Climate skeptics hold scientific review, unexpectedly find global warming is real

[Tom]

There are farms that recycle co2 from cows into something, I forget what though.

 

[DrPizza]

There are farms that recycle co2 from cows into something, I forget what though.

It's methane, and they use it to power generators at some farms.

 

[JohnOfSheffield]

(4) Short of killing them it is extremely unlikely you will convince the billions of people living in mud huts and shitting in holes they dug themselves to not increase their carbon footprint in order to better their lives. The world, at least in the here and now, simply can not afford or is unwilling to implement (as in lobbing a few hundred nukes) a true solution regardless of how bad the problem may be.

That would be a valid argument if there was no technology that would keep our standard of living at the same rate as today.

Heatpumps, solar, wind, nuclear has more than the needed capacity, you don't need to fuel your car with gasoline today, nor is there ANY reason to use coal or oil at any plant to make electricity.

It's not even more expensive but a LOT CHEAPER in the long run to phase out oil and coal, everyone knows that except the oil producing nations, one of them is the USA.

It really has to take a REAL daft fucker to not realise that releasing a sheitload of CO2 into the atmosphere will have consequences, and i mean someone who is fucked in the head beyond all help or simply someone who rather bets against all knowledge that any man who has ever tended a garden has.

 

[JohnOfSheffield]

It's methane, and they use it to power generators at some farms.

Exactly, bio gas.

 

[piasabird]

Land fills also make methane, but they burn it off. Caterpillar makes a power generator that can run off of methane.

http://www.cleanairsys.com/airzone-blog/2007/08/caterpillar-generators-selected-for.html

 

[shira]

I asked for one freaking paper to back up your claim of "catastrophic damage" caused by MMCC, just one so i could check it out. You gave me 350 studies like.

"Greenhouse crises of the past 300 million years" and what the hell does that have to do with CC caused by the industrial revolution ? or "Proxy-based reconstructions of hemispheric and global surface temperature variations over the past two millennia" and (i love this one) "A strong bout of natural cooling in 2008" You made the catastrophic damage claim, now show it with an adequate study. Thanks for some of those 350 studies that support my opinion btw.

Deny, deny, deny, deny, deny, deny, deny, deny, . . . .

Do you ever get tired of the self-deception?