CONFIRMED! 1st evar 10K+ 3DMARK03 Score! Is this a good 3dmark2003 score for my pc?

[FreshPrince]

Originally posted by: fisher

Beg to differ on this. 1.5 times your RAM set static is the norm, and anyone with that much RAM with a decent system has the HD space to do it.

when ppl had 128mb of ram maybe. i see fewer and fewer people recommending this anymore, because it's simply not needed. if you're running 1-1.5gb of ram you should NEED that big of a swapfile.

I used to customize the swap. However, with newer comps, I've been letting windows handle it. I don't see any performance issues with this. Besides...everything should be in memory with 1GB...I doubt I will ever see it swap. I would be interesting to see if it's possible to get 2GBs and use the turn off swap option 😉 wonder how that would perform...hmmm 😀

 

[flexy]

bingo! that is why those who call me moron, idiot, or cheater don't deserve a direct response from me 😛
I don't see how I can "photochop" my "bogus" results and send them to futuremark anyways...LMAO! It doesn't work that way boys and gurls..
[...]
---> The fact that I posted a compare link says my numbers are infact legit(created by 3dmark03).

i had a god laugh seeing that you seriously say/think that the fact that you post a result at the ORB is equal to the result being legit !!!!
That's the funniest think i've ever read !!!!

Just yesterday i did a 3dmark03 run and beat 32k (read again) using a (maybe little) known program which enables me to switch off rendering and/or render the whole 3dmark03 suite in wireframe - giving me 200 something fps in every game tests...and a LEGIT (AHAHAHA) result at the end !!!!
What about 32k 3dmarks03 - how 'legit' is that ?

a) it's not even a issue of 3dmark being crap. In fact, i am always defending 3dmark (especially 03) as a good evaluation software for recent gfx cards...no matter what other people say.
But...there will alwas be ways to cheat.....and the way i 'cheated'...has nothing to do with "3dmark" being crap.

Still...we do not have an answer by YOU wheter you actually REALLY did 199fps in Nature (NO tricks like i did)....but we're still missing that.
We only have your score which is already proven that 'everyone' with a lil knowledge can fake it

So...

 

[Alptraum]

Originally posted by: FreshPrince

Originally posted by: fisher

Beg to differ on this. 1.5 times your RAM set static is the norm, and anyone with that much RAM with a decent system has the HD space to do it.

when ppl had 128mb of ram maybe. i see fewer and fewer people recommending this anymore, because it's simply not needed. if you're running 1-1.5gb of ram you should NEED that big of a swapfile.

I used to customize the swap. However, with newer comps, I've been letting windows handle it. I don't see any performance issues with this. Besides...everything should be in memory with 1GB...I doubt I will ever see it swap. I would be interesting to see if it's possible to get 2GBs and use the turn off swap option 😉 wonder how that would perform...hmmm 😀

In general it would perform poorly. Some programs and OS's are written to use the swap no matter what. I know I have seen this with Win 2k servers. You could have 6gigs of free RAM and still get bad performance if you turn off swap. At least with Windows OS's you should never turn off swap.

 

[Davegod]

lol at the sad b@stards having a go at FreshPrince for a dodgy score, which he's never tried to claim is accurate.

really need to find something better than crappy pointless gaming benchmark scores to get all angry about.

 

[FreshPrince]

Originally posted by: flexy

bingo! that is why those who call me moron, idiot, or cheater don't deserve a direct response from me 😛
I don't see how I can "photochop" my "bogus" results and send them to futuremark anyways...LMAO! It doesn't work that way boys and gurls..
[...]
---> The fact that I posted a compare link says my numbers are infact legit(created by 3dmark03).

i had a god laugh seeing that you seriously say/think that the fact that you post a result at the ORB is equal to the result being legit !!!!
That's the funniest think i've ever read !!!!

Just yesterday i did a 3dmark03 run and beat 32k (read again) using a (maybe little) known program which enables me to switch off rendering and/or render the whole 3dmark03 suite in wireframe - giving me 200 something fps in every game tests...and a LEGIT (AHAHAHA) result at the end !!!!
What about 32k 3dmarks03 - how 'legit' is that ?

a) it's not even a issue of 3dmark being crap. In fact, i am always defending 3dmark (especially 03) as a good evaluation software for recent gfx cards...no matter what other people say.
But...there will alwas be ways to cheat.....and the way i 'cheated'...has nothing to do with "3dmark" being crap.

