CNN Interview with Palin

[seemingly random]

Originally posted by: JohnOfSheffield

Originally posted by: seemingly random

Originally posted by: JohnOfSheffield

Originally posted by: seemingly random

Originally posted by: Red Dawn
The fact is she's not intellectually qualified (and never will be) for the position and McCain put himself before the country by choosing her as his running mate.

I get a kick from comments like "she isn't ready yet", when she never will be.

Wait until 2012, Rove will be reincarnated by then.

You're just trying to ruin my day, aren't you?

I thought it was common knowledge?

If Palin wins and Brown is in office, i'm emigrating to Japan.

I hear land's pretty cheap in afghanistan - lots of rolling hills and mountains with beautiful vistas - many prebuilt homes that've been around for thousands of years (albeit, a little damp).

 

[Corbett]

Originally posted by: PC Surgeon

Originally posted by: Corbett

I's say its a few things. She has executive experience.

What is does that mean? Exactly?

Executive Experience is defined as experience where one is the top (or 2nd top) decision maker for the company, State, large military unit, etc.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/L...s_executive_experience

Originally posted by: PC Surgeon

She has a history of fighting corruption.

How so? Can you provide documents to support this claim?

Governor Murkowski appointed Palin to the Alaska Oil and Gas Conservation Commission.[65] She chaired the Commission beginning in 2003, serving as Ethics Supervisor.[66] Palin resigned in January 2004, protesting what she called the "lack of ethics" of fellow Republican members.[67][68]
After resigning, Palin filed a formal complaint against Oil and Gas Conservation Commissioner Randy Ruedrich, also the chair of the state Republican Party,[69] accusing him of doing work for the party on public time and of working closely with a company he was supposed to be regulating. She also joined with Democratic legislator Eric Croft[70] to file a complaint against Gregg Renkes, a former Alaska Attorney General,[71] accusing him of having a financial conflict of interest in negotiating a coal exporting trade agreement,[72] while Renkes was the subject of investigation and after records suggesting a possible conflict of interest had been released to the public.[73] Ruedrich and Renkes both resigned and Ruedrich paid a record $12,000 fine.[66][74]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sarah_Palin[/quote]

Originally posted by: PC Surgeon

Shes a social and fiscal conservative.

How so? Please define the things she has done to cut spending. Please define social conservative.

Was against the Bridge to Nowhere. Sold governor's jet. Fought for rebate from gas profits in Alaska.

Social Conservative : http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social_conservatism

Originally posted by: PC Surgeon

Shes fought pork and "politics as usual" in her own state.

You mean like the "bridge to nowhere"?

Yes

Originally posted by: PC Surgeon

She's a reformer.

What did she reform? Exactly?

I see a lot of "buzzwords" but not much proof.

She reformed the Alaskan government through some of the above points I have made. now please, go ahead and disassemble each of my points because we both know you already knew my answers to all of these. Or are you going to ask me to explain what a social conservative is "exactly"?
[/quote]

 

[JohnOfSheffield]

Originally posted by: seemingly random

Originally posted by: JohnOfSheffield

Originally posted by: seemingly random

Originally posted by: JohnOfSheffield

Originally posted by: seemingly random

Originally posted by: Red Dawn
The fact is she's not intellectually qualified (and never will be) for the position and McCain put himself before the country by choosing her as his running mate.

I get a kick from comments like "she isn't ready yet", when she never will be.

Wait until 2012, Rove will be reincarnated by then.

You're just trying to ruin my day, aren't you?

I thought it was common knowledge?

If Palin wins and Brown is in office, i'm emigrating to Japan.

I hear land's pretty cheap in afghanistan - lots of rolling hills and mountains with beautiful vistas - many prebuilt homes that've been around for thousands of years (albeit, a little damp).

*sigh* yeah, i'll probably be staying here for quite a fucking while.

I'm counting on Obama to fix this fucked up situation and give us some authority where we already are.

Yeah, i'm counting on a politician, that's how fucking screwed we are.

 

[Corbett]

Originally posted by: MaxisOne
Corbett ...

I am disappointed that you cannot give a straight answer to a very simple question without comparing the candidates. I guess ill take it that you are either ashamed to "Fully" support your candidate publicly or simply someone who cannot have an honest and reasonable discussion with anyone. While it is clearly obvious that this board has a Democratic tilt i was hoping that through all the crap that goes on in this board Some level of respectable non BS discourse could be reached. The fact that you feel it necessary to dance around a very narrow question as it was presented gives me the impression that i may need to try to engage someone else in effective and objective discussion..


