So far the "debate" has been rather pathetic. Party politics, as usual.
I believe the idea of a new Department is a complete waste and fails to adequately address our security. When our intelligence community failed to miss 9/11 because of too much bureacracy, how in the hell can creating more bureacracy fix the problem? To me it seems the opposite is needed: less red tape, eliminating redundancies and turning the FBI, CIA and NSA upside down to see what crud falls out.
Also, it looks like this new Dept. may cost $30+ billion/year. All to protect America. May I ask what the $300+ billion/year to fund the military is for?
I believe the idea of a new Department is a complete waste and fails to adequately address our security. When our intelligence community failed to miss 9/11 because of too much bureacracy, how in the hell can creating more bureacracy fix the problem? To me it seems the opposite is needed: less red tape, eliminating redundancies and turning the FBI, CIA and NSA upside down to see what crud falls out.
Also, it looks like this new Dept. may cost $30+ billion/year. All to protect America. May I ask what the $300+ billion/year to fund the military is for?