• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

CL2.5 vs CL2

tnguyen88

Senior member
As far as PC2700 DDR is concerned, is there a noticeable or signifigant gain from buying CL2 memory over CL2.5? Also, what would be the chances that I'd be able to run some Crucial CL2.5 at 2 with no problems?
 
really, you won't notice any difference between 2 and 2.5, we're talking hella fast clock cycles here, there's a very minoooote difference between them in human speed terms. I doubt you're running anything hardcore enough to see the advantage 🙂
 
Thanks for the responses guys, I kinda figured that there wouldn't be any major difference... just wanted to make sure.
 
From Crucial's FAQ:

What is the performance difference between CL2 and CL2.5 DDR modules?

Description:

What is the performance difference between CL2 and CL2.5 DDR modules?

Solution:

CAS latency 2 parts process data a little quicker than CAS latency 2.5 parts in that you have to wait a half clock cycle less for the initial data. However, after the first piece of data is processed, the rest of the data is processed at equal speeds. Latency only affects the initial burst of data. Once data starts flowing, there is no effect.

Bear in mind, a clock cycle for a system properly using a PC2100 DDR module is 8 nanoseconds, so the difference between CAS latency 2 and CAS latency 2.5 for PC2100 parts is 4 billionths of a second. You probably won't be able to notice the difference.

All of Crucial's PC1600 DDR parts are CAS latency 2.
 
Back
Top