In any case good luck to you and your candidate.

I answered your question. You are right, it is a very narrow one. Let me try asking you one.

You have 2 children and a man with a gun is going to kill one. There is nothing you can do to stop it. Which one do you choose to die?

What you are trying to do is trap me under the guise of trying to have a "honest discussion". I'm not falling for it.

 

[JohnOfSheffield]

Originally posted by: Corbett

Originally posted by: PC Surgeon

Originally posted by: Corbett

I's say its a few things. She has executive experience.

What is does that mean? Exactly?

Executive Experience is defined as experience where one is the top (or 2nd top) decision maker for the company, State, large military unit, etc.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/L...s_executive_experience

Originally posted by: PC Surgeon

She has a history of fighting corruption.

How so? Can you provide documents to support this claim?

Governor Murkowski appointed Palin to the Alaska Oil and Gas Conservation Commission.[65] She chaired the Commission beginning in 2003, serving as Ethics Supervisor.[66] Palin resigned in January 2004, protesting what she called the "lack of ethics" of fellow Republican members.[67][68]
After resigning, Palin filed a formal complaint against Oil and Gas Conservation Commissioner Randy Ruedrich, also the chair of the state Republican Party,[69] accusing him of doing work for the party on public time and of working closely with a company he was supposed to be regulating. She also joined with Democratic legislator Eric Croft[70] to file a complaint against Gregg Renkes, a former Alaska Attorney General,[71] accusing him of having a financial conflict of interest in negotiating a coal exporting trade agreement,[72] while Renkes was the subject of investigation and after records suggesting a possible conflict of interest had been released to the public.[73] Ruedrich and Renkes both resigned and Ruedrich paid a record $12,000 fine.[66][74]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sarah_Palin

Originally posted by: PC Surgeon

Shes a social and fiscal conservative.

How so? Please define the things she has done to cut spending. Please define social conservative.

Was against the Bridge to Nowhere. Sold governor's jet. Fought for rebate from gas profits in Alaska.

Social Conservative : http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social_conservatism

Originally posted by: PC Surgeon

Shes fought pork and "politics as usual" in her own state.

You mean like the "bridge to nowhere"?

Yes

Originally posted by: PC Surgeon

She's a reformer.

What did she reform? Exactly?

I see a lot of "buzzwords" but not much proof.

She reformed the Alaskan government through some of the above points I have made. now please, go ahead and disassemble each of my points because we both know you already knew my answers to all of these. Or are you going to ask me to explain what a social conservative is "exactly"?
[/quote]


[/quote]

Most of all, she instituted the "book burning" clause the "i'll fire whoever i want for whatever reason i want" clause and said fuck Santa Clause, this is a Christian nation!

 

[shira]

Originally posted by: PC Surgeon

Originally posted by: Farang
If you don't like Palin and you're a fan of Hardball, this is a nice exchange: http://www.jedreport.com/2008/...cains-own-aides-c.html

The sighing laugh is quite telling. She was clearly over matched and trying to defend the indefensible.

On the other hand, she's awfully cute and always kept a smile on her face.

 

[JohnOfSheffield]

Originally posted by: Corbett

Originally posted by: MaxisOne
Corbett ...

I am disappointed that you cannot give a straight answer to a very simple question without comparing the candidates. I guess ill take it that you are either ashamed to "Fully" support your candidate publicly or simply someone who cannot have an honest and reasonable discussion with anyone. While it is clearly obvious that this board has a Democratic tilt i was hoping that through all the crap that goes on in this board Some level of respectable non BS discourse could be reached. The fact that you feel it necessary to dance around a very narrow question as it was presented gives me the impression that i may need to try to engage someone else in effective and objective discussion..


In any case good luck to you and your candidate.

I answered your question. You are right, it is a very narrow one. Let me try asking you one.

You have 2 children and a man with a gun is going to kill one. There is nothing you can do to stop it. Which one do you choose to die?

I'd kill the man.

 

[Corbett]

Originally posted by: JohnOfSheffield

Originally posted by: Corbett

Originally posted by: MaxisOne
Corbett ...

I am disappointed that you cannot give a straight answer to a very simple question without comparing the candidates. I guess ill take it that you are either ashamed to "Fully" support your candidate publicly or simply someone who cannot have an honest and reasonable discussion with anyone. While it is clearly obvious that this board has a Democratic tilt i was hoping that through all the crap that goes on in this board Some level of respectable non BS discourse could be reached. The fact that you feel it necessary to dance around a very narrow question as it was presented gives me the impression that i may need to try to engage someone else in effective and objective discussion..


