COD:MW2 was then COD:BLOPS now!

Status
Not open for further replies.

HAL9000

Lifer
Oct 17, 2010
22,021
3
76
Hey Guy's

Just a small suggestion,

Let's call Call of Duty: Black Ops.... COD :BLOPS!



We already have plenty of threads about this game.

Super Moderator BFG10K.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

JujuFish

Lifer
Feb 3, 2005
11,398
1,029
136
BLOPS? I suppose you're pronouncing that as a word, too. Blops. I can't tell you how stupid that sounds. Have to agree with Raduque, no better than BO.
 

MentalIlness

Platinum Member
Nov 22, 2009
2,383
11
76
I'd be willing to bet, that over 95% of Call Of Duty Black Ops players love the game "more" than Modern Warfare 2.

I'd like to know what you all expect in a game to be honest. You all must think it is easy to make these games with little effort. There is not "one" game ever created that was "perfect" for the PC.

In my opinion, Treyarch is better than Activision.

If you don't like the game. Dont buy it. Or....Go to college, get degree's, and then make your own game the way you see fit. And I for one, am glad that these game companies don't cater to the 5% of whiney people out there.

I love the game. I love World At War. Good job Treyarch.
 

NoSoup4You

Golden Member
Feb 12, 2007
1,253
6
81
Treyarch is the redheaded stepchild in Activisions Call of Duty lineup. I know that Infinity Ward is no longer loved by PC enthusiasts (they sold out to the consoles, kinda...) but I have yet to play an Infinity Ward game that wasn't just balls to the wall awesome in both graphics and gameplay (MW2's single player storyline didn't make sense, but it still had great levels taken individually). Can't say the same for Treyarch, didn't bother with COD3 but World at War was meh at best. MW2's graphics are also light years ahead of the washed out grey mess of low res textures that is BLOPS.

With all of that said, Treyarch has surprised me with BLOPS in the gameplay department. They clearly were listening to the complaints leveled at MW2 (OP perks/killstreaks, lack of dedicated servers). My main issue with MW2 had nothing to do with dedicated servers but instead gameplay - there were too many ridiculous class setups like Noob-tube/One Man Army/Danger Close for which there was no counter. On a map like Terminal, just quit the game already because it's going to be a bore-fest and that wasn't the only idiotic perk, there's also Commando...etc.

BLOPS has much weaker noob-tubes and a Flak Jacket perk which ends all discussion of OP explosives. Love that.

So anyway, the gameplay in BLOPS is great, it's just the hideous graphics which look like they're still using the MW1 engine. MW1's engine looked great three years ago, not so much now. :)
 
Last edited:

HAL9000

Lifer
Oct 17, 2010
22,021
3
76
I'd be willing to bet, that over 95% of Call Of Duty Black Ops players love the game "more" than Modern Warfare 2.

I'd like to know what you all expect in a game to be honest. You all must think it is easy to make these games with little effort. There is not "one" game ever created that was "perfect" for the PC.

In my opinion, Treyarch is better than Activision.

If you don't like the game. Dont buy it. Or....Go to college, get degree's, and then make your own game the way you see fit. And I for one, am glad that these game companies don't cater to the 5% of whiney people out there.

I love the game. I love World At War. Good job Treyarch.

Wow! really? 95%?! I'm in the 5% then, not a big fan of Blops, I have it for 360 and PC, not impressed.
 

HAL9000

Lifer
Oct 17, 2010
22,021
3
76

I wasn't referring to that, just thought Blops sounded good.

Treyarch is the redheaded stepchild in Activisions Call of Duty lineup. I know that Infinity Ward is no longer loved by PC enthusiasts (they sold out to the consoles, kinda...) but I have yet to play an Infinity Ward game that wasn't just balls to the wall awesome in both graphics and gameplay (MW2's single player storyline didn't make sense, but it still had great levels taken individually). Can't say the same for Treyarch, didn't bother with COD3 but World at War was meh at best. MW2's graphics are also light years ahead of the washed out grey mess of low res textures that is BLOPS.

With all of that said, Treyarch has surprised me with BLOPS in the gameplay department. They clearly were listening to the complaints leveled at MW2 (OP perks/killstreaks, lack of dedicated servers). My main issue with MW2 had nothing to do with dedicated servers but instead gameplay - there were too many ridiculous class setups like Noob-tube/One Man Army/Danger Close for which there was no counter. On a map like Terminal, just quit the game already because it's going to be a bore-fest and that wasn't the only idiotic perk, there's also Commando...etc.

BLOPS has much weaker noob-tubes and a Flak Jacket perk which ends all discussion of OP explosives. Love that.

So anyway, the gameplay in BLOPS is great, it's just the hideous graphics which look like they're still using the MW1 engine. MW1's engine looked great three years ago, not so much now. :)

Yes! thank you, graphics suck, and the gameplay is good, but you might as well play MW2 which had the graphics and the gameplay. Hence: Blops, I'm also loving Flops, but it dosent make as much sense.


BLOPS? I suppose you're pronouncing that as a word, too. Blops. I can't tell you how stupid that sounds. Have to agree with Raduque, no better than BO.

It was meant to sound stupid, was that not apparent.... Also BO = Bodily Odour... http://www.google.co.uk/search?hl=e...&rls=en&q=define%3A+B.O&btnG=Search&meta=
 
Last edited:

BFG10K

Lifer
Aug 14, 2000
22,709
3,002
126
We already have plenty of threads about this game.

Super Moderator BFG10K.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.