Cloud Atlas Trailer #?

rockyct

Diamond Member
Jun 23, 2001
6,656
32
91
RT average of 81% with 31 reviews. http://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/cloud_atlas_2012/

It looks like it will be respectable at the very least. I'm looking forward to it. I like to encourage movie studios when they make risky movies like these. I'm sure they only green lit it because of the names attached. Still though, it's based on a novel that would be generous to even say it has a cult following.
 

Aikouka

Lifer
Nov 27, 2001
30,383
912
126
So, did anyone else go and see this movie this weekend? I thought it was interesting, but the overarching message didn't seem very complex. Although, for me, the true testament to a long movie is if it doesn't feel that long.
 

ImpulsE69

Lifer
Jan 8, 2010
14,946
1,077
126
From the trailers one would think it spans too much of a time arc and story arch to try to compress it into a sensible 2-3 hour movie and have it make any sense w/o cutting much of the things that made the story good to begin with out.
 

Raizinman

Platinum Member
Sep 7, 2007
2,355
75
91
meettomy.site
Saw it last week at a screening. BORING BORING BORING !!!

Too long, didn't make sense. Things just didn't connect. Perhaps if I read the book, but I don't like to read the book to every movie I see. It was 2 hours and 51 minutes long. Way way too long. I'll admit the last 30 minutes was OK and actually had some movement (action), but the rest was a total loser. The comments from others in our group was the movie was 2 hours and 30 minutes too long and just a bunch of actors showing off trying to prove they can play various parts. Let them show off to someone else.
 

Ruptga

Lifer
Aug 3, 2006
10,246
207
106
I saw it the other day. I found the individual stories a lot more compelling than the overarching one, though that isn't exactly a complaint. It didn't feel long, but I did leave the theater wondering what exactly I was supposed to take away from it all. The obvious reincarnation thing is, uh, obvious. But I think the main thing to take away is just how little human nature changes over the centuries. The characters are in widely different circumstances, but they end up dealing with a lot of the same issues.

You do have to go into it knowing it is an artsy and sometimes needlessly complex movie, though.
 

TecHNooB

Diamond Member
Sep 10, 2005
7,458
1
76
i haven't seen it yet, but i have a feeling it will be both interesting and full of itself. i'm willing to look past the latter.
 

Northern Lawn

Platinum Member
May 15, 2008
2,231
2
0
This movie gonna bomb? I heard it only got 9M this weekend.

Wow, by the looks of the trailer it must have cost 2-3 hundred million to make. Another Water World perhaps.

It's getting good scores at IMBD 8.4 i think it was.
 
Last edited:

rockyct

Diamond Member
Jun 23, 2001
6,656
32
91
From the trailer I decided to listen to the audiobook before I see the movie. I'm about half way through it so far. It's a 21 hour audiobook so it is quite a long novel.
 

Northern Lawn

Platinum Member
May 15, 2008
2,231
2
0
From the trailer I decided to listen to the audiobook before I see the movie. I'm about half way through it so far. It's a 21 hour audiobook so it is quite a long novel.

Game of Thrones was is 28 hours.. I decided to read it instead.
 

zerocool84

Lifer
Nov 11, 2004
36,041
472
126
This movie gonna bomb? I heard it only got 9M this weekend.

It debuted at #3 with 9.4M, not good especially for such an expensive movie. I'm sure people preparing for the hurricane on the east coast didn't help either.
 

TecHNooB

Diamond Member
Sep 10, 2005
7,458
1
76
I think it's going to bomb. I don't know how good a movie it is, but reincarnation nonsense isn't going to be popular.

i haven't seen the movie yet, but i don't think it's about reincarnation in the religious sense.
 

Aikouka

Lifer
Nov 27, 2001
30,383
912
126
I saw it the other day. I found the individual stories a lot more compelling than the overarching one, though that isn't exactly a complaint. It didn't feel long, but I did leave the theater wondering what exactly I was supposed to take away from it all. The obvious reincarnation thing is, uh, obvious. But I think the main thing to take away is just how little human nature changes over the centuries. The characters are in widely different circumstances, but they end up dealing with a lot of the same issues.

You do have to go into it knowing it is an artsy and sometimes needlessly complex movie, though.

Oddly enough, I didn't really find it to be that complex. The only thing that I hold truetrue was the difficulty in understanding the dialog at times -- especially in the final time period. :p I thought the most interesting part was trying to determine which actor/actress was playing a role that appeared on screen. I actually missed every cross-dressing role except for Hugo Weaving's large-and-in-charge role; that one was rather obvious.

As a bit of a Sci-Fi fan, I would have liked to see more of the Neo Seoul timeline as the whole dystopian future is a bit intriguing.

This movie gonna bomb? I heard it only got 9M this weekend.

When I saw IMDB list the top performers on Friday at 9M and 3M and Cloud Atlas wasn't one of them, I knew that didn't sound good. However, IMDB states that the budget was only 100 million (estimated). That should be easy enough to recoup, but it surely won't look good.

EDIT:

i haven't seen the movie yet, but i don't think it's about reincarnation in the religious sense.

Well, (by the way, this really isn't much of a spoiler...)
in Neo Seoul when the archivist is having Sun Me recall her time with The Union, he asks her what she thinks Heaven is. She mentions that it is like a door opening.
Now, I saw the movie in religious Alabama with a bunch of old people in the theater, and none of them seemed perturbed. So, I wouldn't worry about it.
 
Last edited:

Ns1

No Lifer
Jun 17, 2001
55,420
1,600
126
jesus cloud atlas flopped so hard - it's like speed racer part deux. wachowski's never getting another gig again.
 

BladeVenom

Lifer
Jun 2, 2005
13,365
16
0
I actually missed every cross-dressing role except for Hugo Weaving's large-and-in-charge role; that one was rather obvious.

So there's lots of cross dressing? No wonder most people don't want to go see it.

Is that why Tom Hanks is in the movie, he misses the days of Bosom Buddies.
 
Last edited:

Aikouka

Lifer
Nov 27, 2001
30,383
912
126
So there's lots of cross dressing? No wonder most people don't want to go see it.

Is that why Tom Hanks is in the movie, he misses the days of Bosom Buddies.

Yes. I think every actor and actress except for Tom Hanks ( :p ) played a character of the opposite gender at some point... including Halle Berry. Although, some of the roles were very small, and may have had no speaking lines. The largest was definitely Hugo Weaving's role as the head nurse.

EDIT:

Do keep in mind that I couldn't even tell most of them. At the end of the movie, they show all of the characters that each person played, which revealed a lot of those cross-dressing roles.
 

Svnla

Lifer
Nov 10, 2003
17,986
1,388
126
I did watch the movie last week. It was not bad at all but not great by any means. The only "part" that I did like was the new Korea but not sure why the white actors had to do slant eyes.
 

The_Dude8

Diamond Member
Jan 8, 2000
5,167
1
71
I did watch the movie last week. It was not bad at all but not great by any means. The only "part" that I did like was the new Korea but not sure why the white actors had to do slant eyes.

and that one white guy looks exactly like Neo from the matrix; Too many stories and i don't know what was all the mini stories about.