Shh, don't rain on their rage parade. To paraphrase our sharp as a tack VP, they've turned this into a 'big fucking deal'.
let's play with a hypothetical:
As it is apparently true that some
do consider playing only a snippet of the anthem to be offensive, how would the Daily Caller have handled that situation, if CNN aired only a fragment of the song (Against their own policy), without the "warning"?
And, had the Daily Caller ran with that as your daily dose of conservative rage, would you have flown off with it just as with this current...issue?
I suppose the answer depends on a few things, of which I am still confused:
--is it the actual warning that enrages you? Meaning--that there is an assumption that someone should be offended by the anthem?
--is it the existence of any warning? Meaning--is it this anti-PC sort of response that gets your crawl? --the fact that they shouldn't care if anyone should be offended by how they present it, so just play the damn thing however they want?