In any case good luck to you and your candidate.

I answered your question. You are right, it is a very narrow one. Let me try asking you one.

You have 2 children and a man with a gun is going to kill one. There is nothing you can do to stop it. Which one do you choose to die?

I'd kill the man.

Reading comprehension FTL.

 

[shira]

Originally posted by: MaxisOne
Corbett ...

I am disappointed that you cannot give a straight answer to a very simple question without comparing the candidates. I guess ill take it that you are either ashamed to "Fully" support your candidate publicly or simply someone who cannot have an honest and reasonable discussion with anyone. While it is clearly obvious that this board has a Democratic tilt i was hoping that through all the crap that goes on in this board Some level of respectable non BS discourse could be reached. The fact that you feel it necessary to dance around a very narrow question as it was presented gives me the impression that i may need to try to engage someone else in effective and objective discussion..


In any case good luck to you and your candidate.

Corbett's real answer is that he realizes Palin is the least qualified VP candidate in memory, but his preference for McCain over Obama is so great that he prays a President McCain is able to live out his term.

 

[UberNeuman]

Originally posted by: shira

Corbett's real answer is that he realizes Palin is the least qualified VP candidate in memory, but his preference for McCain over Obama is so great that he prays a President McCain is able to live out his term.

No. His real answer would be that if McCain doesn't finish his term, so that Palin could become president, then so much the better.....

The fundies overplayed their hand with Terri Schiavo, but that doesn't mean they're going to give up...

 

[JohnOfSheffield]

Originally posted by: Corbett

Originally posted by: JohnOfSheffield

Originally posted by: Corbett

Originally posted by: MaxisOne
Corbett ...

I am disappointed that you cannot give a straight answer to a very simple question without comparing the candidates. I guess ill take it that you are either ashamed to "Fully" support your candidate publicly or simply someone who cannot have an honest and reasonable discussion with anyone. While it is clearly obvious that this board has a Democratic tilt i was hoping that through all the crap that goes on in this board Some level of respectable non BS discourse could be reached. The fact that you feel it necessary to dance around a very narrow question as it was presented gives me the impression that i may need to try to engage someone else in effective and objective discussion..


In any case good luck to you and your candidate.

I answered your question. You are right, it is a very narrow one. Let me try asking you one.

You have 2 children and a man with a gun is going to kill one. There is nothing you can do to stop it. Which one do you choose to die?

I'd kill the man.

Reading comprehension FTL.

Braindeath FTL.

I got that he was going to kill one of them and i cannot stop that, your question was what would i do and my answer was that after he made the kill i couldn't stop, i'd kill him.

Push the Christ out of you fucking mind, it's blocking your ability to think.

 

[andy04]

Originally posted by: Corbett

Originally posted by: MaxisOne
Ok Ive looked for Corbett's response to the question posed and i have not seen the answer.

Corbett Seriously ... without the bullshit political answers, the changing of the subject and the answering of questions with another question.

Do you think Sarah Palin is ready to be President of the United States of America considering the fact that there is a possibility of her assuming that role as written by the law of the land?

Can you just give me an answer ? If its yes its yes .. I personally wont condemn you for your opinion ... but i would like to know what your honest opinion is ...

plain and simple...


Good Day ..

Just answer the bloody question please.. The question is a plain as day ... I think the answer should be as well.

I think Palin is just as ready to be president as Obama is, if not, more.

+1

 

[UberNeuman]

Originally posted by: JohnOfSheffield

Originally posted by: Corbett

Originally posted by: JohnOfSheffield

Originally posted by: Corbett

Originally posted by: MaxisOne
Corbett ...

I am disappointed that you cannot give a straight answer to a very simple question without comparing the candidates. I guess ill take it that you are either ashamed to "Fully" support your candidate publicly or simply someone who cannot have an honest and reasonable discussion with anyone. While it is clearly obvious that this board has a Democratic tilt i was hoping that through all the crap that goes on in this board Some level of respectable non BS discourse could be reached. The fact that you feel it necessary to dance around a very narrow question as it was presented gives me the impression that i may need to try to engage someone else in effective and objective discussion..


In any case good luck to you and your candidate.

I answered your question. You are right, it is a very narrow one. Let me try asking you one.

