H hergehen Senior member Sep 13, 2001 640 0 0 May 24, 2003 #1 looks like a hell of a car... just .1 of second behind WRX on 0-60 (though there it said 0-100km/hr (0-62mph), so might not be very accurate) specs pics
looks like a hell of a car... just .1 of second behind WRX on 0-60 (though there it said 0-100km/hr (0-62mph), so might not be very accurate) specs pics
K KingNothing Diamond Member Apr 6, 2002 7,141 1 0 May 24, 2003 #2 Front end vaguely reminds me of the new Cavaliers. Which is to say, ugly.
N ndee Lifer Jul 18, 2000 12,680 1 0 May 24, 2003 #3 That's not the Clio Sport, that's the Clio V6 and it also costs about 15'000$ more then the normal WRX.
That's not the Clio Sport, that's the Clio V6 and it also costs about 15'000$ more then the normal WRX.
Siddhartha Lifer Oct 17, 1999 12,505 3 81 May 24, 2003 #6 Originally posted by: hergehen looks like a hell of a car... just .1 of second behind WRX on 0-60 (though there it said 0-100km/hr (0-62mph), so might not be very accurate) specs pics Click to expand... Oh, oh be careful someone got flamed for starting a thread about a car that is not available in the US
Originally posted by: hergehen looks like a hell of a car... just .1 of second behind WRX on 0-60 (though there it said 0-100km/hr (0-62mph), so might not be very accurate) specs pics Click to expand... Oh, oh be careful someone got flamed for starting a thread about a car that is not available in the US
L LS20 Banned Jan 22, 2002 5,858 0 0 May 24, 2003 #7 i love the clio v6...sounds great ....(in gran turismo )
B boyRacer Lifer Oct 1, 2001 18,569 0 0 May 24, 2003 #8 Mid engine... mmmmmm... liked it ever since it came out.