• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Company-centricnesss

I've been noticing an increasing amount of MS-centricness to the point that it reminds me of the IBM-centricness that brought about the saying "Noone ever got fired for buying IBM". It seems like if there is an MS product vs. a long standing, known good one, the MS one is the safe way out regardless of the competitors track record, performance, or even MS's product's performance.

An example of this is in the company I work for we use virtually every MS program that isn't a game, even if it's not really needed. But people (including MIS) are afraid to see what else is out there. When the question comes up "What software would be best for ___" the reply is almost always "What does MS have that should work?". The only place I see this derrived is in high end software where personal preference on the user's part takes over (ie: ProE, AutoCAD, OrCAD...)

Once IBM was basically out of the standards picture the PC industry seemed to flourish. But now that MS is the near-undisputed king, the software seems to have lulled down to "new UI, same old crap". Granted the hardware industry has been storming the last few years in the wake of the rekindled AMD vs. Intel war (notice the sudden climb from PC100 SDRAM to DDR-333 and dual channel RDRAM)

Is this an impending doom and gloom scenario or am I overracting?
 
What products are you talking about other than Windows and Office? I don't think Linux is ready for the corporate desktop (idiots wouldn't even try to understand how to use it) and Office is pretty much standard. SQL Server is good for small to medium sized companies that don't need Oracle. Exchange Server I don't know much about.

It's true what you are saying though. The people that make decisions for a company are always very conservative. You won't get fired for choosing MS, even if it was the wrong choice. But you could get fired for choosing a lesser known software, even if its the right choice.
 
Windows NT/2k/XP
Office
Visio
Visual Studio
Exchange
Outlook
SQL


The only non-CAD software on the desktop PCs is clients for a database (oracle based iirc) and Adobe for PDF stuff. Non-database servers are pretty much pure-MS.
 
Back
Top