• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Confessions of an Economic Hit Man

Votingisanillusion

Senior member
Here is an article about a man (and his great book) I heard interviewed: his words helped me understand US foreign policy more clearly than ever before. What impressed me most was when he explained how most people at the World Bank and other such institutions sincerely believe they are doing their best to help poor countries; only the men at the top, like him, really know the game that is being played, because they have been extensively explained everything by their handlers. Also of great interest is how he shows (with examples) that the ultimate goal of the loans to most Third World countries is to seize the natural resources, industries, public services of these countries overloaded with loans, once they are on the verge of bankruptcy. An example he gives: Ecudador (one of his "clients") went from 50% poverty in 1970 to 70%, under- or unemployment from 15% to 70%, and public debt from $240 million to $16 billion. Meanwhile a few get rich from the benefit to their businesses, and strongly support the U.S. Specifically, for every $100 in oil taken out of Ecuador, only about $3 goes to help its citizens.
People who refuse to believe his story should read about world history, Machiavelli, Tchakhotine...an empire today is not better than an empire 2000 years ago. The propaganda has become more subtle, more and better targeted at our unconscious, that is all. But before reading books, throw away the brainwashing machine called TV...and your empire's school history textbooks.
The book:
http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/1576753018?v=glance


Confessions Of A Hit Man
Charley Reese

September 26, 2005 -- -- John Perkins' book "Confessions of an Economic Hit Man" explains American foreign policy better than any of the academic tomes you might read on the subject.

In a nutshell, the game is played this way: People like Perkins work for consulting firms, and their job is to entice a foreign head of state to go deeply in debt. They do this by greatly exaggerating the economic returns on big projects such as dams and electrification systems.

The payoff comes in two ways. The foreign country hires American contractors to build the systems, and they make big profits. Then, mired in debt, the head of state will do what the United States government tells him to do. If he proves too independent or too honest to accept bribes, then he will be removed from power, either in a coup or in an accident.

Yes, I know that sounds more like the Mafia than the great and good government of the United States, which wants only to spread peace, prosperity and democracy around the world. Read the book and decide for yourself. The publisher is Berrett-Koehler Publishers Inc.

I believe Perkins is telling the truth, because I have observed through the years that the United States hates any honest nationalist leader. Let some guy try to benefit his own people instead of catering to multinational corporations, and the U.S. government and the propaganda machine will crank up and paint him as a villain. After the American people have been sufficiently indoctrinated, the poor guy won't be around much longer.

We did that to Mohammed Mossadegh, a democratically elected nationalist who thought Iran's oil should benefit Iranians. We painted him as a communist, and the CIA engineered a coup that replaced him with the Shah. In case you're curious, that's why so many Iranians hate us. We did it to a Guatemalan patriot, Jacobo Arbenz, when he tried to implement land reform and thus ran afoul of the United Fruit Co., which orchestrated the campaign that led to his overthrow by the U.S. Omar Torrijos, a Panamanian reformer, and Jaime Roldos, president of Ecuador who locked horns with big oil companies, both died in planes that exploded.

On the other hand, the ruthless and corrupt killers who play the game our way get rewarded with more loans and more aid. I know this sounds leftist and even, God forbid, liberal, but the more you get to know our government, the less you will think it's all sweetness and light. People fear the U.S. with good reason. We talk about spreading democracy, but what we do is extend empire and make war.

If you count the Cold War, we have been at war almost continuously. There was Korea, Vietnam, the invasion of Lebanon, the invasions of Panama and Grenada, the bombings of Serbia and Libya, our little misadventure in Somalia and two wars with Iraq, and now that the Cold War is over, we have replaced it with an endless war on terrorism. Sprinkled in between all of these overt wars are numerous covert operations.

It isn't, after all, a capital crime for a foreign leader to be a socialist or to believe in land reform or to try to stop oil companies from defiling his country or cheating it out of a proper return. I've often thought old Saddam Hussein cut his own throat when he made a speech to the other Arab leaders saying they should not invest their petrodollars in the West but should instead invest them in the Arab world. Bankers in London and New York don't like to hear that kind of talk. We don't mind thugs and killers, but we despise a nationalist. The very idea of denying us the use of their dollars is, well, sacrilegious from an imperial point of view.

