It is rather amusing that you not only cherry pick data to post but you also miss the overall point.
*I* missed the point? Can you not read? From the CNN link-
John Chambers, the head of sovereign ratings at S&P, told CNN's Anderson Cooper that the political brinkmanship over the debt ceiling proved to be a key issue, with "the U.S. government getting to the last day before they had cash-management problems."
Few governments separate the budget process from the debt-authorization process as the United States does, he noted.
And, though the budget deal that finally was reached will deliver at least $2.1 trillion in savings over the next decade, that will not suffice, he said. "It's going to be difficult to get beyond that -- at least in the near term -- and you do need to get beyond that to get to a point where the debt-to-GDP ratio is going to stabilize."
Asked who was to blame, Chambers said, "This is a problem that's been a long time in the making -- well over this administration, the prior administration."
Congress should shoulder some of the blame, he said. "The first thing it could have done is to have raised the debt ceiling in a timely manner so that much of this debate had been avoided to begin with, as it had done 60 or 70 times since 1960 without that much debate."
Chambers added that his agency's decision is likely to have a long-term impact. "Once you lose your AAA, it doesn't usually bounce back," he said.
He pointed to the decision by Congress about whether to extend the 2001 and 2003 tax cuts as one crucial area. "If you let them lapse for the high-income earners, that could give you another $950 billion," he said.
Republican brinkmanship & refusal to raise taxes, to gain revenue to close the gap are his cited reasons for the downgrade. Spin it any way you want, but that's straight from the source.
