, nothing to see here.
Originally posted by: dpm
Originally posted by: alchemize
I was waiting for that argument...it didnt' take long... It's been 100's of years since Christianity was barbaric on any kind of organized scale. This is TODAY. Plenty to see, certainly nothing to move along about. Your argument has no merit (or possibly merit as a footnote of "hey you guys did it 100's of years ago". Poor attempt at moral equivalence.Originally posted by: kage69 While I certainly don't condone that kind of barbarism, Christianity itself is no stranger to similar practices. Let us not forget the warm and friendly fires of the Inquisition, or the pain and suffering wrought by multiple Crusades. It's all just one big pissing contest amoung the cults, move along, nothing to see here.
Actually, I think (hope) that kage69 was simply trying to say that we should not tar all of Islam with the same brush, just as we should not judge Christianity by the Crusades, the Inquisition, the treatment of Jews in the 1400s etc. That this is horrible, and must be condemned, there is no doubt.
I was waiting for that argument...it didnt' take long...
Your hope is misplaced I think...I've read too many of Kage69's posts.
Originally posted by: alchemize
I was waiting for that argument...it didnt' take long...Originally posted by: kage69
While I certainly don't condone that kind of barbarism, Christianity itself is no stranger to similar practices. Let us not forget the warm and friendly fires of the Inquisition, or the pain and suffering wrought by multiple Crusades.
It's all just one big pissing contest amoung the cults, move along, nothing to see here.
It's been 100's of years since Christianity was barbaric on any kind of organized scale.
This is TODAY.
Plenty to see, certainly nothing to move along about. Your argument has no merit (or possibly merit as a footnote of "hey you guys did it 100's of years ago". Poor attempt at moral equivalence.
Originally posted by: kage69
Your hope is misplaced I think...I've read too many of Kage69's posts.
Feel free to elaborate on that.
Small beliefs for small minds. These holy-rollers need to get a friggin clue.
Makes me wonder how all this would be panning out if religion wasn't around...
Yet another reason why we need an administration that can check their religious subscription at the White House door.
What I have said respecting and against religion, I mean strictly to apply to the slaveholding religion of this land, and with no possible reference to Christianity proper; for, between the Christianity of this land, and the Christianity of Christ, I recognize the widest possible difference?so wide, that to receive the one as good, pure, and holy, is of necessity to reject the other as bad, corrupt, and wicked. To be the friend of the one, is of necessity to be the enemy of the other. I love the pure, peaceable, and impartial Christianity of Christ: I therefore hate the corrupt, slaveholding, women-whipping, cradle-plundering, partial and hypocritical Christianity of this land. Indeed, I can see no reason, but the most deceitful one, for calling the religion of this land Christianity.
Again...no attempt to convert. That was the equivalent of Tutsi's versus Hutu's...Originally posted by: tnitsuj
Originally posted by: alchemize
I was waiting for that argument...it didnt' take long...Originally posted by: kage69
While I certainly don't condone that kind of barbarism, Christianity itself is no stranger to similar practices. Let us not forget the warm and friendly fires of the Inquisition, or the pain and suffering wrought by multiple Crusades.
It's all just one big pissing contest amoung the cults, move along, nothing to see here.
It's been 100's of years since Christianity was barbaric on any kind of organized scale.
This is TODAY.
Plenty to see, certainly nothing to move along about. Your argument has no merit (or possibly merit as a footnote of "hey you guys did it 100's of years ago". Poor attempt at moral equivalence.
Um Bosnia? Croatia? Sarejevo, Serebinca, Concetration camps for Muslims?
You appear to have issues with religion, in general.
Originally posted by: alchemize
Again...no attempt to convert. That was the equivalent of Tutsi's versus Hutu's... The point of this post was the barbaric forcing of conversion to a religion, not just old fashioned mass killing of your neighbors.Originally posted by: tnitsujUm Bosnia? Croatia? Sarejevo, Serebinca, Concetration camps for Muslims?
Let me be the first conservative to say, that was very inppropriate flamebait.Originally posted by: ncircle
a few well placed warheads would rid us of this plague.
Let me be the first conservative to say, that was very inppropriate flamebait.
Originally posted by: alchemize
Let me be the first conservative to say, that was very inppropriate flamebait.Originally posted by: ncircle
a few well placed warheads would rid us of this plague.
I didn't say you were flaming, I said you were baiting.Originally posted by: ncircle
Originally posted by: alchemize
Let me be the first conservative to say, that was very inppropriate flamebait.Originally posted by: ncircle
a few well placed warheads would rid us of this plague.
who said i was flaming?
it may seem outrageous..i guess
i assure you it was not said in jest.
You reveal your bias.that Israeli soldiers who open fire on civilians or jewish extremists who go into Mosques and open fire on people praying think they are evil...