Consumer Broadband and Digital Television Promotion Act

dmcowen674

No Lifer
Oct 13, 1999
54,889
47
91
www.alienbabeltech.com
9-21-2003 'Trusted computers' are a wolf in sheep's clothing

What would such a "platform" do? Oh, not much. It would make it impossible for your computer to use any hardware or software that's not approved by the Trusted Computing Group. It would prevent you from using your computer for any purpose that the group hasn't approved of, and would notify them (or the government) if you attempt to do otherwise. And it would be impossible for you (the consumer) to remove, decrypt or disable (just like the lavatory smoke detectors on airplanes).

The presence of a Trusted Platform Module would make your computer a captive of the Trusted Computer Group, which would -- by force of law, if it has its way -- ensure that you use it only for purposes of its liking. It would place the computer not under your control, but under the control of the group, which is controlled by large corporations through direct membership, or through other arrangements.

Think of the possibilities. Disney could have an arrangement that the "trusted" computer would not play any of its DVDs unless a fee had been paid. The music industry could work out an arrangement so the "trusted" computer would only play music CDs a certain number of times, or only at certain times, unless additional fees were paid. According to one group that opposes the trusted computing platform group, with this mechanism in place, you'd only be able to rent software, not buy it, and once your "rent" is up, and unless you pay more "rent," the software you've downloaded would stop working and possibly even erase the files you already created.

Don't stop there. Think of additional "freedoms" made possible by the beneficence of the group, if it gets its way. Remote censorship would be possible. Documents could be remotely erased if they fall into a category deemed by the group to be offensive, inappropriate, politically incorrect, or whatever.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Between the DMCA and this, the Digital Information Age at least in the U.S. will be over and done. Way To Go U.S.A.
 

Wag

Diamond Member
Jul 21, 2000
8,288
8
81
This will never fly.

The MPAA was trying to have complete controll over home content for years, and just last week all the cable companies agreed to allow firewire output (archiving) for every single digital cable box if the customer wants it. Of course there will be restrictions on content, but end-users will be able to make at least 1 copy of all premium content (HBO, SHO, etc) and unlimited recording of regular channels. A big victory for the home user.

 

BaliBabyDoc

Lifer
Jan 20, 2001
10,737
0
0
The truth is most home users will favor digital re-broadcasts unless they can capture true digital quality output (to DVD). Even with this capability many will still watch movies at the time they are re-broadcast (ad infinitum on HBO) b/c we are lazy and watch unreasonable amounts of opportunistic TV . . . ie Americans are sitting at home flipping the channels until we find something somewhat worthwhile to view. I think premium channels have nothing to fear but the MPAA should be shaking in their wing tips b/c reasonable people are not going to replace VHS with $20 a pop DVDs (I'm talking about movies produced before DVDs were popular). And many new movies are out on PPV merely months after the $1 theaters.
 

Tab

Lifer
Sep 15, 2002
12,145
0
76
It'll never work, even if it did someone would crack it or everyone would buy the products that dont have it.
 

daniel1113

Diamond Member
Jun 6, 2003
6,448
0
0
Originally posted by: Tabb
It'll never work, even if it did someone would crack it or everyone would buy the products that dont have it.

Exactly. I don't know why entertainment companies, the RIAA, and other such organizations don't understand this simple idea. No matter what they come up with to "protect" their content, someone WILL crack it.
 

BaliBabyDoc

Lifer
Jan 20, 2001
10,737
0
0
They should take the moral route. Most people are basically decent and would pay "reasonable" prices for entertainment. Unfortunately, they've (industry) flooded the market with overpriced, poor quality "art" and now they are complaining about fewer people willing to pay for it.

Universal (?) has the right idea in dramatically cutting costs. Apple has the right idea in offering people what they want. Napster was theft. Kazaa, Shareaza, Morpheus, WinMX, Qtrax, et al are all novel forms of media exchange that should be exploited by media companies as free advertisement. The music industry could learn a lesson or two from banks (ATM) and drug dealers.
 

Wag

Diamond Member
Jul 21, 2000
8,288
8
81
The agreement the cable industry signed shows that they're more reasonable than the MPAA. It surprised alot of us that a big company like Comcast would sign on to this agreement (they were onboard with providing the consumer no means of archiving. I think everyone came to the realization that after 30yrs of VCRs, consumers wouldn't accept not being able to save their favorite show (not just PVRs).
 

dmcowen674

No Lifer
Oct 13, 1999
54,889
47
91
www.alienbabeltech.com
Originally posted by: daniel1113
Originally posted by: Tabb
It'll never work, even if it did someone would crack it or everyone would buy the products that dont have it.

Exactly. I don't know why entertainment companies, the RIAA, and other such organizations don't understand this simple idea. No matter what they come up with to "protect" their content, someone WILL crack it.

Under this Law as well as the DMCA a lot of people will be in the U.S. prison system as Felons if they even breathe a word to another person much less post a link on the Internet about "How To Crack" the system.


 

daniel1113

Diamond Member
Jun 6, 2003
6,448
0
0
I guess they'll just have to send 60 million Americans to prison. That will solve the problem...
 

Red Dawn

Elite Member
Jun 4, 2001
57,529
3
0
Originally posted by: daniel1113
I guess they'll just have to send 60 million Americans to prison. That will solve the problem...
Well having that kind of power over a political opponent has worked for years for repressive regimes in S. America, the Middle East and Eastern Europe