• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Company refuses to give you a raise that you want...

Page 3 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
just do what I do when the boss refused me a raise and then in the same week stiffed me on 6 weeks worth of over time...I claimed a fair amount of the products that I was selling for him as my own(luckily I work in a PC Sales/repair store), morally it was wrong but hey I was owed thousands, it would have cost me more(upwards of AU$40,000) to take him and the company to industrial relations.

What made it really funny was that he did the same thing to my supervisor...so every sunday arvo we would back our cars upto the loading ramp and help oursleves to what ever we wanted until we got to the amount we were owed(I ended up with several free custom PC's).

The boss found out about six months later what we had done(dodgied stocktakes can only go so far) and instead of reporting us to the police and facing possible action from industrial relations, he just turned a blind eye and told us that "he was square with us now..so stop stealing the stock or he would go to the police"..I figured fair enough...I would have only spent the money he owed me on discounted PC parts at the store I worked at anyway.

I now get payed regularly and get my overtime when it is owed to me.

 
The last job I left, I was told it took three people to pick up what I was doing. Of course my boss wasn't listening when I told him the work volume was too much after several rounds of layoffs and the work got dumped on the people that were left. I got tired of staying late and doing weekend works. Yeah, they gave me a nice bonus but my time is worth more. Left the job and got another 8-5 job closer to home so I could get home before the sun set and my weekends is now all mine. Sometime they don't understand it's not just the money.
 
So my question now is, how have people successfully approached similar situations where they felt they were underpaid? It seems like it is often damned if you do and damned if you don't, and your best option is to look elsewhere to have that as a backup.

What I don't get is that it is well known that the related costs to interview/hire/train another person is VERY expensive (often 1-3x the salary of that position), yet companies often don't treat well their most valuable asset (employes..well presumably).
 
Originally posted by: GuideBot
Originally posted by: MS Dawn
Maybe it's better to do something you like and not worry about the money so much?

That's absolute gold, MS Dawn. That's how I view life. Too bad so many people can't look past the almighty dollar or the soulless corporate money machine. 🙁

I know. Those stupid power, cable, food, gas, entertainment, car,clothing, etc... companies.

Good thing the price of homes hasn't more than doubled in my area over the last few years or I would need to worry about the almighty dollar....... oops it has.

 
Originally posted by: rsd
So my question now is, how have people successfully approached similar situations where they felt they were underpaid? It seems like it is often damned if you do and damned if you don't, and your best option is to look elsewhere to have that as a backup.

I've been through this three times in my career. That is, there were three times when I wasn't getting what I deserved (based on the current market, my abilities, and my responsibilities) and I had to ante up.

The first time was when I was a data entry coordinator looking to get into Help Desk (PC support) back in 1998. The company I was at kept telling me how much they wanted me in HD, but it never happened. The honestly did need several people to increase their staff, but HR was dragging their feet, and the HD manager was such a laid back guy that he wasn't getting anything done about it either. Meanwhile, I've got headhunters calling me, job opportunities knocking, and a great desire to do something more challenging than data entry. So, I handed in my 2 weeks after I found a job and - wouldn't you know it - my current company produced an official offer letter a few days later. I stayed with said company, but it took a lot of ass kicking to get something off the ground.

Fast-forward a few years. I'm now in software development at the same company. I had been brought over from the HD department to do software development, but my salary only bumped by a small amount. It was okay with me at the time because I was getting great experience and the company was giving me something to grow into. Well, after doing this for two years, I had become quite proficient and skilled. It was time to ask for a raise to bring me up to what the market was paying. I was given a small raise and expected to be content. I was not. I found another job and handed in my resignation about a month after the raise. The company immediately presented me with a 10% raise on the spot, with another 10% to come in a year's time. Done deal. I took it. But again, look at what I had to do to "get some respect".

Fast-forward another few years. I'm now at a new company working for the same guy I worked for at the last company. He brought me over to shape things up, bring some fresh skills, etc. In a year's time, I've accomplished quite a bit. My responsibities go far beyond what was outlined in my original job description. I don't mind doing them, but I want recognition (title + pay) for performing them. I went to my boss - with whom I've now had this type of conversation with THREE times throughout my career - and asked for a small promotion and stated (factually) why I thought I deserved it. He blew it off (as he did the previous times) and didn't take it seriously until I handed in my resignation about 2 weeks later. Upon receiving my resignation, he made immediate promises to make some necessary structural changes to the deparment and to promote me.

So in my example, you have an employee and employer who know each other VERY well, and there are STILL rediculous games being played. I've demonstrated throughout my career that when I ask for a raise and state why I deserve it, I mean business. Each time I've done this, I've been willing to back it up by walking out the door. Granted, these last set of promises have yet to come true, which is why I'll likely be leaving shortly, but the fact is that there are employers who may not take you seriously unless you grab them by the earlobes and bury their faces in your bush. I have great respect for the man I work for, but his job is to get the job done as well as possible with the least amount of money as possible. That conflicts with what my goals are: to secure a job with the best compensation possible.

