Originally posted by: lopri
Agree with others.
Off-topic: Does anyone find COD4's graphics too console-like? I could see where the graphically heavy load took place, but they're way too flashy and overly exposed. The devs might have looked after the 'Wow' factor, but it totally killed realism for me.
I felt this way at first when comparing to crysis PC only without port. But after playing thought both games completely, i really enjoyed cod4 much more than crysis. It's like 2nd best looking graphics compared to crysis. Crysis just has awesome things like godrays, water, battledust, etc.
Cod4 can really rock graphically if you set it up right. Use your nvidia control panel to set high quality.
Try 4xaa and max AF via the game options menu ingame in cod4. Manually set your texutres to Ultra, and all graphics menu options to top,normal, insane etc. Check brightness, aspect and other things. Overall this game is MUCH more impressive than crysis. Crysis wins IMO with a few particular exceptions in graphics.... Like forrested areas, water/reflections. particle/smoke effects, DoF, Motionblur, parralax & bump mapping, and a few other things.
Either way cod4 is so optimized, it slaughters crysis performance wise and looks almost as good. After playing both and beating them a few times, I'll never go back and play crysis, yet I enjoy many levels in cod4. 10 years from now when crysis runs at 100fps on Ultra extreme quality with 16AA and 16XQAF, I'll probably go back and play some crysis.
COD4! Ftw.
Edit: on topic - 3870X2, 8800Ultra, OC'ed 8800GTS 512, or - future 9800gtx/9800gx2