OK, here's the short version of a pretty entertaining story. I have an OLD computer I have running as a linux server, it's a Pentium II. The CPU fan/heatsink went bad and I wanted to get it up and running ASAP, so I ran to the local Comp-USA to try and grab the replacement part. Well, as expected they didn't carry it and I had to order one online, but here is the good part......
I started talking to the employee that checked on the part for me and the subject of building a computer came up. I told him that I was on the fence and was trying to decide whether to build an Athlon64 now or wait until later in the year for the changes to PCI Express, etc.
Here was his first gem:
He told me not to get an Athlon 64 because you will not even be able to use a 3D video card with it. He told me that 3D video cards were not compatible with motherboards that used Athlon64 processors.
Wow!!!! News to me! And this guy is getting paid to offer hardware advice to customers???
His second piece of advice was that I should get an Intel based board with a P4 Extreme Edition chip. I don't have a problem with that in itself I guess, but he told me in the next sentence that he recommends to every customer that asks him to go with it. He states that it offers the best price/performance ratio, and that you get the most bang for your buck with an Extreme Edition chip.
How many people have taken that advice and wasted all that money for very little gain? (at least in my opinion)
Then the subject of hard drives came up, and I asked him if they carried the Raptor. He told me they were all out but that he wouldn't suggest it anyway. He said you got no performance gain, and that I would be better off going with a normal 7200 RPM drive. I can agree that maybe going with a more reasonable hard drive would definitely save money, but to say that the raptor isn't any faster is just plain ignorant.
Do these employees have to go through any sort of training?? I'll admit that I'm not the hardware guru that a lot of you are, but I'm not being paid to advise people on which parts to buy either. Am I the only one that finds this crazy?
*edit* my grammar is teh suq
I started talking to the employee that checked on the part for me and the subject of building a computer came up. I told him that I was on the fence and was trying to decide whether to build an Athlon64 now or wait until later in the year for the changes to PCI Express, etc.
Here was his first gem:
He told me not to get an Athlon 64 because you will not even be able to use a 3D video card with it. He told me that 3D video cards were not compatible with motherboards that used Athlon64 processors.
Wow!!!! News to me! And this guy is getting paid to offer hardware advice to customers???
His second piece of advice was that I should get an Intel based board with a P4 Extreme Edition chip. I don't have a problem with that in itself I guess, but he told me in the next sentence that he recommends to every customer that asks him to go with it. He states that it offers the best price/performance ratio, and that you get the most bang for your buck with an Extreme Edition chip.
How many people have taken that advice and wasted all that money for very little gain? (at least in my opinion)
Then the subject of hard drives came up, and I asked him if they carried the Raptor. He told me they were all out but that he wouldn't suggest it anyway. He said you got no performance gain, and that I would be better off going with a normal 7200 RPM drive. I can agree that maybe going with a more reasonable hard drive would definitely save money, but to say that the raptor isn't any faster is just plain ignorant.
Do these employees have to go through any sort of training?? I'll admit that I'm not the hardware guru that a lot of you are, but I'm not being paid to advise people on which parts to buy either. Am I the only one that finds this crazy?
*edit* my grammar is teh suq