Conservative Morals & Lifestyle.

[OutHouse]

Nope, and you're starting to sound like michal1980. If that is what you going for keep at it.

boo hooo did hurt your itty bitty feelings?

funny how you attacked me and didnt answer thew question

 

[Meghan54]

Obama just called us all sinners and don't deserve God's grace. Why aren't liberals foaming at the mouth over that?

Where? Certainly not in that CNN link you provided. Perhaps you have another source that shows him calling everyone sinners during the eulogy.

 

[brycejones]

and the hypocrites reveal themselves. :biggrin:

boo hooo did hurt your itty bitty feelings?

funny how you attacked me and didnt answer thew question

What question? You didn't ask one you made a statement.

Since you are now choosing to post like michal1980 please get some chalk you'll need it so you can keep playing the victim card.

Also here is your new avatar:

 

[Newell Steamer]

Shens. Obama is a muslim. I'm pretty sure he can't even speak english.

Or, when he does speak in English, it is from memory.

After all, we all know why he is here:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Taqiya

 

[MongGrel]

Nope, and you're starting to sound like michal1980. If that is what you are going for keep at it.

He is heading that way.

 

[shira]

so with all the flaming democrat atheist on this board why are they not flaming Obama for preaching on the pulpit, calling us all sinners and we don't deserve the grace of God?

just curious since it seems like the flaming democrat atheists in here think all democrats are atheist and poor and any mention of God by a government official is grounds for being burned at the stake.

if the brain dead OP can ask a dumbass question on why republicans arent calling the Palins out then i can ask why the democrats aren't calling Obama out.

Did Obama father any out-of-wedlock children? Did his wife have any out-of-wedlock children? Did his daughters? And do any of them preach abstinence for speaking fees?

Sounds like Obama isn't being a hypocrite, unlike some right-wing, abstinence-preaching, double unwed-mother we know of.

So shaddup.

 

[Doc Savage Fan]

Did Obama father any out-of-wedlock children? Did his wife have any out-of-wedlock children? Did his daughters? And do any of them preach abstinence for speaking fees?

Sounds like Obama isn't being a hypocrite, unlike some right-wing, abstinence-preaching, double unwed-mother we know of.

So shaddup.

Obama has been a hypocrite on a shitload of issues. Or is that different somehow?

 

[Victorian Gray]

Obama has been a hypocrite on a shitload of issues. Or is that different somehow?

So, Obama is a hypocrite so it's ok for Bristol Palin to be a (well paid) hypocrite?

 

[Moonbeam]

Conservative brain defectives are in the habit of mouthing off about their moral superiority to liberals It is this pig stupid arrogance that cause them grief when they show themselves to be full of moral failings. When you denigrate others you will find that what goes around comes around in spades.

The issue is not who has moral failings. Generally we all fail somewhere sometimes, but it is conservatives that grind the moral axe more than liberals do and they who start the problem of finger pointing in the first place. The equivalency defense doesn't cut it.

 

[sandorski]

for most of the stuff against palin i just don't give a fuck. Though this. she Promotes abstinence only for sex ed and she goes and gets knocked up again out of wedlock.


but fuck i agree with whoever said let these fucknuts faid into obscurity.

I agree and everything, but it's "fade" and not "faid". [/condescending douchebag]

 

[boomerang]

When I saw that headline on MSN, I was wondering why they thought anyone would give a sh.t.

Newell Steamer gives a shit enough to start a thread about it. That's who they were reaching out to. He's their target audience and they know very well what sets him off.

As well as all the other usual suspects that have joined the thread. As long as we have simple minds that thrive on simple thoughts, we will have headlines like those on MSN. The need, it's being fulfilled.

 

[sandorski]

Newell Steamer gives a shit enough to start a thread about it. That's who they were reaching out to. He's their target audience and they know very well what sets him off.

As well as all the other usual suspects that have joined the thread. As long as we have simple minds that thrive on simple thoughts, we will have headlines like those on MSN. The need, it's being fulfilled.

