Nebor
Lifer
- Jun 24, 2003
- 29,582
- 12
- 76
Originally posted by: mugs
Originally posted by: Nebor
No one got my funny.![]()
Way too subtle.![]()
You have alzheimers LOLZ!
Better?
Originally posted by: mugs
Originally posted by: Nebor
No one got my funny.![]()
Way too subtle.![]()
Originally posted by: sdifox
Food products have to be safe to consume. Benzine is not safe to consume. Lawsuit legit.
Originally posted by: FoBoT
i drink Vault Zero
but then i like benzene
Originally posted by: jlbenedict
Originally posted by: Citrix
Originally posted by: jlbenedict
What a crock of $hit... Coca-Cola doesn't force you to drink their products. Consumers know there is a fvcking risk with any product that is consumed, besides water. This lawsuit happy society is sickening..
Soft drink companies reach benzene deal
"Coca-Cola was sued Friday in an attempt by parents to force soft drink makers to eliminate ingredients in their products that can form cancer-causing benzene.
The complaint against the soft drink giant came as two other companies settled a lawsuit over benzene, which is linked to leukemia.
Atlanta-based In Zone Brands Inc., maker of BellyWashers, and Preston, Wash.-based TalkingRain Beverage Co. agreed to change ingredients and offer refunds. District of Columbia Superior Court judge Mary Terrell dismissed that case Friday morning.
Similar suits are pending in Kansas, Massachusetts, Florida, California and New Jersey. Plaintiffs added Coke's Vault Zero energy drink to the Kansas lawsuit, which also targets Pepsi's Diet Wild Cherry and Kraft's Crystal Light Sunrise Classic Orange.
Boston lawyer Andrew Rainer, who represents the parents, said the settlement should prod bigger companies to change their ingredients.
"I think if they understand that consumers, and perhaps courts, expect them to eliminate this problem, they will," Rainer said."
you = dumbass.
there are times when suing a company is a good thing.
Does Coca-Cola FORCE you to drink their products? You know good and damn well than any product consumed besides natural water could possibly be a risk to your health.
Consumers playing ignorant seems to be the norm today.. Play ignorant; hire a lawyer and sue.. thats all this amounts to..
Originally posted by: foghorn67
Originally posted by: mugs
Originally posted by: foghorn67
Then there should be a label on every friggin man made thing sold, given out, displayed for the general public, talked about, and read about. Made up stuff from the future should be labeled too.
I hope she loses the suit.
Um.... yeah, ok. People know that many things are harmful for them. People know that if you eat fatty foods, you're going to get fat. People know that McDonalds is not particularly healthy for them. But people don't know when they look at the ingredients on their soft drink that the potassium benzoate in there can cause cancer. And in that case, I think people deserve to be informed. I hope these people lose their lawsuit too, because they want Coca-Cola to have to change their ingredients. I think a warning should be sufficient. I think leaving the public in the dark about a largely unknown dangerous substance in their drink is not sufficient.
my point is...odds are the consumption of cocacola will lead to other health problems. Cancer should the least of your concerns when drinking these products. That fat, carbs and sugars would cause way more health problems. If you don't know the risks. Lay off junk food. I enjoy junk food, knowing we don't know all the stuff it can do to you.
Originally posted by: mugs
Originally posted by: JS80
salt causes high blood pressure. should Morton Salt be sued too?
Originally posted by: JS80
specific genes cause cancer. should your parents get sued too?
Are you trying to look like an idiot?
Originally posted by: Phokus
Originally posted by: jlbenedict
Originally posted by: Citrix
Originally posted by: jlbenedict
What a crock of $hit... Coca-Cola doesn't force you to drink their products. Consumers know there is a fvcking risk with any product that is consumed, besides water. This lawsuit happy society is sickening..
Soft drink companies reach benzene deal
"Coca-Cola was sued Friday in an attempt by parents to force soft drink makers to eliminate ingredients in their products that can form cancer-causing benzene.
The complaint against the soft drink giant came as two other companies settled a lawsuit over benzene, which is linked to leukemia.
Atlanta-based In Zone Brands Inc., maker of BellyWashers, and Preston, Wash.-based TalkingRain Beverage Co. agreed to change ingredients and offer refunds. District of Columbia Superior Court judge Mary Terrell dismissed that case Friday morning.
Similar suits are pending in Kansas, Massachusetts, Florida, California and New Jersey. Plaintiffs added Coke's Vault Zero energy drink to the Kansas lawsuit, which also targets Pepsi's Diet Wild Cherry and Kraft's Crystal Light Sunrise Classic Orange.
