If that's the case what is this all about?
https://www.aids.gov/hiv-aids-basics/hiv-aids-101/statistics/
My knee jerk reaction was to disagree with him also but according to these statistics he is correct.
Well, I am mistaken. I welcome nails to be pounded into my hands. One of the faults of us libruuls is that we have to defend, constantly. I should have never even brought up that statistic, besides the fact that I was wrong, because it's irrelevant.
That said, let me change my point.
Male on male sex requires anal penetration. Sorry for all of you who have queasy stomachs. Reality isn't all Disney.
Anus/rectal epithelium is very thin, and also very vascular. That means blood to all y'all laymen out there. It tears very easily, and There Will Be Blood.
So, yes. The lunatic is 100% correct, anal penetration without use of a condom results in high incidence of AIDS and other disease transmission.
Same as sharing a needle. Same as childbirth.
So, if you want to ignore the biological reason for why AIDS is transmitted highly among gay men, then go for it.
Of course, none of that has anything to do with "morals".
Morals are arbitrary and fleeting. And two gay men having sex is about as immoral as two straight people having sex, as far as I'm concerned.
Sorry for saying something demonstrably incorrect. As a liberal who lives and breaths observable reality, I recant.