- Aug 25, 2001
- 56,570
- 10,202
- 126
When you close apps, shouldn't your commit charge go back down?
I'm a little concerned. This is my G3258 rig, it's been running for 7:23:38:xx.
Task Manager shows my commit charge to be 13/17.
I went to the Processes tab, added "Commit size" to the columns, clicked it so that the highest was listed at the top, and the highest (before I opened the web browser to post this) was like 100MB. Nothing.
Do I have a rootkit? Kernel pageable memory leak in the ATI drivers? (Running 14.9 WHQL, I believe.)
OS is Win7 HP 64-bit SP1 + updates.
I am using 4.11GB of physical RAM, out of 8GB installed, with zero programs showing in the "Applications" tab in Task Manager. Biggest RAM user is SVCHOST.EXE (LOCAL_SYSTEM) with 40MB. Biggest "Commit Size" is 106MB (CCC.EXE).
Task Manager "Performance" tab RAM stats:
Physical Memory (MB)
Total 8077
Cached 5990
Available 3677
Free 343
Kernel Memory (MB)
Paged 334
Nonpaged 216
System
Handles 417340
Threads 685
Processes 51
Up Time 7:23:50:52
Commit (GB) 13 / 17
I'm a little concerned. This is my G3258 rig, it's been running for 7:23:38:xx.
Task Manager shows my commit charge to be 13/17.
I went to the Processes tab, added "Commit size" to the columns, clicked it so that the highest was listed at the top, and the highest (before I opened the web browser to post this) was like 100MB. Nothing.
Do I have a rootkit? Kernel pageable memory leak in the ATI drivers? (Running 14.9 WHQL, I believe.)
OS is Win7 HP 64-bit SP1 + updates.
I am using 4.11GB of physical RAM, out of 8GB installed, with zero programs showing in the "Applications" tab in Task Manager. Biggest RAM user is SVCHOST.EXE (LOCAL_SYSTEM) with 40MB. Biggest "Commit Size" is 106MB (CCC.EXE).
Task Manager "Performance" tab RAM stats:
Physical Memory (MB)
Total 8077
Cached 5990
Available 3677
Free 343
Kernel Memory (MB)
Paged 334
Nonpaged 216
System
Handles 417340
Threads 685
Processes 51
Up Time 7:23:50:52
Commit (GB) 13 / 17
Last edited: