sandorski
No Lifer
- Oct 10, 1999
- 70,215
- 5,794
- 126
Well, genius, you better get started on your time machine.
For the rest of us who prefer to live within the confines of reality...
Reality? Really?
Well, genius, you better get started on your time machine.
For the rest of us who prefer to live within the confines of reality...
there's no political will for cuts when the economy is doing well.
Is it worth considering that this whole "crisis" is being a little overly dramatized? After decades of deficit spending, we suddenly decide that deficit spending is literally going to destroy America, right away. I think it's a problem we should solve, but it kind of feels like people are getting way too worked up about it.
Considering that not doing anything at all rapidly makes us Greece without an EU to bail us out, no series of cuts can be worse. Another stimulus plan, adding more to our debt even more quickly and thereby making the situation even worse, is about the only way to make things worse. I suppose though it's arguable whether honest austerity now, with all the pain that entails, is worse than these make-believe cuts and miniscule cuts in spending growth, but only because if the economy really came roaring back, we could solve some of our problem just by growing more slowly. It would have to be real wealth-producing growth though, not merely a boom in moving money from one pocket to the other.I don't know, I'm not sure the line in the sand approach is the best way to handle it. The problem came about due to long term, cumulative deficit spending that was never checked. I'm not sure trying to reverse our spending history all at once isn't going to have just as much of a negative impact than not doing anything at all.
A dedication to many smaller steps over time, slowing and then reversing the rate of deficit growth seems reasonable to me. The problem is that there's much less incentive to do that, since I think both sides are just all about the next election.
