Originally posted by: Zebo
Wonder why the are so adamant and fighting to keep this "energy" meeting so secret?
Text
Originally posted by: Zebo
Wonder why the are so adamant and fighting to keep this "energy" meeting so secret?
Text
Originally posted by: conehead433
"Well Cheney also had infrastructure maps of other oil producing countries. I guess we will invade those later? Also is it wrong to know about the infrastrcture of an oil producing country if we are buying oil from them? "
I think that should read, " Is it wrong to know about the infrastructure of an oil producing country if we are going to invade, so we won't be blowing up what we've come to get? "
Judicial Watch isn't claiming that the documents are proof of any particular intent but says they should be open to public scrutiny. Mr Fitton said: "Opponents of the war will point to the documents as evidence that the Bush administration was after Iraqi oil. Supporters will say the energy task force would have been remiss if it did not take Iraq's oil into account."
Nevertheless, the documents represent a surprising development. Until now it had been assumed that the US government was stonewalling over the energy task force papers because they would show the extent to which major party benefactors, including Enron, effectively wrote national energy policy. Judicial Watch and other watchdogs are now curious what else may be revealed.
Originally posted by: DealMonkey
Yes, I, along with Judicial Watch (a conservative legal charity) oppose government secrecy. Wow, did I just agree with the conservatives?? Holy ... :Q
Judicial Watch isn't claiming that the documents are proof of any particular intent but says they should be open to public scrutiny. Mr Fitton said: "Opponents of the war will point to the documents as evidence that the Bush administration was after Iraqi oil. Supporters will say the energy task force would have been remiss if it did not take Iraq's oil into account."
Nevertheless, the documents represent a surprising development. Until now it had been assumed that the US government was stonewalling over the energy task force papers because they would show the extent to which major party benefactors, including Enron, effectively wrote national energy policy. Judicial Watch and other watchdogs are now curious what else may be revealed.
Originally posted by: charrison
Originally posted by: Zebo
Wonder why the are so adamant and fighting to keep this "energy" meeting so secret?
Text
Well Cheney also had infrastructure maps of other oil producing countries. I guess we will invade those later? Also is it wrong to know about the infrastrcture of an oil producing country if we are buying oil from them?
Originally posted by: flavio
Originally posted by: charrison
Originally posted by: Zebo
Wonder why the are so adamant and fighting to keep this "energy" meeting so secret?
Text
Well Cheney also had infrastructure maps of other oil producing countries. I guess we will invade those later? Also is it wrong to know about the infrastrcture of an oil producing country if we are buying oil from them?
So "Mr Cheney has fought the release of the documents at every stage" why?
Originally posted by: flavio
Originally posted by: charrison
Originally posted by: Zebo
Wonder why the are so adamant and fighting to keep this "energy" meeting so secret?
Text
Well Cheney also had infrastructure maps of other oil producing countries. I guess we will invade those later? Also is it wrong to know about the infrastrcture of an oil producing country if we are buying oil from them?
So "Mr Cheney has fought the release of the documents at every stage" why?
Originally posted by: sMiLeYz
After reading this, I think all my outrage is spent. What Cheney has done... is simply beyond criminal.
I'm just in complete "shock and awe" with what this administration has done. I daresay this is ten times worst than Watergate scandal, that was abuse of power. This is greed, corruption, deception, all in the name of black gold using the cover of 9/11.
If Cheney did something wrong - he will be held accountable.
Originally posted by: CADkindaGUY
Originally posted by: sMiLeYz
After reading this, I think all my outrage is spent. What Cheney has done... is simply beyond criminal.
I'm just in complete "shock and awe" with what this administration has done. I daresay this is ten times worst than Watergate scandal, that was abuse of power. This is greed, corruption, deception, all in the name of black gold using the cover of 9/11.
You don't even know what the real truth is yet and you are saying that it is ten times worse than watergate?
Please spare us the rhetoric.
If Cheney did something wrong - he will be held accountable. Up until this point it is only speculation. As with all the other speculative accusations thrown at this admin by the left, this one will most likely miss target too. (IMO )
CkG
Originally posted by: drewshin
Originally posted by: CADkindaGUY
Originally posted by: sMiLeYz
After reading this, I think all my outrage is spent. What Cheney has done... is simply beyond criminal.
I'm just in complete "shock and awe" with what this administration has done. I daresay this is ten times worst than Watergate scandal, that was abuse of power. This is greed, corruption, deception, all in the name of black gold using the cover of 9/11.
You don't even know what the real truth is yet and you are saying that it is ten times worse than watergate?
Please spare us the rhetoric.
If Cheney did something wrong - he will be held accountable. Up until this point it is only speculation. As with all the other speculative accusations thrown at this admin by the left, this one will most likely miss target too. (IMO )
CkG
you make it seem like making speculative accusations is somehow wrong. if the administration did do something wrong, do you they think they'd be parading it around washington? it's up to people to yes, make some speculative accusations and if it turns out that there is evidence for it, then continue further. if you get stonewalled, then you know that you've really hit something. what would this world be without some nut speculating about something that seems crazy but ends up turning out to be the truth.
Originally posted by: drewshin
Originally posted by: CADkindaGUY
Originally posted by: sMiLeYz
After reading this, I think all my outrage is spent. What Cheney has done... is simply beyond criminal.
I'm just in complete "shock and awe" with what this administration has done. I daresay this is ten times worst than Watergate scandal, that was abuse of power. This is greed, corruption, deception, all in the name of black gold using the cover of 9/11.
You don't even know what the real truth is yet and you are saying that it is ten times worse than watergate?
Please spare us the rhetoric.
If Cheney did something wrong - he will be held accountable. Up until this point it is only speculation. As with all the other speculative accusations thrown at this admin by the left, this one will most likely miss target too. (IMO )
CkG
you make it seem like making speculative accusations is somehow wrong. if the administration did do something wrong, do you they think they'd be parading it around washington? it's up to people to yes, make some speculative accusations and if it turns out that there is evidence for it, then continue further. if you get stonewalled, then you know that you've really hit something. what would this world be without some nut speculating about something that seems crazy but ends up turning out to be the truth.