We were a great and much-loved country when we were a republic. Since we've become an empire, we're hardly loved at all and, in fact, are hated by many people in the world. Unless we find a way to return to our republican roots, we will go the way of all empires ? simultaneously accumulating enemies and bankrupting ourselves in an eventually futile attempt to defeat them.

At any rate, read Perkins' book. Like a real hit man, he got wealthy and then ratted out his former benefactors.

http://informationclearinghouse.info/article10398.htm

Video and mp3 of the interview: http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article8171.htm
 
:thumbsup:

(of course, it should be well known here by now that I already thought the bankers were doing this sort of thing, and that this is why China is on its path to take Taiwan and rip us a new one)
 
Originally posted by: Kalbi
Cliffs: America is evil or America is good?

You decide.

History of U.S. Interventions in Latin America:
Location Period Type of Force Comments on U.S. Role
[*]Argentina 1890 Troops Buenos Aires interests protected
[*]Chile 1891 Troops Marines clash with nationalist rebels
[*]Haiti 1891 Troops Black workers revolt on U.S.-claimed Navassa Island defeated
[*]Nicaragua 1894 Troops Month-long occupation of Bluefields
[*]Panama 1895 Naval, troops Marines land in Colombian province
[*]Nicaragua 1896 Troops Marines land in port of Corinto
[*]Cuba 1898- Naval, troops Seized from Spain, U.S. still holds Navy base at Guantanamo
[*]Puerto Rico 1898- Naval, troops Seized from Spain, occupation continues
[*]Nicaragua 1898 Troops Marines land at port of San Juan del Sur
[*]Nicaragua 1899 Troops Marines land at port of Bluefields
[*]Honduras 1903 Troops Marines intervene in revolution
[*]Dominican Republic 1903-04 Troops U.S. interests protected in Revolution
[*]Cuba 1906-09 Troops Marines land in democratic election
[*]Nicaragua 1907 Troops "Dollar Diplomacy" protectorate set up
[*]Honduras 1907 Troops Marines land during war with Nicaragua
[*]Panama 1908 Troops Marines intervene in election contest
[*]Nicaragua 1910 Troops Marines land in Bluefields and Corinto
[*]Honduras 1911 Troops U.S. interests protected in civil war
[*]Cuba 1912 Troops U.S. interests protected in Havana
[*]Panama 1912 Troops Marines land during heated election
[*]Honduras 1912 Troops Marines protect U.S. economic interests
[*]Nicaragua 1912-33 Troops, bombing 20-year occupation, fought guerrillas
[*]Mexico 1913 Naval Americans evacuated during revolution
[*]Dominican Republic 1914 Naval Fight with rebels over Santo Domingo
[*]Mexico 1914-18 Naval, troops Series of interventions against nationalists
[*]Haiti 1914-34 Troops, bombing 19-year occupation after revolts
[*]Dominican Republic 1916-24 Troops 8-year Marine occupation
[*]Cuba 1917-33 Troops Military occupation, economic protectorate
[*]Panama 1918-20 Troops "Police duty" during unrest after elections
[*]Honduras 1919 Troops Marines land during election campaign
[*]Guatemala 1920 Troops 2-week intervention against unionists
[*]Costa Rica 1921 Troops
[*]Panama 1921 Troops
[*]Honduras 1924-25 Troops Landed twice during election strife
[*]Panama 1925 Troops Marines suppress general strike
[*]El Salvador 1932 Naval Warships sent during Faribundo Marti revolt
[*]Uruguay 1947 Nuclear threat Bombers deployed as show of strength
[*]Puerto Rico 1950 Command operation Independence rebellion crushed in Ponce
[*]Guatemala 1954-? Command operation, bombing, nuclear threat CIA directs exile invasion and coup d'Etat after newly elected government nationalizes unused U.S.'s United Fruit Company lands; bombers based in Nicaragua; long-term result: 200,000 murdered
[*]Panama 1958 Troops Flag protests erupt into confrontation
[*]Cuba 1961 Command operation CIA-directed exile invasion fails
[*]Cuba 1962 Nuclear threat, naval Blockade during missile crisis; near-war with Soviet Union
[*]Panama 1964 Troops Panamanians shot for urging canal's return
[*]Dominican Republic 1965-66 Troops, bombing Marines land during election campaign
[*]Guatemala 1966-67 Command operation Green Berets intervene against rebels
[*]Chile 1973 Command operation CIA-backed coup ousts democratically elected Marxist president
[*]El Salvador 1981-92 Command operation, troops Advisors, overflights aid anti-rebel war, soldiers briefly involved in hostage clash; long-term result: 75,000 murdered and destruction of popular movement
[*]Nicaragua 1981-90 Command operation, naval CIA directs exile (Contra) invasions, plants harbor mines against revolution; result: 50,000 murdered
[*]Honduras 1982-90 Troops Maneuvers help build bases near borders
[*]Grenada 1983-84 Troops, bombing Invasion four years after revolution
[*]Bolivia 1987 Troops Army assists raids on cocaine region
[*]Panama 1989 Troops, bombing Nationalist government ousted by 27,000 soldiers, leaders arrested, 2000+ killed
[*]Haiti 1994-95 Troops, naval Blockade against military government; troops restore President Aristide to office three years after coup
[*]Venezuela 2002 Command operation Failed coup attempt to remove left-populist president Hugo Chavez
[*]Haiti 2004- Troops Removal of democratically elected President Aristide; troops occupy country

