cnn.com is doing the absentee ballots...bush is ahead 339 votes

Justin

Senior member
Oct 9, 1999
295
0
0
Good lord, how many recounts is it going to take before the stupid dems realize that no matter how much they whine and cry they still friggin' lost!
 

ride525

Golden Member
Oct 14, 1999
1,379
0
0


<< Good lord, how many recounts is it going to take before the stupid dems realize that no matter how much they whine and cry they still friggin' lost! >>



Just the ONE they asked for...I think the Dems would be happy if they could just get the one manual count done that they asked for...
 

Bryan

Diamond Member
Oct 9, 1999
3,070
5
86


<< I think the Dems would be happy if they could just get the one manual count done that they asked for... >>



Yeah, because Gore is sure his guys will get the job done this time around. Third time's a charm, right? :p
 

TSDible

Golden Member
Nov 4, 1999
1,697
0
76
Lets be realistic here....

Take a look at the forum you are in.... Would you really trust a group of your peers to count to around 6 million for you, or would you rather have a computer do it for you? Machines are reliable. We all know what will happen when human error is introduced.

.... oh yeah... and can we stay clear of the whole flawed pentium argument. :D
 

bigvince

Banned
Aug 25, 2000
1,201
0
0
some how i think the manual recounts are going something like this...

one for bush, one,two for gore one for bush, one, two, three, for gore one for bush, one, two, three, four, for gore.....;)
 

Bryan

Diamond Member
Oct 9, 1999
3,070
5
86
That's how the first recount went in PB County, except that Al Sore (Loser) was shocked to learn that they didn't find enough to put him over.
 

ride525

Golden Member
Oct 14, 1999
1,379
0
0


<< Yeah, because Gore is sure his guys will get the job done this time around. Third time's a charm, right? >>



Looks like you are correct. ;)