Cold Mountain: A Review

NuclearNed

Raconteur
May 18, 2001
7,884
382
126
This is a spoiler filled review. If you haven?t seen this film, please feel free to go back to all the other threads about cars, computers, and masturbation. Thank you and have a GREAT day!

I?m going to cut to the chase and let you know immediately that I recommend this movie, which I saw on DVD this weekend. You are probably wondering why I disclosed this information so early on in the review. Well, it is this simple: I was very entertained by this movie, but I have a lot of gripes about it, some of them major. I didn?t want anyone to read all the gripes first, then find out (to their surprise) that I actually liked the film. So let me definitively state for the record, this move is well worth a rental. Go check it out.

I?m going to keep the positives all in one short paragraph. The story is cool. Nicole Kidman gets nekkid ? even more so than I would have ever imagined. There is a whole bag full of great acting and cinematography; this is a beautifully filmed movie. Nicole Kidman gets nekkid (wait?did I say that already?). The setting is during the American Civil War, a time period with which I am particularly interested. And Jude Law is dreamy. If I had any homosexual tendencies at all (which I assure you I don?t), I would have posters of a bare-breasted Mr. Law pinned up all over my hair salon. As it is, Nicole Kidman gets surprisingly nekkid, and I?m a happy uber-straight guy.

My first major gripe is that this movie is so freaking predictable. For example, there is one bad guy who visually stands out from among all the bad guys by his icy blue eyes and his peroxide-enhanced locks. Didn?t even Civil War-era men make fun of guys who looked like this? The moment I saw this guy I knew in my gut that he was going to have The Showdown at the end of the movie with Jude Law. And the other hugely predictable part was that Jude Law had to die at the end of the movie. I suspected this all along, but the moment near the end when Jude and Nicole are reunited and make the sweet sweet passionate love, I turned to my wife and said ?she?s pregnant, he?s dead.? And so it came to pass.

So Jude Law?s character spends most of the movie undergoing this monumental, epic journey to be reunited with Nicole Kidman?s character for one night of sweaty, cheap sex, thereby knocking her up before dying a pointless death. To me, this kind of invalidated all the struggles he endured during his travels. It was a disappointing ending.

I imagine the more butch ladies love this film. It more or less is a feminist fantasy. It reinforces the idea that no matter how bitchy you are, as long as you look good and do a man a small favor, he will fall madly in love with you and owe you for life. For example, Nicole?s character treats Jude?s character like crap every time they meet early on, but she looks ravishing and gives him a cup of cider. Jude spends the rest of the film pining over a woman who spends the rest of the film proving that she doesn?t need him nearly as much as she at first thought. In fact, the only thing for which she has a need for Jude (and the only thing her doe-eyed female companions cannot give her) is a baby. As soon as she is pregnant, BAM, Jude is breathing out a new hole and out of the picture, again. Has it occurred to anyone else that the only time Nicole?s character really seems happy is in the final shot of the film, when she is surrounded by her female friends, her daughter, and the ?love of a lifetime? is cold in his grave? Bah.

Anyway, in spite of all the bitching, this movie kept my attention.
 

maziwanka

Lifer
Jul 4, 2000
10,415
1
0
My first major gripe is that this movie is so freaking predictable. For example, there is one bad guy who visually stands out from among all the bad guys by his icy blue eyes and his peroxide-enhanced locks. Didn?t even Civil War-era men make fun of guys who looked like this? The moment I saw this guy I knew in my gut that he was going to have The Showdown at the end of the movie with Jude Law. And the other hugely predictable part was that Jude Law had to die at the end of the movie. I suspected this all along, but the moment near the end when Jude and Nicole are reunited and make the sweet sweet passionate love, I turned to my wife and said ?she?s pregnant, he?s dead.? And so it came to pass.

So Jude Law?s character spends most of the movie undergoing this monumental, epic journey to be reunited with Nicole Kidman?s character for one night of sweaty, cheap sex, thereby knocking her up before dying a pointless death. To me, this kind of invalidated all the struggles he endured during his travels. It was a disappointing ending.

this was enough to ruin the movie for me - i.e. not recommend it.
 

PingSpike

Lifer
Feb 25, 2004
21,765
614
126
I didn't see that feminist fantasy myself, and I still don't...but Jude Law's death also bothered me. And I couldn't understand his intense love for Nicole Kidmen, since they'd only had one heated kiss and a few clumsy encounters. She didn't even seem to like him that much. When he died, which I also saw coming...I was a bit depressed. But sometimes the hero must fall I guess.
 

Fingolfin269

Lifer
Feb 28, 2003
17,948
34
91
Do you know why you knew what was going to happen in the movie? Well, obviously one might assume it's because the movie came across as extremely predictable. However, we have all read this story in another form, so subconsiously you may have remembered the other form of the story without even realizing it. The same thing happened to me with 'O Brother...'

Great movie though. I actually watched it a second time but that's probably because Nicole Kidman got nekkid. Zelwegger's role in this film was awesome but I did find myself not wanting her to get nekkid as that character. :p
 

NuclearNed

Raconteur
May 18, 2001
7,884
382
126
Originally posted by: PingSpike
I didn't see that feminist fantasy myself, and I still don't...but Jude Law's death also bothered me. And I couldn't understand his intense love for Nicole Kidmen, since they'd only had one heated kiss and a few clumsy encounters. She didn't even seem to like him that much. When he died, which I also saw coming...I was a bit depressed. But sometimes the hero must fall I guess.

I think you are seeing what I was talking about in regards to the "feminist fantasy", but are stating it differently.

Why exactly DID Jude give a crap about Nicole, just based on their few and very brief encounters? Why did virtually all the "good" men in the movie get killed, except for one kindly old chowderhead (Renee Z.'s father) who provided no threat, sexual or otherwise, to the women? Why did the movie go to such pains to show that these women had no need for men in their lives, and that they could survive just fine without them present? Why did the movie show Renee Z.'s character act jealously when she found out that Jude was back? To me it seemed like it was all to prove that women don't need men (other than to create other little versions of women). Thus, a "feminist fantasy".
 

torpid

Lifer
Sep 14, 2003
11,631
11
76
Yes, well, the problem with that analysis is that she spent the entire movie longing for his return, sending him letters, and looking in wells. And she most likely would have been killed without him. And natalie portman's character clearly demonstrated the complete opposite.

The movie may be worth seeing for all the scenes unrelated to the "love" story, though.
 

Amused

Elite Member
Apr 14, 2001
57,481
20,004
146
What most people do not seem to realize is that the story is a version of Homer's "The Odyssey" set during the Civil War.

This explains many "whys" about the movie.