You have 2 children and a man with a gun is going to kill one. There is nothing you can do to stop it. Which one do you choose to die?

I'd kill the man.

Reading comprehension FTL.

Braindeath FTL.

I got that he was going to kill one of them and i cannot stop that, your question was what would i do and my answer was that after he made the kill i couldn't stop, i'd kill him.

Push the Christ out of you fucking mind, it's blocking your ability to think.

Good to see you back, John...

 

[andy04]

Originally posted by: UberNeuman

Originally posted by: JohnOfSheffield

Originally posted by: Corbett

Originally posted by: JohnOfSheffield

Originally posted by: Corbett

Originally posted by: MaxisOne
Corbett ...

I am disappointed that you cannot give a straight answer to a very simple question without comparing the candidates. I guess ill take it that you are either ashamed to "Fully" support your candidate publicly or simply someone who cannot have an honest and reasonable discussion with anyone. While it is clearly obvious that this board has a Democratic tilt i was hoping that through all the crap that goes on in this board Some level of respectable non BS discourse could be reached. The fact that you feel it necessary to dance around a very narrow question as it was presented gives me the impression that i may need to try to engage someone else in effective and objective discussion..


In any case good luck to you and your candidate.

I answered your question. You are right, it is a very narrow one. Let me try asking you one.

You have 2 children and a man with a gun is going to kill one. There is nothing you can do to stop it. Which one do you choose to die?

I'd kill the man.

Reading comprehension FTL.

Braindeath FTL.

I got that he was going to kill one of them and i cannot stop that, your question was what would i do and my answer was that after he made the kill i couldn't stop, i'd kill him.

Push the Christ out of you fucking mind, it's blocking your ability to think.

Good to see you back, John...

why... all you num nuts were not enough for Corbett, need another one?

 

[Corbett]

Originally posted by: JohnOfSheffield

Originally posted by: Corbett

Originally posted by: JohnOfSheffield

Originally posted by: Corbett

Originally posted by: MaxisOne
Corbett ...

I am disappointed that you cannot give a straight answer to a very simple question without comparing the candidates. I guess ill take it that you are either ashamed to "Fully" support your candidate publicly or simply someone who cannot have an honest and reasonable discussion with anyone. While it is clearly obvious that this board has a Democratic tilt i was hoping that through all the crap that goes on in this board Some level of respectable non BS discourse could be reached. The fact that you feel it necessary to dance around a very narrow question as it was presented gives me the impression that i may need to try to engage someone else in effective and objective discussion..


In any case good luck to you and your candidate.

I answered your question. You are right, it is a very narrow one. Let me try asking you one.

You have 2 children and a man with a gun is going to kill one. There is nothing you can do to stop it. Which one do you choose to die?

I'd kill the man.

Reading comprehension FTL.

Braindeath FTL.

I got that he was going to kill one of them and i cannot stop that, your question was what would i do and my answer was that after he made the kill i couldn't stop, i'd kill him.

Push the Christ out of you fucking mind, it's blocking your ability to think.

If you want ot call yourself braindead too, thats fine with me. Your latest response is only a cover for your previous one. But again, it went over your head in the first place so nevermind.

 

[UberNeuman]

Originally posted by: andy04

why... all you num nuts were not enough for Corbett, need another one?

It makes up for the lack of sack you seem to have.......

 

[Budmantom]

Originally posted by: UberNeuman

Originally posted by: andy04

why... all you num nuts were not enough for Corbett, need another one?

It makes up for the lack of sack you seem to have.......

What were you doing down there?

Forget it I don't want to know....

 

[OneOfTheseDays]

Originally posted by: Corbett

Originally posted by: MaxisOne
Corbett ...

I am disappointed that you cannot give a straight answer to a very simple question without comparing the candidates. I guess ill take it that you are either ashamed to "Fully" support your candidate publicly or simply someone who cannot have an honest and reasonable discussion with anyone. While it is clearly obvious that this board has a Democratic tilt i was hoping that through all the crap that goes on in this board Some level of respectable non BS discourse could be reached. The fact that you feel it necessary to dance around a very narrow question as it was presented gives me the impression that i may need to try to engage someone else in effective and objective discussion..


In any case good luck to you and your candidate.

I answered your question. You are right, it is a very narrow one. Let me try asking you one.

You have 2 children and a man with a gun is going to kill one. There is nothing you can do to stop it. Which one do you choose to die?

What you are trying to do is trap me under the guise of trying to have a "honest discussion". I'm not falling for it.