Indeed.

 

[CZroe]

Bristol Palin is pregnant with a 2nd child - still out of wedlock (no longer engaged either).

http://www.msnbc.com/msnbc/bristol-palin-announces-shes-pregnant-second-child-emotional-post

Where is the Right in bashing this unwed mother of (soon to be) two? Why aren't her actions scrutinized by the usual Righthadists?

What makes you think conservatives approve? Liberal kids do things that get them in trouble with their liberal parents just like conservative kids do things that get them in trouble with their conservative parents. It isn't some contradiction.

It's not like her mother can force her daughter to carry the same values. It's almost like you've never heard the stereotype about conservative children being the first to rebel, like the "preacher's son." Most stereotypes have a basis in truth. Do you have any idea how many Christian conservatives have trouble keeping their kids in line?

 

[TheSlamma]

What makes you think conservatives approve? Liberal kids do things that get them in trouble with their liberal parents just like conservative kids do things that get them in trouble with their conservative parents. It isn't some contradiction.

It's not like her mother can force her daughter to carry the same values. It's almost like you've never heard the stereotype about conservative children being the first to rebel, like the "preacher's son." Most stereotypes have a basis in truth. Do you have any idea how many Christian conservatives have trouble keeping their kids in line?

It's just the typical run of bias around here. These guys come out of the woodwork when the "other" team is a hypocrite, but then scatter and all you hear is crickets when their team does it.

The pacific trade agreement where Mitch Mcconnel and his corporate buddies are 1 step shy of drooling all over the place cause of "Obamas trade bill" passing, the same one that the Dems hated at first but then all of a sudden on the next go round it passes a Dem senate majority is just one recent event example. It's not even selective memory as it JUST HAPPENED and yet, no Dems talking about it.. Strange :hmm:

 

[Moonbeam]

The conservative brain defect is morally arrogant. It is the ego that has been conditioned by threat of moral approbation to conform to all manner of delusional moral standards. It attempts top violate the laws of nature that you can build a castle of moral superiority on the sands of ego instead of the bedrock of humility, that the bigger an ass you are the harder you will fall. When your aim Emperor in false moral garments and to infect the culture with your false moral crown, expect to see the day arrive when your panties fall down and the laughter spreads.

We create what we fear and the conservative brain defect is all about fear.

 

[hal2kilo]

Shouldn't Jeb be shaming her?

Nice!

 

[kinev]

Member of the "right" here:

She should be more responsible and now she'll have to live with the consequences of her behavior. If she gets on any state/federal funding, she's making others pay for her mistakes. The children aren't mistakes, but the behavior was.

She is also a hypocrite. I can see why she became a spokesperson for abstinence only education after her first child; something like "Listen, I thought it wouldn't happen to me and it did and now it is so difficult raising this child alone...don't be like me". But, now that it's happened a second time, she deserves the mocking that she is getting for being a hypocrite.

Happy?

 

[hal2kilo]

kinda like the pope or Jimmy Carter getting shit for actually behaving like how Jesus said they should?

:thumbsup::thumbsup::thumbsup::thumbsup:

 

[CZroe]

Member of the "right" here:

She should be more responsible and now she'll have to live with the consequences of her behavior. If she gets on any state/federal funding, she's making others pay for her mistakes. The children aren't mistakes, but the behavior was.

She is also a hypocrite. I can see why she became a spokesperson for abstinence only education after her first child; something like "Listen, I thought it wouldn't happen to me and it did and now it is so difficult raising this child alone...don't be like me". But, now that it's happened a second time, she deserves the mocking that she is getting for being a hypocrite.

Happy?

Except that these defective intellects are attacking the mother and unrelated conservatives as if the actions of this hypocrite have anything to do with contradicting other conservatives. Is the girl even claiming to be a conservative herself?

 

[Brainonska511]

Member of the "right" here:

She should be more responsible and now she'll have to live with the consequences of her behavior. If she gets on any state/federal funding, she's making others pay for her mistakes. The children aren't mistakes, but the behavior was.

She is also a hypocrite. I can see why she became a spokesperson for abstinence only education after her first child; something like "Listen, I thought it wouldn't happen to me and it did and now it is so difficult raising this child alone...don't be like me". But, now that it's happened a second time, she deserves the mocking that she is getting for being a hypocrite.

Happy?

Sure, there's a part of me that wants to mock, given the obvious hypocrisy. But we should strive for our better nature and instead use this as an opportunity for re-examining platforms and changing the nature of this conversation.

By providing comprehensive sex education, family planning, and easy access to multiple forms of birth control we can simultaneously cut down on the number of people needing assistance due to unplanned children and reduce the number of abortions. Those seem like laudable goals. And it seems that some of those things could easily be worked into a republican platform, if it was framed properly.

Instead, republican candidates are doubling down on stupid and always seem to come across as heartless and focusing on the minutia, as if each individual issue, from abortion, to welfare are isolated bubbles and ignoring realities. They seem to only give a crap about "people" in two cases: before they're born and after they're a vegetable. Cutting funding to family planning, pushing abstinence-only education, pushing for harder access to birth control, cutting funding to welfare, using the government to interfere in personal medical decisions (eg: Terry Schiavo)...

 

[justoh]

shit happens, and because of their strongly held convictions the kids could have been assured all along that, worst case scenario, they can just have a baby. And then the smugness of the not having an abortion will cancel out the negligence of not using birth control, because their reality is based on the revealed knowledge of a fellow primate rather than on reason.

but obviously, yes, they aren't heartless. Please try have sympathy for the religious people. Okay guys? A lot of you seem a little harsh. It extends to their commitment to opposing gay marriage as well. Let's not lose sight of the message: it's because they're stupid, not heartless.

 

[WHAMPOM]

Member of the "right" here:

She should be more responsible and now she'll have to live with the consequences of her behavior. If she gets on any state/federal funding, she's making others pay for her mistakes. The children aren't mistakes, but the behavior was.

She is also a hypocrite. I can see why she became a spokesperson for abstinence only education after her first child; something like "Listen, I thought it wouldn't happen to me and it did and now it is so difficult raising this child alone...don't be like me". But, now that it's happened a second time, she deserves the mocking that she is getting for being a hypocrite.

Happy?

Don't you mean "I was an ignorant slut too stupid to use a contraceptive and I want you all to be just like me." "And the big plus is I get paid for it!"

 

[WHAMPOM]

Obama just called us all sinners and don't deserve God's grace. Why aren't liberals foaming at the mouth over that?

Why do you hate religion, doesn't every preacher-man call his flock "SINNERS!"

 

[WHAMPOM]

so with all the flaming democrat atheist on this board why are they not flaming Obama for preaching on the pulpit, calling us all sinners and we don't deserve the grace of God?

just curious since it seems like the flaming democrat atheists in here think all democrats are atheist and poor and any mention of God by a government official is grounds for being burned at the stake.

if the brain dead OP can ask a dumbass question on why republicans arent calling the Palins out then i can ask why the democrats aren't calling Obama out.

You are just taking it personally 'cause it was directed at you/only in your own mind. Just let the whine out, we don't mind, the ignore function is a Godsend.

 

[CZroe]

Obama just called us all sinners and don't deserve God's grace. Why aren't liberals foaming at the mouth over that?

Uhh, that's the basis of Christianity. He sent his son to die for our sins "...for all have sinned and come short of the glory of the Lord." The point is that Jesus saved those willing to accept his sacrifice and that they were all doomed to eternal damnation, which is what they "deserved."

It's the basis of Judaism too. At "The Fall" they were kicked out of the Garden of Eden and told that Adam and Eve's sin would be passed down from generation to generation. His children were instructed to atone for their sin with ritualistic sacrifices of doves and lambs and such.