Civilian Inmate Labor Program - Army Regulation 210–35 - nothing to see here

[NoStateofMind]

Yeah I got this from a weird video that is questionable but the information seems legit.

go to www.army.mil and search for 210-35

You will see this PDF

Here is a portion. I haven't read the entire thing yet.

Edit - nothing really to see here. Looks like this is for "unused military installations" and not unconstitutional.

 

[Bowfinger]

How is it unconstitutional? Wikipedia

 

[pcgeek11]

Chapter 1
Introduction
1–1. Purpose
This regulation provides Army policy and guidance for establishing civilian inmate labor programs and civilian prison camps on Army installations. Sources of civilian inmate labor are limited to on– and off–post Federal corrections facilities, State and/or local corrections facilities operating from on–post prison camps pursuant to leases under Section 2667, Title 10, United States Code (10 USC 2667), and off–post State corrections facilities participating in the demonstration project authorized under Section 1065, Public Law (PL) 103–337. Otherwise, State and/or local inmate labor from off–post corrections facilities is currently excluded from this program.

I do not see illegal or unconstitutional.

 

[NoStateofMind]

How is it unconstitutional? Wikipedia

Chapter 1
Introduction
1–1. Purpose
This regulation provides Army policy and guidance for establishing civilian inmate labor programs and civilian prison camps on Army installations. Sources of civilian inmate labor are limited to on– and off–post Federal corrections facilities, State and/or local corrections facilities operating from on–post prison camps pursuant to leases under Section 2667, Title 10, United States Code (10 USC 2667), and off–post State corrections facilities participating in the demonstration project authorized under Section 1065, Public Law (PL) 103–337. Otherwise, State and/or local inmate labor from off–post corrections facilities is currently excluded from this program.

I do not see illegal or unconstitutional.

You are both right, thanks.