It all just requires the proper perspective and the willingness to play your end of the game. Sometimes you win, sometimes you lose. I'm sure there will come a time in my career when I'll go to my boss and say "I deserve this, this, and this." They'll say "no", I'll resign a few weeks later, and they could just let me walk right out the front door. Of course, that's why you need to have a job lined up: a job you're actually willing to start at when your 2 weeks runs up at your current employer.

Originally posted by: rsd
What I don't get is that it is well known that the related costs to interview/hire/train another person is VERY expensive (often 1-3x the salary of that position), yet companies often don't treat well their most valuable asset (employes..well presumably).

This is because of what I mentioned earlier. Believe me, employers understand these costs... but they're successful more often than not when they call an employee's bluff. Most people who walk into their boss's office and ask for a raise are not willing to find another job if that raise doesn't materialize. Obviously, you don't quit right there... but that negative response should mark the first day of your search for a new job. With most people it's just "oh well... worth a shot".

It SHOULD be "their loss... time to get on Monster.com". When you hand in your notice a short time later, they'll realize you meant business and that you really are as marketable as you claimed. This is something my boss has always had difficulty with. He's kind of old school in that regard. He doesn't realize that the creme of the crop is the creme of the crop for a reason. Every company needs someone from that pool of candidates, and they're hard to find. Each time I've made a decision to find a new job, it's taken no longer than a month or two. This last go around literally took me 7 days. I had 3 interviews and a fourth one lined up. I received offers from all 3 of the companies I met with. Some employers just don't understand that they can't have 100% control of 100% of the situations. They will certainly try, though.

Which brings up another point: if your current work conditions warrant asking for a raise, they probably warrant finding an alternative if it doesn't happen. If you're willing to stay without getting the raise, then you should question whether you really deserve it.
 
Originally posted by: GuideBot
Originally posted by: eleison
If I was a SMART manager and DOING MY JOB (which is to keep cost down), why would I pay someone more... when he is willing to accept less?

I have 3 people I'm directly responsible for. Whether or not they're willing to accept less has absolutely no impact on what I pay them. You're a human being, not a soulless corporate money machine. Keeping costs down is one thing -abusing your employees and taking advantage of them is another. I hate employers with that kind of outlook on their employees :| You treat your employees well and you'll be rewarded with harder, better workers. That means better quality, higher quantity product available. that means Sales can be more aggressive for increased income. That means I can, in turn, pay my employees more whether it be in a small hourly wage increase or larger, less frequent bonus. See, we both keep costs down but I get happier, harder working employees and you get a higher attrition rate which means more time and money wasted spent training the new employees and then even more time and money wasted spent giving them time to get better and more efficient at their new job, etc.

You are a bad manager 🙂 You make good points, however, there are other points I think you don't consider (numbers are made up.. but are not too far off🙂.

1) Getting paid 60K verses 100K; while 100K is good, 60K is not really "abusing your employees" especially if they are willing to accept it.

2) Workers who are willing to accept 60K usually will work just as hard . They will start to get comfortable... besides when they have coworkers depending on them... they will usually do a good job just for "them".. not to mention, they may 2nd guess themselves to how much they are really worth. I.e., "maybe I am worth only 60K"..

3) Every department has a set budget to stay within. If Bob is relatively happy with 60k, but Tim is not.. Since the department is paying Bob less, more money can be allocated to Tim esp. if Tim is willing to leave. All in all, the department has more content employees-- there are more people satisfied; if not all are "extermely" happy. Besides, if the manager paid everyone more, he would have to increase the budget... which doesn't make sense if he doesn't have to -- after all, its a business not a charity!!!

Paying everyone what they are worth, is a good idea.. however, in most cases, its just inefficient for a business... This is after much thinking... I don't know if this is a "good game" or not. However, if Bob (and several other employees )is willing to accept 60K, that could mean theres an extra 40K (or more) available for other employees who are NOT willing to be underpaid. Heck with the left over money, the manager can now afford to pay the other people even more than the average market rate... "How does 150K sound to you Tim?" 🙂 -- "robbing peter to pay paul"


-Eleison
 
Originally posted by: Linflas
There is none. I worked for a company for 11 years and while the benefits were great I fell further behind the salary curve the longer I worked there. I finally left and within 2 years had almost doubled my salary. If there is a logic to it it escapes me.

Not from your perspective, but from the company's it makes perfect sense. Leaving a job is a difficult and sometimes drawn out decision (fear of the unknown). Your company got lord knows how many months and years out of you while severely under paying you.

