Originally posted by: brigden
Clint knows.
Originally posted by: GTaudiophile
CMOS...especially in low light!
Canon > Nikon 😀
Originally posted by: Anubis
Originally posted by: GTaudiophile
CMOS...especially in low light!
Canon > Nikon 😀
not starting that again but on paper CCD > CMOS
theres a reason NASA uses CCDs to takes thoes awsome pics of hurricanes attacking florida
Originally posted by: Anubis
http://www.dalsa.com/markets/ccd_vs_cmos.asp
http://electronics.howstuffwor...om/digital-camera4.htm
http://www.kodak.com/US/en/cor...ogyFeatures/cmos.shtml
http://www.umax.co.uk/dl/CCDvsCMOS.pdf
http://www.axis.com/products/video/camera/ccd_cmos.htm
you know google has like 17,200 of these
Originally posted by: glen
Originally posted by: Anubis
Originally posted by: GTaudiophile
CMOS...especially in low light!
Canon > Nikon 😀
not starting that again but on paper CCD > CMOS
theres a reason NASA uses CCDs to takes thoes awsome pics of hurricanes attacking florida
Kick backs?