Boston lawyer Andrew Rainer, who represents the parents, said the settlement should prod bigger companies to change their ingredients.
"I think if they understand that consumers, and perhaps courts, expect them to eliminate this problem, they will," Rainer said."
you = dumbass.
there are times when suing a company is a good thing.
Does Coca-Cola FORCE you to drink their products? You know good and damn well than any product consumed besides natural water could possibly be a risk to your health.
Consumers playing ignorant seems to be the norm today.. Play ignorant; hire a lawyer and sue.. thats all this amounts to..
I suppose Coca-Cola could just start putting pesticides in coke and blame the consumer for ignorance. An idiot is YOU!
Originally posted by: sdifox
Food products have to be safe to consume. Benzine is not safe to consume. Lawsuit legit.
Originally posted by: JS80
Originally posted by: jman19
Originally posted by: JS80
Originally posted by: Thraxen
Originally posted by: JS80
the sun causes cancer. should God/Universe/Physics/Stephen Hawking get sued too?
LOL... you are naming things that are pretty much common knowledge, or in the case of the sun, just plain dumb. Do you honestly think the general public knows anything about benzene?
i guess that's why out of the billion people who drink coke, the number of people who get cancer from benzene is what? you can't prove benzene from coke causes cancer. living life itself causes cancer. a drop of benzene in a soda pop will NOT give you cancer.
So first you say we shouldn't warn people about everything and sue companies for negligently harming their consumers without warning, now you're saying it doesn't matter because in your quite informed medical opinion benzene won't cause cancer... so which is it?
I never said companies shouldn't warn people. However, it is unreasonable for someone to sue coca cola because one of their preservatives in rare cases can react with other foods you ingest to form benzene to cause cancer. The lawyers on this case don't give a fvck about cancer; they just want to make money off it.
Originally posted by: Amused
Originally posted by: sdifox
Food products have to be safe to consume. Benzine is not safe to consume. Lawsuit legit.
No, there is an arbitrary limit of how much benzine is safe to consume. And that limit is imposed by the FDA on drinking water only.
That's good enough for me.The Food and Drug Administration "has closely reviewed beverages for the presence of benzene in soft drinks several times in the past and each time has found no public health issue," said Coke spokesman Ray A. Crockett.
Originally posted by: jman19
I don't see the problem with this lawsuit. If Coca-Cola is putting harmful ingredients in their drinks that are directly linked to cancer, and there is no warning about this, then they deserve the lawsuit.
But I guess since you aren't forced to drink Coke, they don't have any obligation to the consumer, right? :disgust:
The dose makes the poison. Is there even a single study linking soft drink consumption to human cancer?"There is no supporting documentation to prove how these lawyers conducted these tests," he said. "Their own press release indicates that they have abused the product with heat prior to testing.
FDA officials say there is no safety concern and that levels are still relatively low compared with other sources of exposure to benzene.
The soft drink industry agrees and says the amount of soft drinks people consume is much less than the amount of tap water they are exposed to.
Originally posted by: tk149
Originally posted by: jman19
I don't see the problem with this lawsuit. If Coca-Cola is putting harmful ingredients in their drinks that are directly linked to cancer, and there is no warning about this, then they deserve the lawsuit.
But I guess since you aren't forced to drink Coke, they don't have any obligation to the consumer, right? :disgust:
Did you read the article? :disgust:
The dose makes the poison. Is there even a single study linking soft drink consumption to human cancer?"There is no supporting documentation to prove how these lawyers conducted these tests," he said. "Their own press release indicates that they have abused the product with heat prior to testing.
FDA officials say there is no safety concern and that levels are still relatively low compared with other sources of exposure to benzene.
The soft drink industry agrees and says the amount of soft drinks people consume is much less than the amount of tap water they are exposed to.
OMG!! Orange juice can cause cancer!!Originally posted by: nakedfrog
Benzene can form in soft drinks containing vitamin C, also called ascorbic acid, and either sodium benzoate or potassium benzoate. Scientists say factors such as heat or light exposure can trigger a reaction that forms benzene in the beverages.
If you had read the first post critically, you would have realized that only one Coca-Cola product was added to the lawsuit - Vault Zero.Originally posted by: IAteYourMother
I didn't know there was benzene in coke. lawsuit is justified in my eyes
"There is no supporting documentation to prove how these lawyers conducted these tests," he [Coke's spokesman] said. "Their own press release indicates that they have abused the product with heat prior to testing
As part of the settlement, the smaller companies agreed to pay $35,000 each. Rainer said most of the money will pay legal costs.
