Bulk Beef
Diamond Member
- Aug 14, 2001
- 5,466
- 0
- 76
Exactly Czar, that is the reason, not an "excuse".dont you get it that is not the point, they were meant for "political purposes" of convincing Iraqies that they were dead
Exactly Czar, that is the reason, not an "excuse".dont you get it that is not the point, they were meant for "political purposes" of convincing Iraqies that they were dead
Originally posted by: Kojak
Originally posted by: bolinger
And Americans whine like school girls when al-Jazeera shows dead US soldiers on TV.
This is for different reasons and displayed under reluctance. You should know better.
Originally posted by: alchemize
Originally posted by: lozina
Originally posted by: alchemize
Originally posted by: shuan24
Well, given the technology Iraq has rite now, 20 bucks says no Iraqi has ever heard of our friend Mr. Photoshop. So, we claim anything we want, and have picture "proof" as well! How bout this for a headline:
"Saddam Hussein is actually MRS Saddam Hussein, and we have the pictures to prove it!"
8====D:Q
Didn't take long for a conspiracy theorist to jump in.
You're on the same boat if you believe everything you are told without questioning.
I seen some of the other photos and they are more convincing, but I still dont fully buy it yet: I'm very suspicous at why they would have such horrible quality photos when they are trying to prove something so important.
OK Let's just debunk the whole "faking it" theory right now with a logical arguement. Let's assaume Uday and Quasay are still alive and the US is faking it. What would I do if I was one of the wonder twins to put huge egg on the face of the US? How about a polaroid with a newspaper dated 7/24/03. Hand it to a Baath buddy to be sent off to al-jazeera.
They are dead. Don't be idiots. The US isn't playing that game...if they were, WMD evidence would have already been planted, and this would have been done long ago.
I don't believe everything I'm told without questioning. But I am intelligent enough to note a logical gap about a mile wide in assuming conspiracy.
Oh wait maybe they actually turned themselves in, and the US agreed to put them in the witness protection program, and once they interview them, they are going to be plumbers in New Jersey with different identities. You watch too many movies...
Nobody has claimed that they are. Kind of a crucial difference for the purposes of this discussion.Has Osama Bin Laden presented a picture of himself with the current newspaper? Or how about Saddam hussein? Do you believe they are dead too then?
Originally posted by: Tripleshot
What do you want to bet that security is doubled or tripled for Bush daughters?
Originally posted by: seawolf21
Originally posted by: Kojak
Originally posted by: bolinger
And Americans whine like school girls when al-Jazeera shows dead US soldiers on TV.
This is for different reasons and displayed under reluctance. You should know better.
What difference is that? It's done for propaganda. We're doing it to convince Iraqis the old guard is not coming back to influence them to cooperate with us. The Iraqis did it to convince the America public that this is what's going to happen to your soldiers to influence us to call our senators.
Has Osama Bin Laden presented a picture of himself with the current newspaper? Or how about Saddam hussein? Do you believe they are dead too then?
It's good to have an open mind, especially under these circumstances.
Originally posted by: AndrewR
One or both of them have probably been wounded or have been sick and show it. Releasing a picture or a video would prove that the US has them running scared and would probably do more harm than good.
An "open mind" does not mean staring a fact squarely in the face and doubting its existence. That's called lunacy.
Originally posted by: WinstonSmith
It is a crappy picture, but you can bet it's them. It was rightly pointed out that if these two showed up later, the crap would hit the fan. Not even Bush is that dumb.
Originally posted by: lozina
Originally posted by: WinstonSmith
It is a crappy picture, but you can bet it's them. It was rightly pointed out that if these two showed up later, the crap would hit the fan. Not even Bush is that dumb.
I've never said I believe they are alive or dead, I'm just pointing out the half-assed way the Pentagon goes about trying to prove something to the World.
Originally posted by: AndrewR
Originally posted by: seawolf21
Originally posted by: Kojak
Originally posted by: bolinger
And Americans whine like school girls when al-Jazeera shows dead US soldiers on TV.
This is for different reasons and displayed under reluctance. You should know better.
What difference is that? It's done for propaganda. We're doing it to convince Iraqis the old guard is not coming back to influence them to cooperate with us. The Iraqis did it to convince the America public that this is what's going to happen to your soldiers to influence us to call our senators.
It was done to counter the fallacious notion that they were in fact not dead, as propagated by some Iraqis, some Western news agencies, some other news agencies, and some people on this board. The intent was to prove the veracity of the US in this matter.
Originally posted by: seawolf21
Originally posted by: AndrewR
Originally posted by: seawolf21
Originally posted by: Kojak
Originally posted by: bolinger
And Americans whine like school girls when al-Jazeera shows dead US soldiers on TV.
This is for different reasons and displayed under reluctance. You should know better.
What difference is that? It's done for propaganda. We're doing it to convince Iraqis the old guard is not coming back to influence them to cooperate with us. The Iraqis did it to convince the America public that this is what's going to happen to your soldiers to influence us to call our senators.
It was done to counter the fallacious notion that they were in fact not dead, as propagated by some Iraqis, some Western news agencies, some other news agencies, and some people on this board. The intent was to prove the veracity of the US in this matter.
Again, what difference is there? The pictures of dead US soliders proved that US soliders were dying. It was broadcast as propaganda by Al-Jazeera and it is now propaganda by the Pentagon. The bottom line is that Rumsfield is not much better than those who decided to broadcast dead American soliders.
Originally posted by: Lucky
Originally posted by: lozina
Originally posted by: WinstonSmith
It is a crappy picture, but you can bet it's them. It was rightly pointed out that if these two showed up later, the crap would hit the fan. Not even Bush is that dumb.
I've never said I believe they are alive or dead, I'm just pointing out the half-assed way the Pentagon goes about trying to prove something to the World.
You just saw poor quality repro's. The ones provided on the CD given to news agencies are of relatively high quality.
On the news tonight, they said the Iraqi people believe that they are fake. Can you blame them? Who would trust an American besides cadguy?
Originally posted by: CADkindaGUY
Originally posted by: seawolf21
Originally posted by: AndrewR
Originally posted by: seawolf21
Originally posted by: Kojak
Originally posted by: bolinger
And Americans whine like school girls when al-Jazeera shows dead US soldiers on TV.
This is for different reasons and displayed under reluctance. You should know better.
What difference is that? It's done for propaganda. We're doing it to convince Iraqis the old guard is not coming back to influence them to cooperate with us. The Iraqis did it to convince the America public that this is what's going to happen to your soldiers to influence us to call our senators.
It was done to counter the fallacious notion that they were in fact not dead, as propagated by some Iraqis, some Western news agencies, some other news agencies, and some people on this board. The intent was to prove the veracity of the US in this matter.
Again, what difference is there? The pictures of dead US soliders proved that US soliders were dying. It was broadcast as propaganda by Al-Jazeera and it is now propaganda by the Pentagon. The bottom line is that Rumsfield is not much better than those who decided to broadcast dead American soliders.
You want "proof" then blast them for showing proof. Nice.
CkG