Climate Change Is Harming U.S. Economy report says

Thebobo

Lifer
Jun 19, 2006
18,574
7,672
136
This is part two, the WSJ story is just a brief, the Washington post article is more in depth.

From the Wall Street Journal.

Climate change is having a negative impact on people's everyday lives and damaging the U.S. economy as extreme weather brings flooding, droughts and other disasters to every region in the nation, a federal advisory committee has concluded.

The congressionally mandated National Climate Assessment, produced by more than 300 experts overseen by a panel of 60 scientists, concludes that the nation has already suffered billions of dollars in damages from severe weather-related disruptions, which it says will continue to get worse.

The document, considered the most comprehensive analysis of the effects of climate change on the U.S., was released by the climate panel after a final vote by the authors Tuesday morning. President Barack Obama is planning to promote it in a series of events this week, calling for action to combat the trend and using the report to bring public attention to climate-change-related problems.

"This national climate assessment is the loudest and clearest alarm bell to date signaling the need to take urgent action," said John Holdren, assistant to the president for science and technology, during a news-media call on the report.

The report, by the Federal National Climate Assessment and Development Advisory Committee, details the effects of climate change on every state, from rapidly receding ice in Alaska to heat waves and coastal flooding in the Northeast. Rising seas in the South put major cities such as Miami at risk, it says.

The report pins much of the increase in climate change on human behavior. It says, however, that it isn't too late to implement policies to reduce greenhouse-gas emissions, and calls on governments at all levels to find ways to lower the carbon emissions, particularly from energy production.

"Over recent decades, climate science has advanced significantly. Increased scrutiny has led to increased certainty that we are now seeing impacts associated with human-induced climate change," the report said.


From the washington post - more in depth.
 

brycejones

Lifer
Oct 18, 2005
29,133
29,314
136
Wow, this was published in the WSJ?

Unfortunately it probably won't do much to convince our resident man made climate change deniers.
 

OutHouse

Lifer
Jun 5, 2000
36,410
616
126
so when are we going to put sanctions on China for fucking up the planet with their pollution?
 

Paul98

Diamond Member
Jan 31, 2010
3,732
199
106
Was "Climate Change" harming the U.S. Economy in 1996?
There has been no warming for over 17 years.

Maybe you should wait for the climate to change first.

You can thank that to the strongest el nino ever recorded happening in 1997-98. Of course the next few years are going to be cooler. That always happens after an el nino, and the large ones usually cause a large cooling trend. Even so the global is still warming and there is still a energy imbalance. And if you look at the temperature that doesn't just start at that point you will see the trend.

But I am sure I am just talking to a brick wall so why bother.
 

Genx87

Lifer
Apr 8, 2002
41,091
513
126
Are these the same people who proclaimed we were going to see more and more Katrina like storms? And instead we have had really calm hurricane seasons ever since?
 

MongGrel

Lifer
Dec 3, 2013
38,466
3,067
121
Are these the same people who proclaimed we were going to see more and more Katrina like storms? And instead we have had really calm hurricane seasons ever since?
And I hope it stays that way considering where I'm at.
 

Jaskalas

Lifer
Jun 23, 2004
35,143
9,283
136
This is a frequently cited myth. You're getting bad information from a climate change denier site. I would suggest looking up the research on this. Needless to say, this is false.

The RSS temperature record is not false.
 

mrjminer

Platinum Member
Dec 2, 2005
2,739
16
76
I saw an article earlier today that said something to the effect of climate change is obviously occurring at a rapid pace because the dry, arid regions haven't been getting a lot of rain lately, and the known wet regions get a lot of rain. Now, I'm a believer!!!
 

Mr. Pedantic

Diamond Member
Feb 14, 2010
5,027
0
76
Wow, this was published in the WSJ?

Unfortunately it probably won't do much to convince our resident man made climate change deniers.

The stupid thing is that it doesn't really matter who or what is causing it, climate change of any sort is disastrous to the global economy.
 

MongGrel

Lifer
Dec 3, 2013
38,466
3,067
121
I saw an article earlier today that said something to the effect of climate change is obviously occurring at a rapid pace because the dry, arid regions haven't been getting a lot of rain lately, and the known wet regions get a lot of rain. Now, I'm a believer!!!
Ignorance is bliss.
 

DrPizza

Administrator Elite Member Goat Whisperer
Mar 5, 2001
49,601
167
111
www.slatebrookfarm.com
Are these the same people who proclaimed we were going to see more and more Katrina like storms? And instead we have had really calm hurricane seasons ever since?
"really calm hurricane seasons ever since": 2011 and 2012 were tied for 3rd most active hurricane season ever recorded. Derp. Don't let facts get in your way though.
 
Last edited:

michal1980

Diamond Member
Mar 7, 2003
8,019
43
91
weather doesn't equal climate until it does.

So once again, hot weather = climate change. Cold weather does not.
 

DrPizza

Administrator Elite Member Goat Whisperer
Mar 5, 2001
49,601
167
111
www.slatebrookfarm.com
In terms of major hurricanes making landfall like they predicted? Yes it has derp.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/09/15/major-us-hurricane_n_3930408.html

Why are you continuing to lie? Please, show me where they predicted more would make landfall. Hurricane season is like playing Russian roulette - sometimes you get lucky, sometimes you don't. Regardless, ever hear of Sandy? That was a much larger storm than Katrina. Ever hear of Ike? That was the 4th costliest storm ever (and even if you adjust for inflation, it's still in the top 10). How about Irene? 8th most expensive.
 
Last edited:

Paratus

Lifer
Jun 4, 2004
17,440
15,360
146
5yqTCVC.jpg


It's a well done report I suggest reading it.

http://nca2014.globalchange.gov
 

glenn1

Lifer
Sep 6, 2000
25,383
1,013
126
The stupid thing is that it doesn't really matter who or what is causing it, climate change of any sort is disastrous to the global economy.

Or you could more accurately say most of the proposed "solutions" to climate change would be even more disastrous to the global economy. God help us all if your plan relies on us being saved by some imaginary deus ex machina future technology solution, banning SUVs, and sending money to 3rd world countries in the hopes they remain technologically backward.
 

Paratus

Lifer
Jun 4, 2004
17,440
15,360
146
Or you could more accurately say most of the proposed "solutions" to climate change would be even more disastrous to the global economy. God help us all if your plan relies on us being saved by some imaginary deus ex machina future technology solution, banning SUVs, and sending money to 3rd world countries in the hopes they remain technologically backward.

How about if we increase their standard of living to the point their birth rates fall below replacement just like ours?
 

Genx87

Lifer
Apr 8, 2002
41,091
513
126
Why are you continuing to lie? Please, show me where they predicted more would make landfall. Hurricane season is like playing Russian roulette - sometimes you get lucky, sometimes you don't. Regardless, ever hear of Sandy? That was a much larger storm than Katrina. Ever hear of Ike? That was the 4th costliest storm ever (and even if you adjust for inflation, it's still in the top 10). How about Irene? 8th most expensive.

Seriously, were you hiding in a cave during and after Katrina? Predictions of Katrina like storms wreaking havoc on our coasts were to be the new norm. They weren't. And as my article points out, we have instead had one of the calmest period of major hurricanes to hit our shores in 100 years.