• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

CMOS vs. CCD

Originally posted by: GTaudiophile
CMOS...especially in low light!

Canon > Nikon 😀

not starting that again but on paper CCD > CMOS


theres a reason NASA uses CCDs to takes thoes awsome pics of hurricanes attacking florida
 
Originally posted by: Anubis
Originally posted by: GTaudiophile
CMOS...especially in low light!

Canon > Nikon 😀

not starting that again but on paper CCD > CMOS


theres a reason NASA uses CCDs to takes thoes awsome pics of hurricanes attacking florida

Kick backs?
 
Originally posted by: glen
Originally posted by: Anubis
Originally posted by: GTaudiophile
CMOS...especially in low light!

Canon > Nikon 😀

not starting that again but on paper CCD > CMOS

theres a reason NASA uses CCDs to takes thoes awsome pics of hurricanes attacking florida

Kick backs?

LOL! 😀

Cheers glen :beer:
 
From what I am reading, CCD is better.
But, soemthing about Caon, (Kick backs to Rossman) makes folsk liek them better.
 
Back
Top