Consumers Head Toward Faster Ways of Eating

Amused

Elite Member
Apr 14, 2001
57,039
18,350
146
Consumers Head Toward Faster Ways of Eating
Dashboard Dining Becoming a Major Force in the Grocery Industry
By J.M. HIRSCH, AP


(Aug. 25) - Spoons are so old school. And so slow. Harried Americans searching for ways to shave precious seconds from their dining routines have seized on a slew of new foods designed to keep them on the go - no utensils needed.

There's soup in heat-and-sip cups. There's yogurt in squeeze tubes. Mini cookies in snazzy little cans that fit in car cup holders. There are even frozen peanut butter and jelly sandwiches - crustless for the little ones.

''It's all about instantaneous gratification,'' said Kara Romanow, a consumer products analyst at AMR Research in Boston. ''If you can have spray butter, isn't that better than having to cut butter and melt it before you use it?''

Long a factor in the fast food restaurant world, so-called dashboard dining has become a major force in the grocery industry.

For many manufacturers, catering to consumers demanding convenience has meant coming up with kid- and car-friendly packaging first and worrying about how to fit their foods in it later.

Such was the case with Squeezers, Stonyfield Farm's entry in the yogurt-in-a-tube category. Getting a piece of that popular market meant spending a year retooling the New Hampshire company's yogurt recipe to work in toothpaste tube-like packaging.

''We're moving toward the consumer instead of asking the consumer to come to us,'' Stonyfield founder Gary Hirshberg said recently. ''I couldn't necessarily put a dollar amount to (the development cost), but it was huge.''

More companies are recognizing that food packaging can be more than a pretty label, affecting not just whether consumers use a product over a competitor's, but also how they use it.

Call it the food performance factor. Potato chips can't merely taste, look and smell good; they also have to work well.

How do chips work well? Depends on your target audience. For moms, single serving cups that keep chips intact inside lunch boxes might do it. For frat boys, it could be a ring-shaped container ready to accommodate a bowl of dip.

People are as drawn to a product as they are to how its package lets them use it, Romanow said. And they want to use it fast, easily, and increasingly, on the road.

As a result, scores of products - from soups to chips to energy bars - now come in cup holder-friendly containers.

Automobile manufacturers know this. During the past 10 years, minivans went from two cup holders to 12 or more, including special rectangular ones for drink boxes, according to Consumer Reports magazine.

The Campbell Soup Co. spent two years adapting its soups for cup holder containers. It's Soup at Hand line offers 13 varieties of drinkable soups with smaller noodles and chicken bits that won't clog the soda can-style sip hole.

The company's iconic ''M'm! M'm! Good!'' jingle has become ''M'm! M'm! Good! To Go.''

It isn't just a matter of answering the call for convenience, said Campbell's spokesman John Faulkner. It's also about desire, and companies want to be there - soup or snack in hand - whenever and wherever desire strikes.

Having the right product for that desire can mean big sales. Campbell's portable soups brought in $250 million last year.

''From a strategic point of view it increases the possible number of eating occasions, which obviously helps the company sell more products,'' said John Lord, chairman of the food marketing department at St. Joseph's University in Philadelphia.

It also exposes existing products to new populations. For Stonyfield, Squeezers made its organic yogurts more appealing to children who want novelty and to adults who want convenience foods that also are all natural.

Of course, catering to convenience is no guarantee of success. Plenty of products fail, convenient packaging or not.

Remember the milk that didn't have to be refrigerated? Probably not. Even though it's a boon to long-term storage and is a staple in Europe, shelf-stable milk has yet to catch on in the United States.

Portability isn't the only convenience factor that's reshaping food. Portion control also has prompted changes. Nabisco recently rolled out ''thin crisp'' versions of popular cookies, including Oreos, in 100-calorie packages.

But convenience isn't cheap. A container of Soup at Hand Creamy Tomato costs $1.50 and has one serving. The same size can of Campbell's condensed tomato soup is 50 cents and has 2 1/2 servings.

Nabisco's bear-shaped Teddy Grahams cookies cost $1.49 for a 3 1/4-ounce cup holder container. That costs $3 more per pound than buying them in the standard 10-ounce box.

But for many consumers, that's not the point. Saving time is just as much a bargain, if not more, than getting a good price, said food packaging consultant Aaron Brody.