No they are asking you a very simple question about whether or not you believe Sarah Palin is qualified to become President of the United States should something happen to McCain if he were elected.

The fact that it has taken 6 pages for you to answer this question speaks volumes about you more than anything else.

 

[JohnOfSheffield]

Originally posted by: Corbett

Originally posted by: JohnOfSheffield

Originally posted by: Corbett

Originally posted by: JohnOfSheffield

Originally posted by: Corbett

Originally posted by: MaxisOne
Corbett ...

I am disappointed that you cannot give a straight answer to a very simple question without comparing the candidates. I guess ill take it that you are either ashamed to "Fully" support your candidate publicly or simply someone who cannot have an honest and reasonable discussion with anyone. While it is clearly obvious that this board has a Democratic tilt i was hoping that through all the crap that goes on in this board Some level of respectable non BS discourse could be reached. The fact that you feel it necessary to dance around a very narrow question as it was presented gives me the impression that i may need to try to engage someone else in effective and objective discussion..


In any case good luck to you and your candidate.

I answered your question. You are right, it is a very narrow one. Let me try asking you one.

You have 2 children and a man with a gun is going to kill one. There is nothing you can do to stop it. Which one do you choose to die?

I'd kill the man.

Reading comprehension FTL.

Braindeath FTL.

I got that he was going to kill one of them and i cannot stop that, your question was what would i do and my answer was that after he made the kill i couldn't stop, i'd kill him.

Push the Christ out of you fucking mind, it's blocking your ability to think.

If you want ot call yourself braindead too, thats fine with me. Your latest response is only a cover for your previous one. But again, it went over your head in the first place so nevermind.

Worst. Comeback. I've Seen.

You gave the premise (i CANNOT STOP IT), i answered it (I'D KILL HIM), you called me on reading comprehension since you didn't understand what i posted and now you are telling ME that i'm dishonest?

You're some piece of work, aren't you, but i guess you'd be pretty good at lying, even to yourself at this point, eh?

Pathetic.

 

[OneOfTheseDays]

I find it hard to believe that someone who has studied Sarah Palin can arrive at the conclusion that she is a maverick reformer and fiscal conservative.

 

[JohnOfSheffield]

Originally posted by: OneOfTheseDays
I find it hard to believe that someone who has studied Sarah Palin can arrive at the conclusion that she is a maverick reformer and fiscal conservative.

Well i guess if they read it in Greek and don't understand Greek then maybe.

 

[OneOfTheseDays]

Originally posted by: JohnOfSheffield

Originally posted by: OneOfTheseDays
I find it hard to believe that someone who has studied Sarah Palin can arrive at the conclusion that she is a maverick reformer and fiscal conservative.

Well i guess if they read it in Greek and don't understand Greek then maybe.

No it's more likely Corbett is refusing to acknowledge the mountains of evidence that prove that Palin was just the opposite of what she claims to be. Her latest $150,000 spending spree on clothing is the ultimate hypocrisy. Of course Corbett will find ways in his brain to rationalize it.

 

[JohnOfSheffield]

Originally posted by: OneOfTheseDays

Originally posted by: JohnOfSheffield

Originally posted by: OneOfTheseDays
I find it hard to believe that someone who has studied Sarah Palin can arrive at the conclusion that she is a maverick reformer and fiscal conservative.

Well i guess if they read it in Greek and don't understand Greek then maybe.

No it's more likely Corbett is refusing to acknowledge the mountains of evidence that prove that Palin was just the opposite of what she claims to be. Her latest $150,000 spending spree on clothing is the ultimate hypocrisy. Of course Corbett will find ways in his brain to rationalize it.

Look above, he can't even understand a three word sentence, i am fully aware of his inteptitude.

Only way i like Palin is if Tina Fey is doing her... i'm so hot for her. ... crikey!

 

[seemingly random]

Originally posted by: andy04

Originally posted by: Corbett

...

I think Palin is just as ready to be president as Obama is, if not, more.

+1

It's one thing for a person to be loyal and spout partisan drivel, but hopefully you don't really believe this. It would truly be the result of poisoned repug koolaid.

 

[Mr. Lennon]

Originally posted by: Corbett

Originally posted by: Farang
Corbett - without mentioning Obama, do you think Palin is ready to be President of the United States?

I think Palin is ready to be Vice President of the United States.

Fail.

I nominate Corbett for most failed McSame supporter on AT.

Keep it up, this thread could be nominated for self pwnage at the end of the year.