Karl Agathon
Golden Member
- Sep 30, 2010
- 1,081
- 0
- 0
I was kinda hoping a cat fight would break out.
LOL :thumbsup:
I was kinda hoping a cat fight would break out.
I always keep recalling to myself that you once said you would leave and never come back. Why is that?This whole fucking forum is an ugly pile of shit.
Ah Newsbusters, truthyness at its finest!
Ok, I went and watched the entire video full screen this time. So, yeah, once, Incidentally, accidentally, she got some under one arm. It was unintentional as the woman repeatedly moved into her way as she was trying to spray paint the poster.
What you said was a deliberate LIE on your part, a deliberate mischaracterization of what happened.
Here's the FUCKING LIE YOU TOLD.
You are The SCUMBAG FUCKING LIAR here.
Sprayer is a self righteous bitch and should be arrested for vandalism.
The other woman is a busy body kinda like those people that drive slow in the fast lane so other people don't speed. She was hardly "assaulted" and I don't feel sorry for her.
Personally I think the video reflects poorly on both women, both of whom seem wildly melodramatic. The irony of Eltahawy being a journalist and engaging in this behavior is not lost on me. That being said, I'd have a hard time calling this criminal assault because she goes out of her way over and over to avoid painting the other woman, and ultimately the other woman is the first one to lay hands on the other person in the confrontation. The whole thing seems like asshole-on-asshole "crime."
Which is why I also posted a link to CBS news. The best information was from the New York Post though who were the ones that filmed the whole thing for the activist.
http://www.nypost.com/p/news/local/paint_misbehavin_VYd6yL8Q3RJbTDYFxX3MjK
It's fairly disingenuous to post what you did MoonVillage; But I wonder, where's perks' rage over almost every news article I've seen DMCohen post?
It's funny how the woman with the spray can thought she was making a statement on "Freedom of Speech" by censoring the ad she disagreed with and attempting to cover it up with spray paint so that no one else could see or read it.
Yeah oddly defacing other people's property is not considered freedom of speech.
Maybe we should start considering punching people in the face who piss off to be an expression of non-verbal speech?
False equivalence much?
you're right. destroying (not defacing) the property of the EIT company was not a protected right of the colonists--and it still would not be.
and it still isn't speech.
Moderate Muslims: "We agree with Freedom of Speech and Freedom of expression, we agree with denying the Holocaust or even denying the Earth is round...Just dont mention Islam or the Prophet though or we will go batshit crazy Jihad ALLAHLALALALALA on your infidel ass."
I guess you're too ignorant to know that it took place about 240 years ago before there was a 1st Amendment? Idiot.
Thanks
I was wondering what was up with the sails and funny hats