A traditional can of soup may be cheaper, he said, ''but what are you going to with that can while you're driving up Interstate 93? Do you have a can opener? Do you have a microwave? Will it fit in the car?''
 

eakers

Lifer
Aug 14, 2000
12,169
2
0
eating while driving is bad news!

i dunno, i'd rather sit and enjoy my food myself. but thats just me.
 

SaltBoy

Diamond Member
Aug 13, 2001
8,975
11
81
I think people in today's society need to take a step back and kill their own food before they cook and eat it.
 

Amused

Elite Member
Apr 14, 2001
57,039
18,350
146
Originally posted by: eakers
eating while driving is bad news!

Funny how there is no outcry over eating and driving like there is over cell phones.
 

eakers

Lifer
Aug 14, 2000
12,169
2
0
Originally posted by: Amused
Originally posted by: eakers
eating while driving is bad news!

Funny how there is no outcry over eating and driving like there is over cell phones.
i was told that more accidents are caused by people trying to not spill their coffee/food on them while driving than cell phones.

dunno how true it is but it makes good sense.
 

Hayabusa Rider

Admin Emeritus & Elite Member
Jan 26, 2000
50,879
4,267
126
Originally posted by: Amused
Originally posted by: eakers
eating while driving is bad news!

Funny how there is no outcry over eating and driving like there is over cell phones.

The problem with cell phones is that people CAN get lost in conversation, while people rarely speak to their burger.

While I don't think that cell phones in general are the threat they are made out to be, my last car was the victim of an 18 yr old talking on her phone. She didn't notice the line of 15 or so cars stopped in front of her as she plowed into me at an estimated 35 mph, on a bright sunny day without obstruction.

Anyway, on topic, as you know Americans are getting chubbier. I have always thought that one reason is that we are in so much of a hurry that we havent time to get full. We just toss down whatever before the feedback mechanism telling us we are full can kick in.

What you posted about doesn't help the situation any.
 

Amused

Elite Member
Apr 14, 2001
57,039
18,350
146
Originally posted by: WinstonSmith
Originally posted by: Amused
Originally posted by: eakers
eating while driving is bad news!

Funny how there is no outcry over eating and driving like there is over cell phones.

The problem with cell phones is that people CAN get lost in conversation, while people rarely speak to their burger.

While I don't think that cell phones in general are the threat they are made out to be, my last car was the victim of an 18 yr old talking on her phone. She didn't notice the line of 15 or so cars stopped in front of her as she plowed into me at an estimated 35 mph, on a bright sunny day without obstruction.

Sorry for your loss. :(

But my position is the same. ALL distractions are bad, and cell phones have been targeted because they are so easily seen by other drivers AND new. Personally I don't think they are any worse than holding a conversation with a passenger (especially a back seat passenger)... but folks have all sorts of "what ifs" to try and prove they are.
 

K1052

Elite Member
Aug 21, 2003
51,153
43,253
136
For some reason this thread makes me crave Steak n' Shake.:confused:
 

Hayabusa Rider

Admin Emeritus & Elite Member
Jan 26, 2000
50,879
4,267
126
Originally posted by: Amused
Originally posted by: WinstonSmith
Originally posted by: Amused
Originally posted by: eakers
eating while driving is bad news!

Funny how there is no outcry over eating and driving like there is over cell phones.

The problem with cell phones is that people CAN get lost in conversation, while people rarely speak to their burger.

While I don't think that cell phones in general are the threat they are made out to be, my last car was the victim of an 18 yr old talking on her phone. She didn't notice the line of 15 or so cars stopped in front of her as she plowed into me at an estimated 35 mph, on a bright sunny day without obstruction.

Sorry for your loss. :(

But my position is the same. ALL distractions are bad, and cell phones have been targeted because they are so easily seen by other drivers AND new. Personally I don't think they are any worse than holding a conversation with a passenger (especially a back seat passenger)... but folks have all sorts of "what ifs" to try and prove they are.


I would like to see some real hard evidence before banning anything along these lines.

In reality how often does what happened to me occur? I have no idea.

NY has this stupidly justified ban on hand held cell phones.

Two points about it..

1). It still allows for it's use. If people are distracted, how does it matter what they speak into?

2) (and worse) The law was passed because the politicans determined that cell phone usage as it existed was dangerous. So, they decided that the monies collected by fines should go to fund a study to see if cell phones pose a driving hazard. :confused:

Until things are clearer, I would prefer that the States limit their legislation to determining fact before action.