- Nov 20, 2009
- 8,410
- 1,617
- 136
Over the last two years I have removed myself from my employers medical and dental benefits. Part of this was in preparation for what the wife and I thought would be the eventual surplus, leaving me unemployed. Besides the fact that AT&T's medical benefit offerings suck like the vacuum of space (zero benefit until you pay 100% of your deductible), the wife and I hung onto things like the group life insurance policy, along with the AD&D supplement. Now these insurances are in addition to the paltry $50K base policy the company gives you at no cost.
Last year the Group Life Insurance policy went up from ~$140 to $206. This year is went to $340! These are monthly deductions. I find it hard to believe these are honest increases because my employer would never release the information to its employees, let alone the public at large. And a company with 250K employees has zero leverage in negotiating a better group life insurance policy? The interesting thing is that over the past decade my employer has been surplussing more older folks than younger, so the premiums leveled across the board should be lower, but they are not. All this leads me to believe that my employer isn't telling the truth, has no requirement, legally, to do so, and is actually milking its employees for their corporate gain.
What I do not understand is that when my employer decided to no longer contribute to the legacy pension plans why didn't they just get rid of the [legacy] group life insurance policy, too? BECAUSE they are miking their employees? I've got to ask, for anyone else working for a large company what is the group life offering and costs you face? Now I know on the open market it would be much worse, but this just seems overly suspicious to me.
Last year the Group Life Insurance policy went up from ~$140 to $206. This year is went to $340! These are monthly deductions. I find it hard to believe these are honest increases because my employer would never release the information to its employees, let alone the public at large. And a company with 250K employees has zero leverage in negotiating a better group life insurance policy? The interesting thing is that over the past decade my employer has been surplussing more older folks than younger, so the premiums leveled across the board should be lower, but they are not. All this leads me to believe that my employer isn't telling the truth, has no requirement, legally, to do so, and is actually milking its employees for their corporate gain.
What I do not understand is that when my employer decided to no longer contribute to the legacy pension plans why didn't they just get rid of the [legacy] group life insurance policy, too? BECAUSE they are miking their employees? I've got to ask, for anyone else working for a large company what is the group life offering and costs you face? Now I know on the open market it would be much worse, but this just seems overly suspicious to me.