Link
 
Originally posted by: ironwing
Originally posted by: Kalbi
Cliffs: America is evil or America is good?

You decide.

History of U.S. Interventions in Latin America:
Location Period Type of Force Comments on U.S. Role
[*]Argentina 1890 Troops Buenos Aires interests protected
[*]Chile 1891 Troops Marines clash with nationalist rebels
[*]Haiti 1891 Troops Black workers revolt on U.S.-claimed Navassa Island defeated
[*]Nicaragua 1894 Troops Month-long occupation of Bluefields
[*]Panama 1895 Naval, troops Marines land in Colombian province
[*]Nicaragua 1896 Troops Marines land in port of Corinto
[*]Cuba 1898- Naval, troops Seized from Spain, U.S. still holds Navy base at Guantanamo
[*]Puerto Rico 1898- Naval, troops Seized from Spain, occupation continues
[*]Nicaragua 1898 Troops Marines land at port of San Juan del Sur
[*]Nicaragua 1899 Troops Marines land at port of Bluefields
[*]Honduras 1903 Troops Marines intervene in revolution
[*]Dominican Republic 1903-04 Troops U.S. interests protected in Revolution
[*]Cuba 1906-09 Troops Marines land in democratic election
[*]Nicaragua 1907 Troops "Dollar Diplomacy" protectorate set up
[*]Honduras 1907 Troops Marines land during war with Nicaragua
[*]Panama 1908 Troops Marines intervene in election contest
[*]Nicaragua 1910 Troops Marines land in Bluefields and Corinto
[*]Honduras 1911 Troops U.S. interests protected in civil war
[*]Cuba 1912 Troops U.S. interests protected in Havana
[*]Panama 1912 Troops Marines land during heated election
[*]Honduras 1912 Troops Marines protect U.S. economic interests
[*]Nicaragua 1912-33 Troops, bombing 20-year occupation, fought guerrillas
[*]Mexico 1913 Naval Americans evacuated during revolution
[*]Dominican Republic 1914 Naval Fight with rebels over Santo Domingo
[*]Mexico 1914-18 Naval, troops Series of interventions against nationalists
[*]Haiti 1914-34 Troops, bombing 19-year occupation after revolts
[*]Dominican Republic 1916-24 Troops 8-year Marine occupation
[*]Cuba 1917-33 Troops Military occupation, economic protectorate
[*]Panama 1918-20 Troops "Police duty" during unrest after elections
[*]Honduras 1919 Troops Marines land during election campaign
[*]Guatemala 1920 Troops 2-week intervention against unionists
[*]Costa Rica 1921 Troops
[*]Panama 1921 Troops
[*]Honduras 1924-25 Troops Landed twice during election strife
[*]Panama 1925 Troops Marines suppress general strike
[*]El Salvador 1932 Naval Warships sent during Faribundo Marti revolt
[*]Uruguay 1947 Nuclear threat Bombers deployed as show of strength
[*]Puerto Rico 1950 Command operation Independence rebellion crushed in Ponce
[*]Guatemala 1954-? Command operation, bombing, nuclear threat CIA directs exile invasion and coup d'Etat after newly elected government nationalizes unused U.S.'s United Fruit Company lands; bombers based in Nicaragua; long-term result: 200,000 murdered
[*]Panama 1958 Troops Flag protests erupt into confrontation
[*]Cuba 1961 Command operation CIA-directed exile invasion fails
[*]Cuba 1962 Nuclear threat, naval Blockade during missile crisis; near-war with Soviet Union
[*]Panama 1964 Troops Panamanians shot for urging canal's return
[*]Dominican Republic 1965-66 Troops, bombing Marines land during election campaign
[*]Guatemala 1966-67 Command operation Green Berets intervene against rebels
[*]Chile 1973 Command operation CIA-backed coup ousts democratically elected Marxist president
[*]El Salvador 1981-92 Command operation, troops Advisors, overflights aid anti-rebel war, soldiers briefly involved in hostage clash; long-term result: 75,000 murdered and destruction of popular movement
[*]Nicaragua 1981-90 Command operation, naval CIA directs exile (Contra) invasions, plants harbor mines against revolution; result: 50,000 murdered
[*]Honduras 1982-90 Troops Maneuvers help build bases near borders
[*]Grenada 1983-84 Troops, bombing Invasion four years after revolution
[*]Bolivia 1987 Troops Army assists raids on cocaine region
[*]Panama 1989 Troops, bombing Nationalist government ousted by 27,000 soldiers, leaders arrested, 2000+ killed
[*]Haiti 1994-95 Troops, naval Blockade against military government; troops restore President Aristide to office three years after coup
[*]Venezuela 2002 Command operation Failed coup attempt to remove left-populist president Hugo Chavez
[*]Haiti 2004- Troops Removal of democratically elected President Aristide; troops occupy country

