• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Cold air vs hot air

zoiks

Lifer
From what I've heard colder air intakes increase overall engine power and efficiency. Does this mean that ultimately a car in a colder region may produce more hp than the same car in a hotter region?
 
Yes.

Altitude also reduces a cars power output.

Humidity also has an effect.

So is basically the 0-60 times posted for a given car the best case scenario in a cold climate area?
I guess they shouldn't be conducting any speed tests in the mideast then.
 
There are other variable which will affect the 0-60 times, I don't think there are standards set for recording them.

If your car produces a lot of power, recording timings in a cold environment may make the tyres struggle.
 
i would say that a denser air charge makes more power.
Cooler temps, low humidity and dew points.
Like was said before however, cold tires are not the best for traction.
 
i would say that a denser air charge makes more power.
Cooler temps, low humidity and dew points.
Like was said before however, cold tires are not the best for traction.

Yeah but with snow tires the car in a cold climate would probably win.

I find that my car hates humid days.
 
You don't want too cold as the air becomes denser, oil is thicker at start etc...usually somewhere in the 65-75F would probably be ideal in terms of testing for 0-60 or whatnot.
 
You don't want too cold as the air becomes denser, oil is thicker at start etc...usually somewhere in the 65-75F would probably be ideal in terms of testing for 0-60 or whatnot.
Once the engine is warmed up I'd think the air could be as cold as you can get and still not be too cold.
 
Once the engine is warmed up I'd think the air could be as cold as you can get and still not be too cold.

As someone who has experience driving in -35C weather, when it's that cold out, the engine *never* reaches its optimal temperature. It seems to lose significant horsepower and makes a funny whirring sound. The motor certainly does not sound happy to be running so cold.

I'd say the coldest you can go before this starts to happen is -15C or so.
 
Once the engine is warmed up I'd think the air could be as cold as you can get and still not be too cold.

Maybe. But I know that fuel efficiency goes up as weather warms, so I'm assuming and maybe I'm wrong that an engine runs better when it's warmer. But I'm no expert.
 
Depends on a ton of factors. I believe generally if you had all things equal, colder air tends to offer more power but warmer tends to offer a bit better fuel efficiency. With modern ECUs though, I don't know that you'd see much of a difference just because they're going to try to keep the engine in optimal ranges and so it will try to compensate for temp differences.
 
Depends on a ton of factors. I believe generally if you had all things equal, colder air tends to offer more power but warmer tends to offer a bit better fuel efficiency. With modern ECUs though, I don't know that you'd see much of a difference just because they're going to try to keep the engine in optimal ranges and so it will try to compensate for temp differences.
Can't compensate for oxygen content. It's like getting a free displacement boost.
 
Hot air rises thus making your car lighter and if there's one thing Colin Chapman has taught us...it's that lighter is better.
 
Hot air rises thus making your car lighter and if there's one thing Colin Chapman has taught us...it's that lighter is better.

It's for this reason I drive with the windows up and heat on year round. I maximize my mpg and also sweat off a pound or two each time I drive, which further enhances my mpg. win/win!!!!1
 
Less dense air also offers less resistance and drag. I was offended to get nearly 30 mpg in my 'stang (2.73 gears, stock, etc) city/highway mix until I figured out the problem was the 5800-8300 ft of altitude I was driving it at. Air+fuel in = power out, after all.

At sea level it delivered a much more rational low 20s mpg-wise.
 
Back
Top