CNN Breaking News - Judge Issues Gag order on participants for Scott Peterson case

[conjur]

news link

 

[SuperTool]

Did he say what kind of gag is to be used? Is it one of those rubber balls with a strap?

 

[Looney]

These needs to be issued? I thought it was some sort of law or something that you can't talk about a trial if you're still functionin gas a juror.

 

[Lucky]

wtf are you talking about? they havent even selected jurors yet.

 

[BOBDN]

I find it odd.

OJ is accused of murdering his wife and a "friend" - he's locked up and everyone is screaming for his head.

This guy is accused of murdering his pregnant wife and baby, he walks around FREE for months, and to the public it's like - "no big news."

WTFIUWT

 

[UltraQuiet]

Originally posted by: BOBDN
I find it odd.

OJ is accused of murdering his wife and a "friend" - he's locked up and everyone is screaming for his head.

This guy is accused of murdering his pregnant wife and baby, he walks around FREE for months, and to the public it's like - "no big news."

WTFIUWT

Scott Petersen was not a celebrity before this happened.

 

[etech]

Originally posted by: BOBDN
I find it odd.

OJ is accused of murdering his wife and a "friend" - he's locked up and everyone is screaming for his head.

This guy is accused of murdering his pregnant wife and baby, he walks around FREE for months, and to the public it's like - "no big news."

WTFIUWT

OJ was arrested when he became the prime suspect as was Petersen, there is nothing odd about it except your lack of knowledge of the cases.

The only thing I find odd is why the Petersen case, while tragic, is receiving so much publicity.

 

[BOBDN]

Originally posted by: Ultra Quiet

Originally posted by: BOBDN
I find it odd.

OJ is accused of murdering his wife and a "friend" - he's locked up and everyone is screaming for his head.

This guy is accused of murdering his pregnant wife and baby, he walks around FREE for months, and to the public it's like - "no big news."

WTFIUWT

Scott Petersen was not a celebrity before this happened.

So it's OK to selectively enforce the law and arrest and jail only celebrities for murder?

 

[BOBDN]

Originally posted by: etech

Originally posted by: BOBDN
I find it odd.

OJ is accused of murdering his wife and a "friend" - he's locked up and everyone is screaming for his head.

This guy is accused of murdering his pregnant wife and baby, he walks around FREE for months, and to the public it's like - "no big news."

WTFIUWT

OJ was arrested when he became the prime suspect as was Petersen, there is nothing odd about it except your lack of knowledge of the cases.

The only thing I find odd is why the Petersen case, while tragic, is receiving so much publicity.

Just because we disagree doesn't mean I have no knowledge of the cases. I have some knowledge of the cases. And other cases where the husband is the prime suspect. My question is why are some treated differently than others?

 

[UltraQuiet]

Originally posted by: BOBDN

Originally posted by: Ultra Quiet

Originally posted by: BOBDN
I find it odd.

OJ is accused of murdering his wife and a "friend" - he's locked up and everyone is screaming for his head.

This guy is accused of murdering his pregnant wife and baby, he walks around FREE for months, and to the public it's like - "no big news."

WTFIUWT

Scott Petersen was not a celebrity before this happened.

So it's OK to selectively enforce the law and arrest and jail only celebrities for murder?

How the fsck did you arrive at that fscked up conclusion based on what I posted. OJ's arrest and trial received a lot more press because he was a celebrity.

 

[BOBDN]

Originally posted by: Ultra Quiet

Originally posted by: BOBDN

Originally posted by: Ultra Quiet

Originally posted by: BOBDN
I find it odd.

OJ is accused of murdering his wife and a "friend" - he's locked up and everyone is screaming for his head.

This guy is accused of murdering his pregnant wife and baby, he walks around FREE for months, and to the public it's like - "no big news."

WTFIUWT

Scott Petersen was not a celebrity before this happened.

So it's OK to selectively enforce the law and arrest and jail only celebrities for murder?

How the fsck did you arrive at that fscked up conclusion based on what I posted. OJ's arrest and trial received a lot more press because he was a celebrity.

Man, you're in a foul mood.

I arrived at my conclusion based on your statement that Peterson was not a celebrity before this happened. That would imply the only reason OJ was treated differently than Peterson is that he is a celebrity. Therefore, is it OK to selectively enforce the law and arrest and jail only celebrities who are accused of murder?

 

[Lucky]

He wasnt arrested because there was no evidence. I still haven't heard of much evidence that points to him. The only thing I've heard is *one* hair on a pair of pliers on his boat.

There was a *bit* more evidence against OJ. Plus, there was a body-right away.

 

[conjur]

link

Not jurors...my bad...all 'participants'

 

[BOBDN]

Originally posted by: Lucky
He wasnt arrested because there was no evidence. I still haven't heard of much evidence that points to him. The only thing I've heard is *one* hair on a pair of pliers on his boat.

There was a *bit* more evidence against OJ. Plus, there was a body-right away.

A *bit* more evidence? What, a pair of gloves (that don't fit)? A pair of shoes? A *bump* in the night? Some blood that took a tour of L.A. before making it to the lab for testing? An impossible time line? The "plaintive wail" of a dog?

Peterson had to be the prime suspect. The husband always is. So why weren't charges brought against him? They could have easily found the same quality evidence, I'm sure. Evidence is always easy to find. Just call in Mark Furman.

 

[ViRGE]

Originally posted by: BOBDN

Originally posted by: Lucky
He wasnt arrested because there was no evidence. I still haven't heard of much evidence that points to him. The only thing I've heard is *one* hair on a pair of pliers on his boat.

There was a *bit* more evidence against OJ. Plus, there was a body-right away.

A *bit* more evidence? What, a pair of gloves (that don't fit)? A pair of shoes? A *bump* in the night? Some blood that took a tour of L.A. before making it to the lab for testing? An impossible time line? The "plaintive wail" of a dog?

Peterson had to be the prime suspect. The husband always is. So why weren't charges brought against him? They could have easily found the same quality evidence, I'm sure. Evidence is always easy to find. Just call in Mark Furman.

Because you can't very well arrest someone until you have at least some good evidence. It's part of due process.