Link

So America is good then.
 
To be honest about the Cuba stuff before 1961 the Americans were will accepted and allowed in Cuba.My grandfather was an American pilot during the Spanish-American War it wasn't until the Revolution that Castro went against the US even though Batista got no support from the US in the end.JFK came along and failed many Cuban-Americans when they campaigned in Miami for Bay of Pigs support.

Castro was a big fan of FDR btw heres an old letter he wrote FDR as a youth
http://history1900s.about.com/library/photos/blycastro.htm

Though I think Castro just wanted ten bucks...funny letter regardless
 
Y'know... I read that book. It was mildly interesting.

Funny though, after reading it I have to wonder two things...

1. If what he says is true... Why is Hugo Chavez still alive?
2. If what he says is true... Why are we involved in negotiations to forgive all the debt we are supposedly using to "control" these countries?

It's interesting in the book how he makes no secret about the fact that he worked for a private company. But he keeps stating that someone else above is actually pulling the strings. It's a little too "black helicopter" for me.

He wants to blame the US government for backing the actions of the private company he worked for. He pretty much uses the guilt-by-association tactics of Michael Moore to emphasize all the big name people who are supposedly involved in the company before, during and after their stint as public servants. (Lippo Group anyone?)

At the end of the book I didn't see a government conspiracy. I saw private enterprise taking advantage of unsophisticated governments who were desperate for capital to propel their economies.

 
Originally posted by: Whoozyerdaddy
Y'know... I read that book. It was mildly interesting.

Funny though, after reading it I have to wonder two things...

1. If what he says is true... Why is Hugo Chavez still alive?
2. If what he says is true... Why are we involved in negotiations to forgive all the debt we are supposedly using to "control" these countries?

It's interesting in the book how he makes no secret about the fact that he worked for a private company. But he keeps stating that someone else above is actually pulling the strings. It's a little too "black helicopter" for me.

He wants to blame the US government for backing the actions of the private company he worked for. He pretty much uses the guilt-by-association tactics of Michael Moore to emphasize all the big name people who are supposedly involved in the company before, during and after their stint as public servants. (Lippo Group anyone?)

At the end of the book I didn't see a government conspiracy. I saw private enterprise taking advantage of unsophisticated governments who were desperate for capital to propel their economies.

Did you forget the coup against Chavez? Interesting selective memory!
Negotiations about the debt are always PR. A few months after the publicity on TV that "proved" to John Smith that world leaders are good-hearted people, what gets signed never ever completely erases the debt. The goal is to control as many countries as possible through the debt.
And about your analysis of the book: do you really believe empires are built by accident? 😀 No planning: no empire!
 
Back
Top