When you left, it probably took them no more than 6 months to over come the loss of your knowledge. Pretty good investment on their part.

I hate to say it, but it makes great business sense (in a lot of cases, probably not all) to under pay your staff.
 
Originally posted by: andylawcc
ya... the company suffers because they have to rehire someone and re-train your replacement... the implicit cost is fairly hefty. An arrogant management is the one to blame.

but, you, also suffered too. a lose-lose situtation.

It depends how long the OP worked at the company and was underpaid. It is very difficult to put a cost on the loss of productivity while someone is learning to take over for the OP. It is very easy to quantify how much money was saved while under paying someone.
 
Large companies like the one I just gave my letter of resignation to have so much bureaucracy the managers that know your worth have little control of your pay. A co-worker was told we can?t give you a raise but if you quit and come back in a few months we will hire you for more. It?s killing this company because everyone with talent is leaving. In this field a new hire is generally worthless for the first 2-3 years.
 
Originally posted by: HBalzer
Large companies like the one I just gave my letter of resignation to have so much bureaucracy the managers that know your worth have little control of your pay. A co-worker was told we can?t give you a raise but if you quit and come back in a few months we will hire you for more. It?s killing this company because everyone with talent is leaving. In this field a new hire is generally worthless for the first 2-3 years.

This is true, too. At many companies, managers are pretty much as powerless and impotent as you are. They cry themselves to sleep at night trying to convince themselves otherwise, but it's very true. Their management over you is pretty restricted to simply making sure you stay on task and reviewing your performance. Your compensation package is not only completely out of their hands, they may not even know what it is.
 
funny, i'm almost in the exact position, except I haven't literally said 'screw it' and taken off. Though this company is so tight, I doubt they'll start the next fool at the raise level I requested....

ah the drama here continues.....

danny~!
 
Where I work (the federal government), asking for a raise would be a direct blow to the egos of the middle management, and would therefore not be tolerated. They would rather lose you and hire/train someone else rather than lose that power struggle.

From management's point of view, they have budgeted for your salary. If an employee leaves they just hire another one at a similar salary, and the budget does not change. Intangibles such as productivity will certainly suffer, but these are not usually reflected in the budget. Therefore, they don't care.
 
Originally posted by: KoolAidKid
From management's point of view, they have budgeted for your salary. If an employee leaves they just hire another one at a similar salary, and the budget does not change.

Not always true. It can be a very severe blow to a company to lose an individual. If you're making X dollars and have key skills necessary to the daily operation and decide to quit, the company could very well be faced with a situation where they'll need to recruit and hire a newbie at X * Y% who won't be able to make any kind of impact for a year or so.

Most employes don't realize that their bosses KNOW this. Playing these cards properly can be tricky though.
 
Originally posted by: her209
You say "screw it" and leave. Company hires a replacement for the amount that you wanted to be raised to.

Seriously, where's the logic?

One of the things I remember most from an International Business class in college is the follow statement:

"You are always worth more to another corporation."

I never understood/believed it until I actually got into the corporate world but I see it all the time now.

 
Originally posted by: MixMasterTang
You gambled and you lost. A lot of business owners don't like to be pushed around and make a lot of decisions that don't really make sense other than them feeling like that remain in charge.

More like management gambled and lost. Or they felt her209 was a shvtty employee.
 
A lot of it is beaurocratic red tape too. In larger companies, there is often a strict increase process all the departments have to adhere to. Once someone is on the payroll, they only have so much ability to give a larger than normal increase each year. So if you were initially hired at the low-end of the salary scale for your job, you are stuck at the low end for quite a long time - it might take several years of maximium % increases to even get past the midpoint of the range.
Meanwhile, someone new gets hired and immediately gets placed at the midpoint or higher, making more than you even though you are the superior employee. Yeah, its unfair, but they need to streamline the increase process to make it manageable over such a large number of employees.
So a lot of times, the only way to get the money you should be making is to quit and find another company, which will now recognize your experience and place you higher in the pay scale. Or else threaten to quit, then your case will get elevated to some higher ranking person in your company who actually does have the authority to grant you a raise. Your direct manager probably has no ability to do it on his own.
 
Originally posted by: KoolAidKid
Where I work (the federal government), asking for a raise would be a direct blow to the egos of the middle management, and would therefore not be tolerated. They would rather lose you and hire/train someone else rather than lose that power struggle.

From management's point of view, they have budgeted for your salary. If an employee leaves they just hire another one at a similar salary, and the budget does not change. Intangibles such as productivity will certainly suffer, but these are not usually reflected in the budget. Therefore, they don't care.
How does management account for the costs to interview, hire, and train a new employee?

Also, some companies don't even give raises that will keep up with the inflation rate which is REALLY messed up.
 
Back
Top