Still...we do not have an answer by YOU wheter you actually REALLY did 199fps in Nature (NO tricks like i did)....but we're still missing that.
We only have your score which is already proven that 'everyone' with a lil knowledge can fake it

So...

man, how many times does a guy have to explain himself?

like I said, having 10K+ score in 3dmark03 does not mean my graphics card is some miracle chip..it mean the software consists of bugs, which somehow allowed my all stock setting to attain 10K+ score. I don't give a flying f*ck if it's real or not. in fact, I know this score is not indicative of my system's performance. However, I have to defend myself when people call me a cheat...bc I never cheated...it's just a software bug. So everyone, get it through your thick head and just admit that 3dmark03 is buggy, which is why it allowed me to generate this score. btw, you never submitted your compare link, so even though you can fake the score, the program will never let you submit the fake score to the compare link. mine was generated by the buggy 3dmark03 program...which is why I am able to publish the compare link. I thought it would be obvious now that you can just fake a score and submit it to 3dmark03...the score has to be generated by 3dmark03 program....which is why I am able to publish the skewed score. once again, does this mean my comp performs this good? no, it's just a bug in the system....so let it go and stop trying to disprove me...as I've already stated early in this thread that I realize the program is buggy, but I just find it funny that it allows me to post it to the website, which means it's legit, within the program's parameters...but it's really skewed? get it now? let it go, and just let me live in my fantasy for a while, I'm sure they will take down my skewed score soon enough, so don't sweat it. However, I do challenge anyone that can generate these skewed numbers and not use any external hack to generate the higher scores. that is what I have, I never hacked the program, it just came out this way. NO, my gpu is not that good, but without hacking the program, I challenge someone to post a skewed score. I'm sure someone out there has the same setup getting the same results, it's just a software bug...get over it 😛

 

[Pete]

Sorry, thought you'd know about it. Just hit FRAPS.com and grab the latest version. It's a very simple way to benchmark pretty much any 3D game, though obviously using FRAPS isn't as convenient as using a built-in benchmark function, as FRAPS is more for real-time benchmarking.

I'd just like you to have FRAPS running while you bench 3DM03, and see if the average score FRAPS shows in GT4 is 200fps or something more reasonable. FRAPS has a simple built-in averaging function, which defaults to hitting Scroll Lock, IIRC. So you could hit Scroll Lock when GT4 starts, and hit it again just before it ends to see the average number FRAPS spits out.

But, yes, Google should be the default answer to any Internet question. 😉

 

[flexy]

>>>like I said, having 10K+ score in 3dmark03 does not mean my graphics card is some miracle chip..it mean the software consists of bugs, which somehow allowed my all stock setting to attain 10K+ score.

hi, well it's not that i accused you of anything..calm down..it's all good 🙂


>>>> I don't give a flying f*ck if it's real or not. in fact, I know this score is not indicative of my system's performance. However, I have to defend myself when people call me a cheat...bc I never cheated...it's just a software bug. So everyone, get it through your thick head and just admit that 3dmark03 is buggy, which is why it allowed me to generate this score.

The point was that i rather only wanted to know whether you *really* got 199fps in nature or not. Bug or not. You were jsut not clear. You were indeed saying that 3dmark03 has a bug (and others can confirm that) - you were just not clear in your post whether you really got 199fps (somehow) in that one bench or as a fact *not* but 3dmark said so 🙂


>>> btw, you never submitted your compare link, so even though you can fake the score, the program will never let you submit the fake score to the compare link. mine was generated by the buggy 3dmark03 program...which is why I am able to publish the compare link.

The cheat program has nothing to do with 3dmark since 3dmark doesnt *know* about the cheat !!! In my case ALSO 3dmark generated the score (what else ?????) If something else would have faked the score and not 3dmark then it wouldnt be worth talking about it !


>>> I thought it would be obvious now that you can just fake a score and submit it to 3dmark03...the score has to be generated by 3dmark03 program....which is why I am able to publish the skewed score. once again, does this mean my comp performs this good? no, it's just a bug in the system....so let it go and stop trying to disprove me...

you *could* 've been cheating for gettig attention etc....who knows...anyway doesn't matter....more interested in teh technical background and how it was ossible in your case with a 9600..i mean it would just be interesting to see a 9600 render nature at 200 fps or so..wouldn't it ?


>>>as I've already stated early in this thread that I realize the program is buggy, but I just find it funny that it allows me to post it to the website, which means it's legit, within the program's parameters..


nononoon...as said.again.....the ability to publish it does not make it ligit. And...btw....even the webmasters at futuremark KNOW that peple are able to suppl non legit scores - these scores get deleted. These people do NOT assume that once it goes on ORB it automatically means it's ligit.

>>>.but it's really skewed? get it now? let it go, and just let me live in my fantasy for a while, I'm sure they will take down my skewed score soon enough, so don't sweat it.

its not that i lose sleep over the fact of you hih 3dmark score now....lol...
Btw. go on this website (futuremark forum) and read how people are asked to "watch out for obviously flawed scores" which the admins then delete out of the ORB...by their own (and the forum people's guessing) "what score is legit or not"
That's ridiculous !!!

there are people saying "this and this person's score must be flawed because it is 300 pts more than what i have with the same config" <--- and then the admins take that score out of the ORB based on the suspicion that someone submitted a flawed score !!!!! What the hell is that ????????
I mean i see the problem...but for some reaso i found that bizzarre....sorry OT...anyway...